Advanced Search Results

Laljibhai C. Kapadia Vs. Lalji B. Desai

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 2(13), 172, 172(1), 173, 173(1), 173(2), 173(3), 252, 255, 256, 256(1), 256(2), 257, 258, 259, 260, 262, 263, 263(1), 263(2), 264, 264(1), 264(2), 294(2) and 358

Reported in : [1973]43CompCas17(Bom)

consider the various points urged before me, it is desirable to refer to the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, and the articles of association of respondent No. 3 - company. 11. Section 2(13) of the Companies Act … as directors was illegal, void and of no effect as they had not filed letters of consent under section 264(1) of the Act in respect of their proposed appointment as directors at the annual general meeting. The plaintiffs,

Laljibhai C. Kapadia and anr. Vs. Lalji B. Desai and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 172, 172(1), 173, 173(1), 173(2), 256, 257, 258, 260, 264, 264(1), 264(2) and 396(1); ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100 - Order 6, Rule 4

Reported in : AIR1972Bom276; (1972)74BOMLR85; ILR1972Bom917

consider the various points urged before me, it is desirable to refer to the relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and the Articles of Association of Respondent 3 company.11.Section 2(13) of the companies Act defines 'director', as any … as directors was illegal, void and of no effect as they had not filed letters of consent under Section 264(1) of the Act in respect of their proposed appointment as directors at the Annual General Meeting. The plaintiffs,

A.B.L. Garg Vs. Registrar of Companies

Court : Delhi

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 264(1)(3)

Reported in : 2002(63)DRJ3

which is treated as lead case, are these - Complaint under Section 162 read with Section 220(3) of Companies Act, 1956 (for short the 'Act') was filed by the Registrar of Companies (Delhi & Haryana), complainant/respondent against M/s. Malhotra … Director of accused No. 1-company. In support of submission, my attention was drawn to the provision contained in Section 264(1) of the Act as also the fact that Form No. 32 submitted with the respondent was not signed

B. Sivaraman and Others Vs. Egmore Benefit Society Ltd.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 6, 169, 173, 177, 178, 179, 184, 189, 193, 194, 195, 257, 257(1A), 263, 264, 284 and 505

Reported in : [1992]75CompCas198(Mad)

first respondent company. At this juncture, it will be worth referring to sections 193 to 195 of the Companies Act, 1956, as amended up-to- date. '193. (1) Every company shall cause minutes of all proceedings of every general meeting … the company by its chairman and which was duly intimated to the Registrar of Companies, as contemplated under section 264 of the Companies Act, clearly and totally is in favour of the applicants herein and unless and until

C.R. Priyachandrakumar and Others Vs. Purasawalkam Permanent Fund Ltd. ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 173, 173(2), 179, 193, 195, 257, 260, 264(1), 290, 309 and 309(2)

Reported in : [1995]83CompCas150(Mad)

respondent and a sum of Rs. 500 was not paid under the provisions of section 257 of the Companies Act, 1956. 5. It is contended that one Gopalratnam, a director of the first respondent, resigned his post and in … willing to act as director, if so appointed and has filed with the fund his consent under section 264(1) of the Companies Act, 1956. None of the directors except Thiru N. G. Manavalan is interested in the

Baroda Board and Paper Mills Ltd. (In Liquidation) Vs. Income-tax Offi ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Company

Acts : Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 132, 132(1), 156, 230, 264, 528, 529, 530, 530(1), 530(1) and 530(8)

Reported in : [1976]102ITR153(Guj); [1976]37STC339(Guj)

any other law for the time being in force. The reference is to the provisions of the Indian Companies Act, 1956. Section 530(1)(a) of that Act grants priority for the tax due to the Government, only in so far as … American Bank v. The Company, Lord Hanworth M.R. observed : 'I think the words 'due and payable' in section 264 of the Companies Act are meant to refer to a liability in respect of which there had to

Gopal Glass Works Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Income-tax Act, 1961 - Sections 40, 44AB, 80HHC, 80HHD, 80R, 80RR, 80RRA(1), 139, 139(9), 264 and 264(1); Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 2; Compulsory Deposit Scheme (Income-tax Payers) Act, 1974; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 233B

Reported in : (2001)165CTR(Guj)620; [2001]252ITR354(Guj)

and, where an audit of cost accounts of the assessee has been conducted, under Section 233B of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956), also the report under that section ;(f) where regular books of account are not maintained … petitioner-company has raised a challenge against the order dated July 29, 1992, passed by the respondent, under Section 264(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ('the I.T. Act'), whereby, the revision petition, which pertained to the assessment year

Rbf Rig Corpn. Lic (Rbfrc) as Agent Vs. Asstt. Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (2008)297ITR228(Delhi)

the option of the employer, on behalf of such employee, notwithstanding anything contained in Section 200 of the Companies Act, 1956 (1 of 1956).He, thereafter, drew our attention to provision of Section 17(2) defining 'perquisite' in an inclusive definition, … appellant had placed reliance on the judgment of Uttranchal High Court in the case of ONGC reported in 264 ITR 340 to support that multiple grossing for tax. calculation was not justified. The learned CIT (Appeals) held

Roadmaster Industries of India (P) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant Commi ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 214(1A), 244(1A) and 264; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 111(3); Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Sections 30; Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 54 and 56; Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136 and 227

Reported in : (2006)204CTR(P& H)213; [2008]303ITR138(P& H)

an order passed by the Central Government in exercise of its appellate powers under Section 111(3) of the Companies Act, 1956, in the matter of refusal of a company to register the transfer of shares, Hon'ble the Supreme Court … June, 1989, copy Annex. P-10, passed by the CIT, Patiala, whereby revision petitions filed by the petitioner under Section 264 of the IT Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'), for the asst. yrs. 1978-79, 1979-80, 1980-81 were dismissed

Bhagudeo Flour Mills P. Ltd. Vs. O.L. of Disha Agro Industries Ltd. an ...

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Company

Acts : State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - Sections 29 and 32E; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 433, 434, 529, 529A, 530, 531, 531A and 531(1)

Reported in : [2009]148CompCas828(Guj)

filed Company Petition No. 264 of 2000 against Disha Agro Industries under Sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, for winding up the said company on the ground that the said company had failed and neglected to … India and failed to repay the financial assistance. The GSFC, in exercise of powers conferred upon it under Section 29 of the State Financial Corporations Act took over the possession of Disha Agro Industries land and building.6.