Advanced Search Results

State Load Dispatch Center, vs Nsl Sugars Limited

Court : Karnataka

BY ITS ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY6. PTC INDIA LIMITED(CIN NO.L40105DL1999PLC099328) A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY INCORPORATED AND REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1956 2nd FLOOR, NBCC TOWER 15 BHIKAJICAMA PLACE, NEW DELHI-110 066 E MAIL [email protected] (REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR)7. … DELHI 110 0014 Secy [email protected] (REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY POWER)3. CENTRAL ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION A STATUTORY BODY FUNCTIONING UNDER SECTION 76 OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT 2003 3rd & 4th FLOOR, CHANDERLOK BUILDING, 36, JANPATH, NEW DELHI-110 001 EMAIL. [email protected]

Madanlal Fakirchand Dudhediya Vs. Changdeo Sugar Mills Ltd. and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 9, 76, 76(1), 78(2), 87, 105 and 309(6); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Capital Issues (Continuation of Control) Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 105 and 105(1); Company Law

Reported in : AIR1958Bom491; (1958)60BOMLR254; ILR1958Bom250

the Original Side of the High Court of Bombay. The appeal raises a question of construction under the Companies Act, 1956, and the question arises in this way.2. The first defendant company Shree Changdeo Sugar Mills Limited is a … costs as against respondent No. 1. Wemake no order as to cross-objections.20. Appeal dismissed. Companies Act (I of 1956), Section 76(1) - Whether payment of commission on stores end debentures from profits of company outside profits of Section

State of Kerala Vs. West Coast Planters' Agencies Ltd., CochIn and Anr ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : CompanyCriminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 31, 76, 76(1), 76(2) and 133(3); Companies (Amendment) Act, 1956 - Sections 147, 150, 162 and 166; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898

Reported in : AIR1958Ker41; 1958CriLJ177

Regulations in Table A of the first schedule to the Act (now embodied in Section 174 of the Companies Act, 1956) which read together imply that a meeting can be held with less than two members.For Regulation 51 lays … same accused persons in two different cases raise the question whether there can be a general meeting under Section 76(1) of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, of a Company consisting only of one member. The 1st accused in

State of Andhra Pradesh and anr. Vs. Andhra Provincial Potteries Ltd. ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Companies Act, 1950 - Sections 220, 220(1) and 220(3); Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 31(5), 32, 131, 133, 133(3), 134, 134(2), 134(4), 134(12), 210, 220(1) and 220(2); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 76(2), 133(3), 162, 220 and 220(1)

Reported in : AIR1973SC2429; [1973]43CompCas514(SC); 1973CriLJ1616; (1973)2SCC786; [1974]1SCR410

the balance sheet and profit and loss account of the company as required under Section 220(1) of the Companies Act, 1956, which is punishable under Sub-section (3) of that section. Admittedly no general body meeting had been held and, … an offence is not disclosed under Section 134(4). A different offence might have been committed either under Section 76(2) or under Section 133(3).9. It is interesting to note that it was argued in Park v. Lawton [1911]

Madanlal Fakirchand Dudhediya Vs. Shree Changdeo Sugar Mills Ltd.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Company

Acts : Indian Company Law; Palmer's Company Law; Statute Law; Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 9, 76, 76(1), 76(2), 79 and 645; Companies (Amendment) Act, 1960; Indian Companies Act, 1862; Indian Companies Act, 1867; Indian Companies Act, 1900 - Sections 8, 8(1), 8(2) and 8(3); Indian Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 105, 105(1) and 111

Reported in : AIR1962SC1543; (1963)65BOMLR162; [1962]32CompCas604(SC); [1962(5)FLR35]; [1962]Supp3SCR973

principal question which arises in this appeal relates to the construction of s. 76(1) and (2) of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956) (hereinafter called the Act) before the amendment of sub-s. (2) in 1960. That question arises … 1 resisted this suit. It was urged on its behalf that as a result of the provisions of section 76(1) and (2) of the Act, the agreement in question had become void and could not be enforced. Respondents

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Balasundaram and Co.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 37; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 76 and 79

Reported in : [1980]124ITR240(Mad)

Direct Taxation - brokerage - Section 37 of Income Tax Act, 1961 and Sections 76 and 79 of Companies Act, 1956 - whether sum paid by assessee as brokerage for arranging for sale of preference shares to be allowed

Rameshbhai Ramanlal Patel Vs. Shree Bansidhar Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235, 237, 397, 398, 433, 443(2) and 439; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 162

Reported in : [2005]127CompCas806(Guj); (2005)6CompLJ277(Guj); [2005]58SCL396(Guj)

K.A. Puj, J.1. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956 on the ground that it is just and equitable that the respondent Company be wound up.2. It is … the decision of the Madras High Court in the case of S. SUNDARESAN V/S. PLAST-O-FIBRE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. 76 COMPANY CASES 38 (MADRAS) which elaborates several grounds for winding up of the Company under Section 433(f) of

Commissioner of Income Tax, Kanpur Vs. U.P. State Industrial Developme ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 76; Income Tax Act, 1961

Reported in : AIR1997SC2214; JT1997(4)SC546; 1997(3)SCALE496; (1997)4SCC701; [1997]3SCR846

placing of shares before the public. The Payment of underwriting commission is permissible under Section 76 of the Companies Act, 1956.7. The question that falls for consideration is whether the underwriting commission in respect of shares which could

In Re: Rohit Soaps and Detergents Private Limited;

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235 to 251, 391 to 394, 394A, 394(2), 394(3), 397 and 398; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rule 76

Reported in : [2005]61SCL161(All)

S.P. Mahrotra, J.1. The present Company Petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed by Rohit Soaps & Detergents Private Limited, having its Registered Office at 117/H-2/202, Pandu Nagar, … S.P. Mahrotra, J.1. The present Company Petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 has been filed by Rohit Soaps & Detergents Private Limited, … said order dated 30.1.2004, filed an Affidavit-Of-Service, sworn on 3.3.2004, under Rule 76 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959, interalia, mentioning compliance of the directions

Budhmal Bhansali @ B. Bhansali Vs. State of West Bengal and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : BankingCriminal

Acts : Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Sections 138, 139 and 141; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Section 303 and 303(2); ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 4, 74, 76 and 79; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 155(2), 156(1), 401 and 482

Reported in : III(2008)BC460,2008(2)CHN1002

Form No. 32, which is required to be submitted in terms of provision under Section 303(2) of the Companies Act, 1956.8. Learned Advocate for the petitioner with his usual fairness submitted before this Court that so far as the … Combined reading of Sub-section (2) of Section 303 read with Section 74 of the Indian Evidence Act and Section 76 of the Indian Evidence Act will indicate the nature of the public document.28. Section 76 of the Indian