Advanced Search Results
Devas Multimedia Private Limited Vs. Antrix Corporation Limited
Supreme Court of India
Jan-17-2022
Land Acquisition
the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Act 31 of 2016) received the assent of the President on 28.05.2016. Section 255 of this Code declared that the Companies Act, 2013 shall stand amended in the manner specified in the … was issued by the 86 Central Government in exercise of the power conferred by Section 143(11) of the Companies Act, 2013. Section 143(12) obliges the Auditor to report to the Central Government, if he has reason to believe that an
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAction Ispat & Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs.shyam Metalics & Energy Limi ...
Delhi
Oct-10-2019
Land Acquisition
must take note of the changes brought about by the recent amendments to Company Law and IBC (Code).24. Section 255 of IBC reads as under: “255. Amendments of Act 18 of 2013.- The Companies Act, 2013 shall be … order dated 14.01.2019 held that the power to transfer a petition to NCLT under Section 434(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 is „discretionary‟ and „has to be exercised in the facts and circumstances of the case so as to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMoser Baer Karamchari Union Thr. President Mahesh Chand Sharma Vs. Uni ...
Supreme Court of India
May-02-2023
Land Acquisition
Baer Karamchari Union have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction or order striking down Section 327(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2013”) as arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. … India, the respective writ petitioners have prayed that Clause 19(a) of the Eleventh Schedule of the IBC pursuant Section 255 of the IBC, be declared as unreasonable and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India as
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Jaipur Metals and Electricals Employees Organization Thru General Secr ...
Supreme Court of India
Dec-12-2018
Education
important questions of law which need to be decided at the earliest, we have disregarded this preliminary objection.9. Section 255 of the Insolvency Code reads as follows: “255. Amendments of Act 18 of 2013.-The Companies Act, 2013 shall … 4 have argued that a perusal of the Eleventh Schedule of the Code and amendments made to the Companies Act, 2013, particularly to Section 434 therein, would show that all winding up proceedings pending before the High Court are
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHasham Investment And Trading Company Private Limited Vs. India Awake ...
Karnataka
Jan-14-2022
Land Acquisition
issued to the petitioner-accused No.1 Company was revoked/ cancelled by virtue of powers under Section 8(6) of the Companies Act, 2013. The learned single Judge, by the Order dated 04.01.2022 dismissed the 18 said writ petitions, holding that, a … the said proceedings, and by the Order dated 31.12.2021, the learned Magistrate, exercising the powers conferred under Section 255(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, convicted accused Nos.1, 2 and 5 for the offence punishable under Section
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK.M. Chikkathayamma and Others Vs. The State of Karnataka, Urban Devel ...
Karnataka
Mar-10-2016
Land Acquisition
Acquisition Act, 1894 is the general law relating to acquisition of land for public purposes and also for companies and for determining the amount of compensation to be made on account of such acquisition. The provisions of … KUDA Act or the BDA Act, the following provisions are to be made applicable: LA Act, 1894 New Act, 2013 Section 8 Section 20 Section 9 Section 21 Section 11 Section 23 Section 12 Section 37 Section 15 Sections … have been inherited by Petitioner no.2. And the land in Survey no. 255/1 measuring 35 guntas of the same village, is said to belong to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMadhu Ashok Kapur and Others Vs. Rana Kapoor and Others
Mumbai
Mar-24-2014
Education
a conflict between the two provisions, the provisions of Section 10A will have an overriding effect. For example, Section 255 of the Companies Act provides for retirement of not less than two thirds of the total number of … to the Articles of Defendant No. 6 as also to the provisions for appointment of directors under the Companies Act, 1956 (œCompanies Act?). The Plaintiffs also incorporated appropriate prayers for the requisite declarations and injunctions in respect of … Articles. There were meetings and discussions between the two groups. In May 2013, the Plaintiffs received a notice of the 9th Annual General Meeting of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAction Ispat And Power Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Shyam Metalics And Energy Limited
Supreme Court of India
Dec-15-2020
Land Acquisition
transfer of winding up petitions from the Company Court to be tried by the NCLT under the Code.7. Section 255 of the Code reads as follows: “255. Amendments of Act 18 of 2013.-The Companies Act, 2013 shall be … counsel for SBI states that the creditors will reimburse the expenses of the OL.6. Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013 reads as follows: “[434. Transfer of certain pending proceedings-(1) On such date as may be notified by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Consultancy Services Limited Vs. Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd
Supreme Court of India
Mar-26-2021
MRTP
Companies Act, 1956 had not been repealed. The provisions for repeal are contained in Section 465 of The Companies Act, 2013. Section 465(1) repeals the 1956 Act, subject to certain stipulations mentioned in the provisos there under. Subsection (2) of … Where a public company referred to in sub section (2) becomes a private company on or after the 255 commencement of the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2000, such company shall inform the Registrar that it has become a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS. P. Gupta Vs. M/S. Packwell Manufacturers (Delhi) Pvt. Ltd.
Delhi
Aug-26-2013
Education
R. V. EASWAR, J.:1. This is an appeal filed by one S.P. Gupta under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). It is directed against the order passed by the Company Law … THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:19. h August, 2013 Date of decision:26. h August, 2013 + CO. A. (SB) No.35/2013 & … the Court can direct the introduction of a clause in the articles of association which runs contrary to Section 255 of the Act (Shanti Prasad Jain vs. Union of India) (supra). In Motion Pictures Association in re, 1984
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »