Advanced Search Results

National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Additional Commissioner (Financ ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Municipal Tax

Acts : Companies Act 1956; Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act, 1955 - Sections 420, 420(3), 421, 421(1), 421(4), 622 and 622(1); Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Rules, 1955

Reported in : 2007(1)ALD312

dated 20-8-2001 was questioned. It is stated that the petitioner-National Insurance Company Limited has been established under the Companies Act 1956 and is a statutory body established by the Union of India and it is a sister organisation of … of demand draft towards payment of arrears and current year advertisement fee. The above demand was made under Section 421 read with Section 622 of the Hyderabad Municipal Corporations Act 1955, hereinafter in short referred to as 'Act'

In Re: Sankar Gope

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 41(1), 155(2), 156(1), 157, 161 and 482; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 120B, 406, 420, 421, 424, 467, 468 and 471; ;Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 235, 237, 239, 240, 241 and 242; ;Constitution of India - Article 226; ;R.B.I. Act

Reported in : (1994)2CALLT254(HC),1995CriLJ1358

of fund, etc., as alleged in the FIR, provide for particular remedy under the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, more particularly, the provisions of Sections 235, 237, 239, 240, 241 and 242 thereof. It was incompetent for … ORDERA.K. Dutta, J.1. By this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as Code), the petitioner-accused Sankar Gope (hereinafter referred

Capt. Kanwar Satpal Singh Vs. Rockland Leasing Ltd. and Others

Court : Union Territory Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission UT Chandigarh

Subject : MRTP

view of the above...” 6. It is specifically laid down in Sub-section (1) of Section 446 of the Companies Act, 1956 that if any proceedings are pending on such date these can continue till the date when winding up … High Court has in the case of Dr. C.V. Ratnam v. Union of India and Others, 2002 CTJ 421 (Andhra Pradesh High Court) (CP), held in para 45 as under: “45. Section 27 should not be read

Uni-ads Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner Mch, Hyd. and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractProperty

Acts : Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act, 1955 - Sections 420 and 421; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 21, 226 and 298; Companies Act, 1956; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 115

Reported in : 1999(2)ALD600; 1999(2)ALT747

petitioner is the Director of the first petitioner agency. It was incorporated in the year 1982 under the Companies Act, 1956. It is stated that it is a premier advertising agency in the Andhra Pradesh. It has been specialising … of the petitioners on the basis of the allotment order dated 5-5-1995. A show-cause notice dated 19-7-1997, under Sections 420 and 421 of the HMC Act (for short 'Act') was issued. Since the reply submitted by the

Moser Baer Karamchari Union Thr. President Mahesh Chand Sharma Vs. Uni ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Preferential Payments and also the framing of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. 3.1 It is submitted that the Companies Act, 1956, as it existed prior to the Companies (Amendment) Act, 1985, did not provide for any “overriding preferential payments” … writ petitioner - Moser Baer Karamchari Union have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction or order striking down Section 327(7) of the Companies Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as “Act, 2013”) as arbitrary and violative of Article

Major General Shanta Shamsher Jung Bahadur Rana Vs. Kamani Brothers Pr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 42, 43 and 54; Indian Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(26), 2(30), 36, 189, 284, 314, 316(3) and 651; Indian Contract Act - Sections 193 and 203; Constitutional Law; Administrative Law; Criminal Law; Private Law; Public Law; High Court Rules- Rule 601

Reported in : AIR1959Bom201; (1958)60BOMLR1024; [1959]29CompCas501(Bom)

the grade of Rs. 2,000-10-2500 plus rent free house.' 6. On the 1st of April, 1956 the Indian Companies Act, 1956 came into operation. As the plaintiff held an office of profit and as Section 314 of the said … to management, the ownership being in the deity, in K.R. Swaminatha Iyer v. A. Ramier, AIR 1925 Mad 421. Mr. Bhatt also cited Chapsey v. Jethabhai, 9 Bom LR 514, where the plaintiff and the defendant were

Rajeev Kapur and Others Vs. Grentex and Company Private Limited and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

1. The above Appeal is filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 (“the Act”). By the above Appeal, the Appellants have impugned the order passed by the Company Law Board, … 5 have relied on the decisions in: (i) Hanuman Prasad Bagri vs. Bagress Cereals, (12001 (4) SCC 420, 421) (ii) In re. Lundie Bros (2(1965 (35) CC 827 CD 833) ;and (iii) Sangramsiunh Gaikwad vs. Shantidevi Gaikwad

Official Liquidator Vs. T. Sudarsan and ors.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(30), 433, 478, 519, 542, 543, 545 and 620A; Companies (Court) Rules, 1959 - Rules 130, 260 and 261

Reported in : [2003]116CompCas88(Mad); [2004]49SCL694(Mad)

liquidation seeking for an order to discharge them from the proceedings under Sections 542 and 543 of the Companies Act, 1956, initiated by the official liquidator in Company Application No. 888 of 1995 in Company Petition No. 88 of … Muralidhar, ex-directors of the company in liquidation seeking for an order to discharge them from the proceedings under Sections 542 and 543 of the Companies Act, 1956, initiated by the official liquidator in Company Application No. 888

Reliance Industries Limited Rep. by Reliance Consultancy Services Limi ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : LimitationCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 9, Rule 13; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 108; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : (2001)2MLJ734

certificates are issued. Then again she has given a letter under the provisions of Section 108 of the Companies Act,1956 addressed to the petitioner for issue of duplicate shares and this is also dated November 1998. Therefore, it … The petitioner filed the application to set aside the ex parte decree on 1.3.1999 with a delay of 421 days. The reason given for the delay was not accepted by the Court below. Therefore, the civil revision

Malanpur Steel Ltd. Vs. Crb Capital Markets Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

a pari passu charge in favour of the workmen to the extent of the workmens portion. Furthermore, under Section 421 of the Companies Act, 1956, notwithstanding anything contained in any other provision of the said Act or any … MC of the RBI Act should be read with the provisions of Sections 430, 529, 529A of the Companies Act, 1956. Section 45 MC of the RBI Act reads as under:45-MC. Power of Bank to file winding-up petition. (1) The