Advanced Search Results

Tata Consultancy Services Limited Vs. Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

Companies Act, 1956 had not been repealed. The provisions for repeal are contained in Section 465 of The Companies Act, 2013. Section 465(1) repeals the 1956 Act, subject to certain stipulations mentioned in the provisos there under. Sub­section (2) of

Abdul Jabbar, vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

loan. This, according to the de facto complainant, is in violation of Sections 185 and 186 of the Companies Act, 2013, inasmuch as no special resolution was passed by the Company for the above purpose and the landed assets … day of October, 2023ORDERApprehending arrest in crime No.271/2023 of Perinthalmanna police station, Malappuram district, for the offences under Section 420 read with 34 IPC, this application for bail is filed by accused Nos.1 to 3.2. The allegation

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

2008, or an "officer who is in default", as defined in clause (60) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, or was in any manner incharge of, or responsible to the corporate debtor for the conduct of its

Angelo Brother Ltd. (in Liqn.) Vs. Bennett Coleman and Co. Ltd.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Company

the Central Government in exercise of powers conferred under sub-sections (1) and (2) to Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Statutory Order was passed in exercise of power under Section 470(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. The

Moser Baer Karamchari Union Thr. President Mahesh Chand Sharma Vs. Uni ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

a period not exceeding 4 months within 12 months next before the relevant date, subject to limit in sub-section (2) of Section 530(1)(b). 3.5 It is submitted that prior to enactment of the Companies Act, 2013, there were … Baer Karamchari Union have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction or order striking down Section 327(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2013”) as arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.

The Property Company (P) Ltd. versus Rohinten Daddy Mazda

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2026] 1 S.C.R. 227

could be said to have the power to condone the delay in filing an appeal u/s.58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013; that even if s.5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, per say, could not be applied to quasi-judicial bodies, … quasi-judicial body, could be said to have the power to condone the delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Act, 2013? .................................... 25 a. The Act, 1963, per say, does not apply to quasi-judicial … [2026] 1 S.C.R. 227 : 2026 INSC 33 The Property Company (P) Ltd. v. Rohinten Daddy

Dinesh Gupta and Others vs.rajesh Gupta & Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

issued CS (OS) 51/2018 & Ors. Page 2 of 45 by the defendants under Section 100 of the Companies Act, 2013 in respect of the plaintiffs No.4,9,14 and 15 are null and void and unenforceable being in contravention of

Ajay Singh vs.kal Airways Private Limited and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

in view of the requirements of 42 (3) FAO(OS)(COMM) & connected cases Page 10 of 25 of the Companies Act, 2013, the company cannot make an invitation for fresh offer of securities unless and until the offer or invitation … S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellants, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, question the order of a learned single judge under Section 9, … of SpiceJet, the original first FAO(OS)(COMM) & connected cases Page 1 of 25 respondent (hereafter called “the company” or “SpiceJet”) owning 35,04,28, 758 equity shares,

Spicejet Limited vs.kal Airways Private Limited and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

in view of the requirements of 42 (3) FAO(OS)(COMM) & connected cases Page 10 of 25 of the Companies Act, 2013, the company cannot make an invitation for fresh offer of securities unless and until the offer or invitation … S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % 1. The appellants, under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, question the order of a learned single judge under Section 9, … of SpiceJet, the original first FAO(OS)(COMM) & connected cases Page 1 of 25 respondent (hereafter called “the company” or “SpiceJet”) owning 35,04,28, 758 equity shares,

Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd vs.shree Shyam Pulp & Board Mi ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

applicant has submitted that firstly the phrase used in the newly added proviso in section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013 states that “any party or parties to any proceedings may request for transfer of the proceedings” to the … for the applicant/UCO Bank states that they come to know about the pendency of the present petition on 23.05.2018 CO.PET. 81/2014 Page 1 of 7 during the pendency of the proceedings filed by the UCO Bank before