Advanced Search Results

Insolvency And Bankruptcy Board Of India Vs. Satyanarayan Bankatlal Ma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : MRTP

the offences under the Code shall be tried by the Special Court established under Chapter XXVIII of the Companies Act, 2013. He submits that the legislative intent is clear. There is no general reference to the provisions of the … Special Court consisting of Sessions Judge or Additional Sessions Judge is totally in ignorance of the provisions of sub-section (1) of Section 236 of the Code.5. Learned ASG submitted that sub-section (1) of Section 236 of the Code

Manish Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, a limited liability partnership, as defined in clause (n) of sub-section (1) of section 2 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act, 2008, or any other person incorporated with limited liability … 2008, or an "officer who is in default", as defined in clause (60) of section 2 of the Companies Act, 2013, or was in any manner incharge of, or responsible to the corporate debtor for the conduct of its

Rajeev Agarwal vs.union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

etc.7. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is established that respondent no.6 has repeatedly violated the Companies Act 2013, rules made thereunder and rules & regulations of PLL and Board approved policy for doing corruption. The corruption … Limited, thus, falls within the definition of „State‘ under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. As per section 17.3.2 of HR policies of Petronet LNG Limited, the person equal to the post of Vice President and … 07.2019 Pronounced on:20. 08.2019 + W.P.(C) 89/2019 & CM APPLs. 486/2019 & 14962/2019 RAJEEV AGARWAL Through: Mr. Raj Kishor ........ Petitioner Choudhary, Mr.Shakeel Ahmed, Mr.

Sukumari Muralidharan vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

appearedon behalf of the respondents and submitted that the disqualification of the petitioner under Section 164 of the Companies Act, 2013 occurred by operation of law. Therefore, whatever may be the reasons for non-filing of Annual Returns/ Financial Statements, … OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.NAGARESH FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2022 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 9596 OF 2022 PETITIONER: SUKUMARI MURALIDHARAN AGED 65 YEARS W/O. T.P.MURALEEDHARAN, RESIDING AT 31/224A,PUSHPANJALI, L.M.PYLEE ROAD,

Industrial Dev.bank Of India Through Stressed Assets Stabilisation Fun ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

(in liqn.) and Others. 3 For short, ‘the Company’. 4 For short, ‘Companies Act’. Civil Appeal No.2568 of 2013 Page 1 of 38 the customs authorities have the first right to sell the imported goods under the … the case of M/s. Sri Vishnupriya Industries Limited3, and the provisions of Section 529A and 530 of the Companies Act, 19564, 1 For short, ‘IDBI’. 2 The Superintendent of Central Excise and Customs v. M/s. Sri Vishnupriya Industries

Jan Utkarsh Nidhi Limited vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to declare the petitioner as 'Nidhi' under section 406 of the Companies Act, 2013 r/w Rule 3A of Nidhi Rules,W.P.(C) 15581/2022 1/92014; and/or IV. Issue any appropriate writ/order/direction in the nature of

Moser Baer Karamchari Union Thr. President Mahesh Chand Sharma Vs. Uni ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Baer Karamchari Union have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction or order striking down Section 327(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2013”) as arbitrary and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. … party. It is submitted that in 1985, the Companies (Amendment) Bill, 1985 sought to introduce the proviso to sub-section (1) of Section 529, definition of “workmen”, “workmen’s dues” and “workmen’s portion” through insertion of Section 529(3) and the

Prof.M. K. Sanoo vs State of Kerala,

Court : Kerala

in the writ petition: “(i) Declare that respondents 4 to 7 are disqualified under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 to act as the Directors/office bearers of respondent No.3 Yogam;(ii) Pass an order restraining respondent Nos.4 to 7 … KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 20TH POUSHA, 1943 WA NO. 602 OF 2021 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)

Prof. M.K.Sanoo vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

in the writ petition: “(i) Declare that respondents 4 to 7 are disqualified under Section 164(2) of the Companies Act, 2013 to act as the Directors/office bearers of respondent No.3 Yogam;(ii) Pass an order restraining respondent Nos.4 to 7 … KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.S.MANIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAJI P.CHALY MONDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 / 20TH POUSHA, 1943 WA NO. 602 OF 2021 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)

Jaipur Metals and Electricals Employees Organization Thru General Secr ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

4 have argued that a perusal of the Eleventh Schedule of the Code and amendments made to the Companies Act, 2013, particularly to Section 434 therein, would show that all winding up proceedings pending before the High Court are … of Company Law Administration (herein in this section referred to as the Company Law Board) constituted under sub- section (1) of Section 10-E of the Companies Act, 1956, immediately before such date shall stand transferred to the Tribunal