Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: companies act 2013 section 162 · Page 1 of about 705 results (0.141 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 09 2025

Serious Fraud Investigation Office versus Aditya Sarda

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-09-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025]5S.C.R.485

Thus, the impugned orders passed by the High Court granting anticipatory bail to the respondents set aside - Companies Act, 2013 - ss.212(6), 447. [Paras 9, 23, 24, 26-30] Companies Act, 2013 - ss. 212(6), 447 - Investigation into … under: (i) The Appellant i.e. Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) is a statutory body constituted and established under Section 211 of the Companies Act of 2013. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) vide the order dated 20.06.2018 … impugned herein. (ix) In case of the respondent Naveen Choudhary (Accused No. 162), the non-bailable warrants issued against him were not received back either executed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 08 2025

Serious Fraud Investigation Office versus Aditya Sarda

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-08-2025

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : [2025] 5 S.C.R. 485

Thus, the impugned orders passed by the High Court granting anticipatory bail to the respondents set aside - Companies Act, 2013 - ss.212(6), 447. [Paras 9, 23, 24, 26-30]Companies Act, 2013 - ss. 212(6), 447 - Investigation into affairs … - (i) The Appellant i.e. Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) is a statutory body constituted and established under Section 211 of the Companies Act of 2013. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) vide the order dated 20.06.2018 … impugned herein. (ix) In case of the respondent Naveen Choudhary (Accused No. 162), the non-bailable warrants issued against him were not received back either executed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 23 2019

Prem Kumar Aggarwal vs.serious Fraud Investigation Office

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-23-2019

Subject : Right to Information

offences alleged in the said complaint against the petitioner are under Section 128, 129, 447, 448 of the Companies Act, 2013, Section 209, 211 read with 628 of the Companies Act, 1956, and Section 467, 468, 471 read with Section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 07 2017

IAE International Aero Engines AG, Represented herein by its Attorney, ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-07-2017

Subject : Education

Dr. Vijay Mallya who is said to be residing presently in the United Kingdom. 9. Though the new Companies Act, 2013 has been enforced in India and some jurisdictions under that new Law have been transferred from this Court … ("KFA") filed a winding up petition against UBHL, being Company Petition No. 162 of 2013. The Consortium's claim arises out of a purported Corporate Guarantee … (Prayers: This Company Petition is filed under Section 439(1)(b) r/w Sections 433(e), 433(f), 434 and 450 of the Companies Act, 1956, praying to order that the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2013

Kusumam N. Kutty Vs. the Registrar of Companies Act Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-07-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

a company, of which the petitioner is its Managing Director, for an offence punishable under section 162 of Companies Act, mainly aggrieved by the order of the lower appellate court dismissing her appeal for default by order dated … THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.K.MOHANAN MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 17TH POUSHA 193 Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1424 of 2002 (Y) -------------------------------- CRA.539/2000 OF THE COURT OF ADDL.SESSIONS-V, ERNAKULAM, DATED 17

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 19 2021

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-19-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

2008, or an "officer who is in default", as defined in clause (60) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, or was in any manner incharge of, or responsible to the corporate debtor for the conduct of its … classes of financial creditors. This means, even in the case of any application filed by more than one 162 applicant, if the requirements of the Code are otherwise fulfilled, there can be cases where the applicants can

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 2024

Mr Girish S Palaskar vs the State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-02-2024

grounds is not maintainable. 2) The provisions of Sexual harassment of women at workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013 are in addition to the provisions contained in the Indian Penal Code, and therefore, lodging of the FIR … recorded under Section 161 of Cr.P.C., 1973 cannot be used as substantive evidence as is statutorily barred under Section 162 of the Code, 1973. It is settled law that statements recorded under Sec 162 of the Code, 1973

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 2024

M/s Rajesh Exports Ltd Vs. Mr Kv Kishore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-25-2024

Subject : Land Acquisition

in respect of the liability partnership or the officer in default, as defined under Section 2(60) of the Companies Act, 2013, or every person, who was, in any manner, in charge or responsible to the corporate debtor for the … A similar reasoning was adopted in B.V. John v. Coir Yam and Textiles Ltd., [1960]. 30 Comp Cas 162 (Ker), which related to proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act. Raman Nayar J., as he then was, held

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 2026

Mr. Aashay Harlalka vs State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-16-2026

pending consideration before the National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad in CP/48(AHM)2025 under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 initiated by the petitioner, -8- in which an interim order has been granted directing the parties to maintain … seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.502/2025 registered on 23.08.2025 before the respondent No.1-Police for the offences punishable under Sections 65, 66 of Information Technology Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as IT Act for short) and Sections -3- … in Bengaluru under the provisions of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, in Com.A.A.No. 162/2025, which is also pending consideration.22. There is already a complaint filed by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 2024

M/S Rajesh Exports Ltd vs Mr Kv Kishore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jun-25-2024

in respect of the liability partnership or the officer in default, as defined under Section 2(60) of the Companies Act, 2013, or every person, who was, in any manner, in charge or responsible to the corporate debtor for the … liquidation.A similar reasoning was adopted in B.V. John v. Coir Yam and Textiles Ltd., [1960] 30 Comp Cas 162 (Ker), which related to proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act. Raman Nayar J., as he then was, held

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial