Advanced Search Results

Sulochana Gupta, vs Rbg Enterprises Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Kerala

of the Articles of Association. W.A.1083/2020 53. Appellants have further stated that as per Section 96(1) of the Companies Act, 2013, the company should hold its Annual General Meeting(AGM) every year and not more than 15 months shall elapse

Union Of India Vs. Deloitte Haskins And Sells Llp

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of Criminal Appeals/Civil Appeals raise common question(s) of law pertaining to the interpretation of Section 140(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act, 2013’) and the Investigation Report dated 28.05.2019 (hereinafter referred to as the … 103 detailed procedure is provided under the Rules issued in this regard. 3.8 It is further submitted that Section 144 of the Act provides that the auditor cannot provide certain services and the relevant one for the present

Pingaara Horticulture Farmers Producer Company Limited vs the Assessme ...

Court : Karnataka

NO.11511 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN: PINGAARA HORTICULTURE FARMERS PRODUCER COMPANY LIMITED, COMPANY LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 KALAKATTA, PUTTUR ROAD, VITAL-574243, KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, SRI. RAMAKISHORE K., AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SON OF … ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 07.03.2024 PASSED UNDER SECTION 144 R/W S.144B OF THE ACT FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2022-23 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 BEARING DIN NO.ITBA/AST/S/144/2023-24/1062208462(1) HEREIN

Aruna Oswal Vs. Pankaj Oswal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Tribunal (for short ‘the NCLT’) concerning maintainability of the applications filed under sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2 2. The case is the outcome of a family tussle. Late … passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (for short ‘the NCLT’) concerning maintainability of the applications filed under sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’). 2 2. The case … 1956. (See Dwarka Prasad Agarwal v. Ramesh Chander Agarwal, (2003) 6 SCC220 144. A dispute as regards right of inheritance between the parties is eminently

Semac Consultants Limited vs Assessment Unit

Court : Karnataka

(FORMERLY KNOWN AS REVATHI EQUIPMENT LIMITED) (SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST FOR M/S. SEMAC CONSULTANTS PRIVATE LIMITED) REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, SON OF SRI.DEEPAK JAIN HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT, … A) DIRECT IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 26.03.2024 PASSED UNDER SECTION 144 R.W.S 144B OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2022-23 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1. BEARING

M/S Inpv Lighting (India) Pvt Ltd vs Union of India

Court : Karnataka

NO. 36538 OF 2025 (T-IT) BETWEEN:1. M/S INPV LIGHTING (INDIA) PVT. LTDA PRIVATE LIMITED COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT 2013 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 713, 6TH B CROSS ROAD KORAMANGALA 3RD BLOCK BENGALURU - 560 034 … TO QUASH THEORDER DATED 28.03.2022 BEARING DIN NO.ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1041849074(1) PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO. 3 UNDER SECTION 147 R/W SECTION 144 AND SECTION 144B OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (ANNEXURE-A) AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

Chottanikkara Saheerali, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

24426/2018, 40504/2018, 9651/2019, In all these writ petitions, the challenge is against Sections 164(2)(a) and 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the disqualification thrust upon the petitioners for acting as Directors of Companies, pursuant to Sections 164 and … of June, 2021 [W.P.(C) Nos.21628/2020, 21393/2018, 24426/2018, 40504/2018, 9651/2019, In all these writ petitions, the challenge is against Sections 164(2)(a) and 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the disqualification thrust upon the petitioners for acting as

Shri Ranjit Karthikeyan vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

24426/2018, 40504/2018, 9651/2019, In all these writ petitions, the challenge is against Sections 164(2)(a) and 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the disqualification thrust upon the petitioners for acting as Directors of Companies, pursuant to Sections 164 and … of June, 2021 [W.P.(C) Nos.21628/2020, 21393/2018, 24426/2018, 40504/2018, 9651/2019, In all these writ petitions, the challenge is against Sections 164(2)(a) and 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the disqualification thrust upon the petitioners for acting as

Srikandan Suryanarayan, vs Union of India,

Court : Kerala

24426/2018, 40504/2018, 9651/2019, In all these writ petitions, the challenge is against Sections 164(2)(a) and 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the disqualification thrust upon the petitioners for acting as Directors of Companies, pursuant to Sections 164 and … of June, 2021 [W.P.(C) Nos.21628/2020, 21393/2018, 24426/2018, 40504/2018, 9651/2019, In all these writ petitions, the challenge is against Sections 164(2)(a) and 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the disqualification thrust upon the petitioners for acting as

Kotamballi Narasimhiah Suryanarayanan vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

24426/2018, 40504/2018, 9651/2019, In all these writ petitions, the challenge is against Sections 164(2)(a) and 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the disqualification thrust upon the petitioners for acting as Directors of Companies, pursuant to Sections 164 and … of June, 2021 [W.P.(C) Nos.21628/2020, 21393/2018, 24426/2018, 40504/2018, 9651/2019, In all these writ petitions, the challenge is against Sections 164(2)(a) and 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 and the disqualification thrust upon the petitioners for acting as