Advanced Search Results
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Tufel Habib Bagvan and Ot ...
Mumbai Aurangabad
Jun-07-2016
Land Acquisition
the grounds mentioned in Section 149(2) of the MV Act. One of the points urged by the Insurance Companies as reproduced in para 3 of the judgment, is as under: "There is a significant difference between an … and (iii) Josphine James Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and another, 2013 AIR SCW 6633, submits that the insurer cannot contest a motor accident … that the insurer cannot contest a motor accident claim on merits, in addition to the grounds mentioned in Section 149(2) of the MV Act for avoiding its liability under the policy of insurance. He submits that the owner
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskTata Consultancy Services Limited Vs. Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd
Supreme Court of India
Mar-26-2021
MRTP
Companies Act, 1956 had not been repealed. The provisions for repeal are contained in Section 465 of The Companies Act, 2013. Section 465(1) repeals the 1956 Act, subject to certain stipulations mentioned in the provisos there under. Subsection (2) of … make an order enforcing a contract which is dependent on personal qualifications such as those mentioned in 191 Section 149(6) of the Companies Act, 2013. Moreover, it has been held in the case of Vaish Degree College (supra)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...
Delhi
Mar-30-2026
Right to Information
inspect the books of accounts during the search.59. He has drawn our attention to Section 128 of the Companies Act,2013 to contend that a company is allowed to keep books of accounts or other relevant papers in electronic … The preliminary objection raised is that the impugned notices aretime-barred as the time-limit of three years prescribed under Section 149(1)(a) of the Act, as amended by the Finance Act, 2021, to reopen the assessment for AYs 2013-14 and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
M/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...
Delhi
Mar-30-2026
Right to Information
inspect the books of accounts during the search.59. He has drawn our attention to Section 128 of the Companies Act,2013 to contend that a company is allowed to keep books of accounts or other relevant papers in electronic … The preliminary objection raised is that the impugned notices aretime-barred as the time-limit of three years prescribed under Section 149(1)(a) of the Act, as amended by the Finance Act, 2021, to reopen the assessment for AYs 2013-14 and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...
Delhi
Mar-30-2026
Right to Information
inspect the books of accounts during the search.59. He has drawn our attention to Section 128 of the Companies Act,2013 to contend that a company is allowed to keep books of accounts or other relevant papers in electronic … The preliminary objection raised is that the impugned notices aretime-barred as the time-limit of three years prescribed under Section 149(1)(a) of the Act, as amended by the Finance Act, 2021, to reopen the assessment for AYs 2013-14 and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM/S Huawei Telecommunications (India) Company Pvt. Ltd. vs Assistant C ...
Delhi
Mar-30-2026
Right to Information
inspect the books of accounts during the search.59. He has drawn our attention to Section 128 of the Companies Act,2013 to contend that a company is allowed to keep books of accounts or other relevant papers in electronic … The preliminary objection raised is that the impugned notices aretime-barred as the time-limit of three years prescribed under Section 149(1)(a) of the Act, as amended by the Finance Act, 2021, to reopen the assessment for AYs 2013-14 and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDurugamma Vs. S.G. Naresh and Others
Karnataka
Nov-07-2016
Motor Vehicles
offending vehicle-respondent No.2 herein. The learned Counsel submits that no statutory defence is available to the insurer under Section 149 (2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ( the Act for short) in much as deviation of route
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEnergy Watchdog vs.union of India & Ors
Delhi
Nov-06-2017
Right to Information
has been drawn by ld. Senior Counsels for both sides to the provisions of Section 149 of the Companies Act, 2013 which is concerned with the constitution of the Board of Directors of a company, the relevant extract whereof
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAssociation For Democratics Reforms Vs. Union Of India
Supreme Court of India
Feb-15-2024
Right to Information
the IT Act was amended in 1978 to exempt the income of political parties through voluntary 174 The Companies Act 2013; Section 2(40) 175 The Companies At 2013; Section 137 121 PART F contributions for tax purposes (ostensibly to curb … from direct or indirect influence by both State and non- 148 Justice Chandrachud (Paragraph 168), Justice Kaul (Paragraph19) 149 Justice Chandrachud, Justice Chellameshwar, Justice Bobde (paragraph 25 and29) 150 Justice Chandrachud (paragraph 170): “[…]. Individually, these information
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSarubai and Others Vs. Surendrasing and Another
Mumbai Aurangabad
Jul-07-2014
Land Acquisition
6. On the other hand, the learned counsel for the Insurance Company placed reliance on the following cases 2013 (3) T.A.C. 29 (S.C.) [United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Sujata Arora] and the decision of this Court … landmark case of Swarn Singh cited supra, the Apex Court has discussed and interpreted the relevant provision viz. section 149 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1948 ('the Act' for short). The Apex Court has discussed the difference between the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »