Advanced Search Results
Tata Consultancy Services Limited Vs. Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd
Supreme Court of India
Mar-26-2021
MRTP
inclusion of a representative of small shareholders in the Board of Directors, is of a recent origin under Section 151 of the Companies Act, 2013 2 (2001) 4 SCC420152 and it is applicable only to a listed company; … Companies Act, 1956 had not been repealed. The provisions for repeal are contained in Section 465 of The Companies Act, 2013. Section 465(1) repeals the 1956 Act, subject to certain stipulations mentioned in the provisos there under. Subsection (2) of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssociation For Democratics Reforms Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Feb-15-2024
Right to Information
the IT Act was amended in 1978 to exempt the income of political parties through voluntary 174 The Companies Act 2013; Section 2(40) 175 The Companies At 2013; Section 137 121 PART F contributions for tax purposes (ostensibly to curb … conveyance of electors153. The law penalizes practices which have the effect of dis-franchising the voter through illegitimate means. 151 RPA, Section 123(2). The provision includes the threatening with injury including social ostracism and ex- communication from any
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskGreater Noida Industrial Development Authority versus Prabhjit Singh S ...
Supreme Court of India
Feb-12-2024
[2024] 2 S.C.R. 258
IBC.41. The NCLT has been constituted by the Central Government inexercise of power under Section 408 of the Companies Act, 2013. Section 408 of the Companies Act is in following terms: “The Central Government shall, by notification, constitute with effect … of Code of Civil Procedure, 190835, preserve the inherent powers of the Tribunal in the following terms: 34 Section 151.- Saving of inherent powers of Court. - Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to limit or otherwise
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
The Army Welfare Housing Organization (Regd) vs Mrs. Vijayamma
Karnataka
Apr-09-2025
NO.401/2, SWASTIK, MANANDI ARCADE F4, FIRST FLOOR, S C ROAD, SHESHADRIPURAM, BANGALORE - 560 020 COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT 2013 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. K SUBRAMANYA RAJU.15. M/S PRASIDDHI PROPERTIES PRIVATELIMITED HAVING ITS OFFICE AT NO.401/2, SWASTIK, … SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED: 17.01.2025 (ANEXURE-A) PASSED ON I.A.NO.2 FILED UNDER ORDE XLI RULE 5 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PRODUCED IN R.A.NO. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DEVANAHALLI BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT AND ETC.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Lakshmi Gold Khazaanaa Pvt Ltd., vs M/S Power Smart Media (Opc) Pv ...
Karnataka
Mar-09-2026
NO. 6052 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: M/S LAKSHMI GOLD KHAZAANAA PVT. LTD., SITUATED AT NO.475 (COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT 2013) 6TH CROSS, SAMPIGE MAIN ROAD COMPANIES ACT 2013) MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560003. REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE …PETITIONER (BY SRI. … and equity.4. After service of suit summons, the defendantappeared and filed written statement. The Plaintiff filed I.A.No.9 under Section 151 of CPC for seeking reopening of PW.1 for further chief examination; I.A.No.10 underOrder XVIII and Section 151 of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBindu Balakrishna Patali vs Smartowner Services India Private Limited
Karnataka
Aug-19-2025
ITS DIRECTOR VINAY E: [email protected] [email protected]. -2-2. PINEHILL PROPERTIES PRIVATE LIMITEDA COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT LEVEL 3 AND 4, EMBASSY DIAMANTE NO. 34, VITTAL MALLYA ROAD BENGALURU - … APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER SEEKING REFUND OF THE COURT FEE DEPOSITED AT THE TIME OF FILING, UNDER SECTION 151 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908 (ANNEXUREF). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMsk Worldwide Express Private Limited vs Msk Courier & Cargo Priva ...
Karnataka
Nov-13-2025
IA NO.3 FILED U/O.39 RULE 1&2 R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC. IN MFA NO.4173/2019 CIN:U63023KA2014PTC073755 PROVISIONS OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, NO.72, (OLD NO.797), “ANNAPOORNA” REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR, MR. M. SATISH KUMAR S/O LATE MR. MARIYAPPA AGED
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.K. Tandon & Anr. vs Securities and Exchange Board of India & ...
Delhi
Jan-23-2026
Land Acquisition
way of the present consolidated Judgment. PROLOGUE:2. The present Appeals have been filed under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 19561, assailing Judgement dated 01.09.20252 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in CO. APP. Nos. … Special Committee was envisaged to complete its task within one year, it had continued to seek extensions from 2013 to 2022 without fully discharging its mandate. r) The Special Committee filed Company Application No. from 28.05.2023, was … 49.(ii) Register of Members under Section 150.(iii) Index of Members under Section 151.(iv) Annual Returns under Section 159.(v) Books of Accounts under Section 209.(vi) Register
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC R Bhansali & Ors. vs Securities and Exchange Board of India & ...
Delhi
Jan-23-2026
Land Acquisition
way of the present consolidated Judgment. PROLOGUE:2. The present Appeals have been filed under Section 483 of the Companies Act, 19561, assailing Judgement dated 01.09.20252 passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in CO. APP. Nos. … Special Committee was envisaged to complete its task within one year, it had continued to seek extensions from 2013 to 2022 without fully discharging its mandate. r) The Special Committee filed Company Application No. from 28.05.2023, was … 49.(ii) Register of Members under Section 150.(iii) Index of Members under Section 151.(iv) Annual Returns under Section 159.(v) Books of Accounts under Section 209.(vi) Register
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNanosecond Technologies Private Limited vs Open Financial Technologies ...
Karnataka
Apr-07-2025
MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3121/2023 BETWEEN: NANOSECOND TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.453/1/4, TARASUBBA RAO ROAD H NAGAR, BANGALORE-560050 REP. HEREIN BY ITS DIRECTOR MR. … SRI.THARUN KUMAR, ADV. FOR SRI CHINMAY J MIRJI, ADV.) THIS APPEAL IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(R) R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 23.11.2022 PASSED ON I.A.NO.1 IN OS.NO.2065/2022 ON THE FILE OF THE XVIII
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »