Advanced Search Results
Vishal Chandra Gupta vs Registrar of Companies Through Dy Registrar Nc ...
Delhi
Jan-20-2026
Land Acquisition
petition, the petitioner has assailed the ordersdated 13.08.2019 and 16.04.2022 passed by the learned ASJ-03 & Special Judge (Companies Act), Dwarka Courts, Delhi [hereafter „Special Court‟] in CC/439/2019 titled „ROC vs. Vishal Chandra Gupta‟.2. It is stated on … the petitioner herein was summoned for offence under Sections 447/448 Companies Act, 2013.3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner argues that thelearned Special Court … accused when the complainant is absent and when the conditions laid down in the said section are satisfied. Section 256 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code enables a Magistrate to acquit the accused if the complainant does not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Consultancy Services Limited Vs. Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd
Supreme Court of India
Mar-26-2021
MRTP
Companies Act, 1956 had not been repealed. The provisions for repeal are contained in Section 465 of The Companies Act, 2013. Section 465(1) repeals the 1956 Act, subject to certain stipulations mentioned in the provisos there under. Subsection (2) of … return, since the date of the incorporation of the private company, no body or bodies corporate has or 256 have held twentyfive per cent or more of its paid up share capital, (b) … (c) that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManish Kumar Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Jan-19-2021
Land Acquisition
2008, or an "officer who is in default", as defined in clause (60) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, or was in any manner incharge of, or responsible to the corporate debtor for the conduct of its
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Sri Vakati Narayana Reddy Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation
Karnataka
May-19-2022
Land Acquisition
for the respondent has also brought to the notice of this Court that under Section 4(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. It is referred in sub-clause (a) of Section 4(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, which refers as under:
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSupriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Oct-17-2023
Land Acquisition
individuals, firm, cooperative or other society, association, trust, agency, or 233 As defined in Section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013. 234 Section 2(b)(i), Transgender Persons Act 192 PART D institution.235 ‘Establishment’ therefore includes any public or private entity, … Union of India is unfounded when tested on constitutional principles. xi. The right of transgender persons to marry 256. Some petitioners have sought a declaration that the right to marry a person of their choice applies to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskManoj Metals and Another Vs. The Assistant Commissioner, Chennai.
Chennai
Mar-02-2016
Land Acquisition
Tax Officer (CT), Chintadripet Assessment Circle, Chennai reported in (2013) 59 VST 256 (Mad). c. Sri Vinayaga Agencies vs. Assistant Commissioner (CT) Vadapalani-I Assessment Circle, … sales to the petitioner and have also not produced the documents as per Section 19(13) of the TNVAT Act. Further, huge quantum of suppression of transactions were unearthed, claiming bill trading transactions. 2.3. The petitioner objected to … and the inspecting officials alleged that there would be reversal of ITC for the assessment years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 for the reason that the sellers have not reported their sales to the petitioner and have also not
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Property Company (P) Ltd. versus Rohinten Daddy Mazda
Supreme Court of India
Jan-07-2026
Land Acquisition
[2026] 1 S.C.R. 227
could be said to have the power to condone the delay in filing an appeal u/s.58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013; that even if s.5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, per say, could not be applied to quasi-judicial bodies, … quasi-judicial body, could be said to have the power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Act, 2013? .................................... 25 a. The Act, 1963, per say, does not apply to quasi-judicial
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.E Investments Limited Vs. Intercon Infotech Pvt Ltd
Delhi
Apr-21-2014
Education
respondent is unable to pay its debts and, therefore, should be wound up, under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed a loan agreement dated 11.05.2010 on record which indicates
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRoseland Buildtech Pvt Ltd vs Vihaan 43 Reality Pvt Ltd Earlier Known ...
Delhi
Jan-05-2026
Land Acquisition
Act, 1993, the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and the Companies Act, 2013. These statutes provide for creation of multiple fora such as Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), Debt … 16 SCC 331.(2023) 8 SCC 274.(2022) 2 SCC 583.(2018) 1 SCC 407.(2025) 256 Comp Cas 822.(2023) 8 SCC 387.(2020) 10 SCC 538. 2024 SCC OnLine … 13 V. OBJECT AND PURPOSE OF THE IBC............................................ 14 VI. OUSTER PROVISIONS UNDER THE IBC .................................... 19 VII. SECTIONS 65, 75, 60(5)(C) OF THE IBC AND THE RELEVANT NCLT RULES, 2016 ................................................................................... 20 A. SCOPE OF SECTION
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNew India Timber Store vs Hsk Infra Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
Delhi
May-11-2026
Land Acquisition
the suit was between the appellant and the respondent no. 1, which is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013. It was stated that the appellant had illegally impleaded respondents no. 2 & 3; they are neither necessary … application for review of the order dated 28.05.2025 filed by the respondents no. 2 & 3 herein under Section 47 read with Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) was allowed by the learned
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »