Advanced Search Results

M/S Reebok India Company & Ors vs.registrar of Company

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Accounts and balance sheet of the company before the AGM and then to the ROC, as required under section 159 of the Companies Act. ROC also thereafter filed a complaint in this regard to CMM Tis Hazari Courts … MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH JAYANT NATH, J.(ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking to impugn the order dated 15.09.2014 passed by the Company Law Board dismissing the application of

M/S Columbia Sportswear India Sourcing Pvt Ltd vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

taken an identical view in Xilinx India’s case supra, as under:-2. The petitioner is a company incorporated underthe Companies Act, 2013. It has its registered office in Hyderabad, Telangana and branch office in New Delhi. The petitioner is a … FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 174 OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT 2017 ANNEXURE-A AS ULTRA VIRES THE CONSTITUTIONAL 101ST AMENDMENT ACT, … certiorari or any other writ ordirection or order to quash Circular. No. 159/15/2021 dated 20.09.2021 to extent of Para 3.6 as unconstitutional, enclosed as Annexure

M/S Amazon Development Centre India Private Limited vs Additional Comm ...

Court : Karnataka

taken an identical view in Xilinx India’s case supra, as under:-2. The petitioner is a company incorporated underthe Companies Act, 2013. It has its registered office in Hyderabad, Telangana and branch office in New Delhi. The petitioner is a … post-sale services provided by the Petitioner to its Foreign Affiliates is not in the nature of 'intermediary' under Section 2(13) of the IGST Act and that such service qualifies as 'export of service' under Section 2(6) of … aforesaid CBIC Circular No.159/15/2021-GST dated 20.09.2021, which is as under: Circular No. 159/15/2021-GST F.No. CBIC-20001/8/2021-GST Government of India Ministry of Finance Department of Revenue Central

Pushkar Mal Verma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the Registrar under Section 10 of the Companies Act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence.‖ 80. After noticing various provisions of the … was not found satisfactory. No.277 Phool Chand‘s note is endorsed by PW55 in Part 2/II page 81-82 of 2013 in vol IV , who adds to it that ― However the mistakes were rectified and the Annexure … 46. Jeet Ram Khokhar 204/2013 Same as A-32 4 47. Nirmal Devi 159/2013 Same as A-32 4 48. Amar Singh 255/2013 Same as A-32 4

Ajit Singh Sangwan Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the Registrar under Section 10 of the Companies Act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence.‖ 80. After noticing various provisions of the … was not found satisfactory. No.277 Phool Chand‘s note is endorsed by PW55 in Part 2/II page 81-82 of 2013 in vol IV , who adds to it that ― However the mistakes were rectified and the Annexure … 46. Jeet Ram Khokhar 204/2013 Same as A-32 4 47. Nirmal Devi 159/2013 Same as A-32 4 48. Amar Singh 255/2013 Same as A-32 4

Nirmal Devi Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the Registrar under Section 10 of the Companies Act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence.‖ 80. After noticing various provisions of the … was not found satisfactory. No.277 Phool Chand‘s note is endorsed by PW55 in Part 2/II page 81-82 of 2013 in vol IV , who adds to it that ― However the mistakes were rectified and the Annexure … 46. Jeet Ram Khokhar 204/2013 Same as A-32 4 47. Nirmal Devi 159/2013 Same as A-32 4 48. Amar Singh 255/2013 Same as A-32 4

Rekha Sharma Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the Registrar under Section 10 of the Companies Act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence.‖ 80. After noticing various provisions of the … was not found satisfactory. No.277 Phool Chand‘s note is endorsed by PW55 in Part 2/II page 81-82 of 2013 in vol IV , who adds to it that ― However the mistakes were rectified and the Annexure … 46. Jeet Ram Khokhar 204/2013 Same as A-32 4 47. Nirmal Devi 159/2013 Same as A-32 4 48. Amar Singh 255/2013 Same as A-32 4

Raksha Jindal Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the Registrar under Section 10 of the Companies Act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence.‖ 80. After noticing various provisions of the … was not found satisfactory. No.277 Phool Chand‘s note is endorsed by PW55 in Part 2/II page 81-82 of 2013 in vol IV , who adds to it that ― However the mistakes were rectified and the Annexure … 46. Jeet Ram Khokhar 204/2013 Same as A-32 4 47. Nirmal Devi 159/2013 Same as A-32 4 48. Amar Singh 255/2013 Same as A-32 4

Sheesh Pal Singh Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the Registrar under Section 10 of the Companies Act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence.‖ 80. After noticing various provisions of the … was not found satisfactory. No.277 Phool Chand‘s note is endorsed by PW55 in Part 2/II page 81-82 of 2013 in vol IV , who adds to it that ― However the mistakes were rectified and the Annexure … 46. Jeet Ram Khokhar 204/2013 Same as A-32 4 47. Nirmal Devi 159/2013 Same as A-32 4 48. Amar Singh 255/2013 Same as A-32 4

Bani Singh Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

of an extract of annual returns certified to be true by the Registrar under Section 10 of the Companies Act, 1956 is prime facie established by it being exhibited as evidence.‖ 80. After noticing various provisions of the … was not found satisfactory. No.277 Phool Chand‘s note is endorsed by PW55 in Part 2/II page 81-82 of 2013 in vol IV , who adds to it that ― However the mistakes were rectified and the Annexure … 46. Jeet Ram Khokhar 204/2013 Same as A-32 4 47. Nirmal Devi 159/2013 Same as A-32 4 48. Amar Singh 255/2013 Same as A-32 4