Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: companies act 2013 section 256 · Page 1 of about 449 results (0.087 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 20 2026

Vishal Chandra Gupta vs Registrar of Companies Through Dy Registrar Nc ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-20-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

petition, the petitioner has assailed the ordersdated 13.08.2019 and 16.04.2022 passed by the learned ASJ-03 & Special Judge (Companies Act), Dwarka Courts, Delhi [hereafter „Special Court‟] in CC/439/2019 titled „ROC vs. Vishal Chandra Gupta‟.2. It is stated on … the petitioner herein was summoned for offence under Sections 447/448 Companies Act, 2013.3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner argues that thelearned Special Court … accused when the complainant is absent and when the conditions laid down in the said section are satisfied. Section 256 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code enables a Magistrate to acquit the accused if the complainant does not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 2021

Tata Consultancy Services Limited Vs. Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-26-2021

Subject : MRTP

Companies Act, 1956 had not been repealed. The provisions for repeal are contained in Section 465 of The Companies Act, 2013. Section 465(1) repeals the 1956 Act, subject to certain stipulations mentioned in the provisos there under. Sub­section (2) of … return, since the date of the incorporation of the private company, no body or bodies corporate has or 256 have held twenty­five per cent or more of its paid­ up share capital, (b) … (c) that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

2008, or an "officer who is in default", as defined in clause (60) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, or was in any manner incharge of, or responsible to the corporate debtor for the conduct of its

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 19 2022

Sri Vakati Narayana Reddy Vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : May-19-2022

Subject : Land Acquisition

for the respondent has also brought to the notice of this Court that under Section 4(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. It is referred in sub-clause (a) of Section 4(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, which refers as under:

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 17 2023

Supriyo @ Supriya Chakraborty Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-17-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

individuals, firm, cooperative or other society, association, trust, agency, or 233 As defined in Section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013. 234 Section 2(b)(i), Transgender Persons Act 192 PART D institution.235 ‘Establishment’ therefore includes any public or private entity, … Union of India is unfounded when tested on constitutional principles. xi. The right of transgender persons to marry 256. Some petitioners have sought a declaration that the right to marry a person of their choice applies to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 02 2016

Manoj Metals and Another Vs. The Assistant Commissioner, Chennai.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-02-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tax Officer (CT), Chintadripet Assessment Circle, Chennai reported in (2013) 59 VST 256 (Mad). c. Sri Vinayaga Agencies vs. Assistant Commissioner (CT) Vadapalani-I Assessment Circle, … sales to the petitioner and have also not produced the documents as per Section 19(13) of the TNVAT Act. Further, huge quantum of suppression of transactions were unearthed, claiming bill trading transactions. 2.3. The petitioner objected to … and the inspecting officials alleged that there would be reversal of ITC for the assessment years 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 for the reason that the sellers have not reported their sales to the petitioner and have also not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2026

The Property Company (P) Ltd. versus Rohinten Daddy Mazda

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-07-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 227

could be said to have the power to condone the delay in filing an appeal u/s.58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013; that even if s.5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, per say, could not be applied to quasi-judicial bodies, … quasi-judicial body, could be said to have the power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Act, 2013? .................................... 25 a. The Act, 1963, per say, does not apply to quasi-judicial

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2014

S.E Investments Limited Vs. Intercon Infotech Pvt Ltd

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-21-2014

Subject : Education

respondent is unable to pay its debts and, therefore, should be wound up, under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. The learned counsel for the petitioner has placed a loan agreement dated 11.05.2010 on record which indicates

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 05 2026

Roseland Buildtech Pvt Ltd vs Vihaan 43 Reality Pvt Ltd Earlier Known ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-05-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 1993, the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 and the Companies Act, 2013. These statutes provide for creation of multiple fora such as Board of Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR), Debt … 16 SCC 331.(2023) 8 SCC 274.(2022) 2 SCC 583.(2018) 1 SCC 407.(2025) 256 Comp Cas 822.(2023) 8 SCC 387.(2020) 10 SCC 538. 2024 SCC OnLine … 13 V. OBJECT AND PURPOSE OF THE IBC............................................ 14 VI. OUSTER PROVISIONS UNDER THE IBC .................................... 19 VII. SECTIONS 65, 75, 60(5)(C) OF THE IBC AND THE RELEVANT NCLT RULES, 2016 ................................................................................... 20 A. SCOPE OF SECTION

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 11 2026

New India Timber Store vs Hsk Infra Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-11-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

the suit was between the appellant and the respondent no. 1, which is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013. It was stated that the appellant had illegally impleaded respondents no. 2 & 3; they are neither necessary … application for review of the order dated 28.05.2025 filed by the respondents no. 2 & 3 herein under Section 47 read with Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) was allowed by the learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial