Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: command areas development act 1980 section 35 · Page 1 of about 241 results (0.064 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 18 2000

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-18-2000

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 4, 5(2) and 6; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958; National Environmental Policy Act, 1969; Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 98; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32 and 262; Endangered Species Act, 1973

Reported in : AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

the project affected families were provided irrigation facilities in the Sardar Sarovar Project command area or in the command areas of other irrigation projects. In many of the out of command sites, irrigated lands were purchased. In cases … into the sea. Inspite of the huge potential, there was hardly any development of the Narmada water resources prior to independence.3. In 1946, the then … reservoir filling.iv) The Department should be kept informed of progress on various works periodically.6. Approval under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 for diversion of forest land will be obtained separately. Mo work should be initiated on forest area prior … stretch is in Madhya Pradesh and the next 35 km. stretch of the river forms the boundary … State of Gujarat made a complaint to the Government of India under Section 3 of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 stating that a water

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 28 2003

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Decided on : Feb-28-2003

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)93ITD184(Nag.)

Matched in: Parties Vidarbha Irrigation Development Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 2007

Dr. P. Sitapati Rao S/O. P. Hanumantha Rao Vs. Institution of Lokayukt ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-31-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Lok Ayukta and Upa-Lok Ayukta Act, 1983 - Sections 2 and 10; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 (Fasli); Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001 - Sections 28; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 226, 309, 310 and 311; Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh Act, 1966 - Sections 4

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD451; 2008(2)ALT309

P. Sitapati Rao, hitherto the Additional Director General (Irrigation), National Academy of Construction and Ex-officio Advisor, Irrigation & Command Area Development Department of the Government of A.P. has filed these two writ petitions. In W.P. No. 5563 … The object underlying it was to cater to the postal needs of the rural communities dispersed in remote areas. The system availed of the services of schoolmasters, shopkeepers, landlords and such other persons in a village who … petition, the petitioner states that he worked in the Irrigation Department from 1980 till he superannuated in the year 1993 as the Chief Engineer, that … Government could exercise under Section 28 of Act 35 of 2001 was only at the inception and … Section 2(k)(iii) and 2(k)(V)(4) of the A.P. Lok Ayukta and Upa-Lok Ayukta Act, 1983, (hereinafter referred to as Act 11 of 1983), and as amenable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 06 1998

G. Umadevi Vs. Bangalore Development Authority, Bangalore and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-06-1998

Subject : Property

Acts : Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 - Sections 13 and38; Bangalore Development Authority (Amendment) Act, 1994 - Sections 5; Constitution of India - Articles 226; Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 9 and 10; Karnataka Regularisation of Unauthorised Construction in Urban Areas Act, 1991; City Improvement Trust Board Act, 1945; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 4

Reported in : 1998(5)KarLJ199

Matched in: Parties G. Umadevi Vs. Bangalore Development Authority, Bangalore and Others

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 1991

M. Srinivasulu Reddy Vs. State Inspector of Police, Anti Corruption Bu ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-27-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120-B, 420, 477-A; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1) and 5(2)

Reported in : 1991(3)ALT542; 1993CriLJ558

Criminal Procedure 1898 and Section 6(1)(b) of the Prevention of Corruption 1948 for prosecution - Accorded. Irrigation and Command Area Development (Ser. IV) Department. G.O.Ms No. 382. dt. 16-8-86. ORDER. Whereas it is alleged that Sri D. … from time to time. The measurements on widths cannot be accurate. Therefore, the measurements of widths and the areas calculated are based on the above widths cannot be compared by the measurements recorded by the accused. If … relate the works in this case as they are completed prior to 1980 and it only refers to certain secret tenders conducted in Nellore South … under S. 5(2) read with S. 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and laid the charge-sheet before the Special Judge for SPE and ACB … extent of 23,000/- sq. Metres, and for uprooting 3500 stumps of other kinds of trees including stacking

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2005

Gurpreet Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-09-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 18, 23(1A) and 54

Reported in : (2006)142PLR277

learned counsel argued that when there is a property with the potentiality of more profitable use, it will command better price than the property without such potential. He argued that the District Judge was wrong to assess … that the State of Punjab vide notification dated 19.4.1983 issued under Section 4 of the Act, acquired total area of land measuring 35 kanals 14 marlas in the revenue estate of village Boot, Tehsil and District Jalandhar, … in the revenue estate of village Boot, Tehsil and District Jalandhar, for development of a Municipal Park. However, while issuing declaration under Section 6 of … marked blue at the rate of Rs.32,000/- per marla in the year 1980. The acquired land could also be utilised for the construction of shops

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 2008

Barla Rami Reddy and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-21-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 4(1), 5A, 6, 12(2), 18, 36 and 59; Urban Areas (Development) Act, 1975 - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3A, 3A(1), 3(3), 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3), 12(4), 12(6), 13, 13(1), 13(3), 13(4), 13(5), 18, 18(1), 18(2), 19, 19(1), 19(2), 20, 21, 31, 34, 38(1), 42, 47A, 49, 49(1), 50(1), 50(2), 55, 56, 56(1), 56(2) and 57; Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Land (Conversion for Non-Agricultural Purpose) Act, 2006; Punjab Town Improvement Act; Punjab Regional and Town Planning and Development Act, 1995; Madras State Housing Board Act, 1961 - Sections 3, Sections 35 to 69, 70, 71 and 72; Delhi Development Act, 1957 - Sections 12, 12(1), 12(2) and 15; Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - Sections 37; Bombay Land Requisition Act - Sections 6; Tow

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD752; 2008(3)ALT336

Matched in: Parties Barla Rami Reddy and ors. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by Its Prl. Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department and ors.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1996

Anil Kumar Khurana Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-09-1996

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 62(1996)DLT313

defiance of law on the premise that the law is not enforceable against them. The persons who can command some money and power tend to commit such offences with calculations and evil designs with the only motive … The writ petitions have been preferred by the purchasers of built up areas/ spaces in these buildings. (6) The main arguments were were addressed in … is also nothing on record to show that the improvement scheme was in existence in 1957 when Delhi Development Act, 1957 was enacted. (29) Admittedly the lease deed stipulates that the land and building erected thereon should not … to our notice the following decisions of the Supreme Court:- 1. : 1980CriLJ684 , The Advocate General, State of Bihar v. M/s. Madhya Pradesh Khair … the provisions of an improvement scheme sanctioned under Section 42 of the U.P.Town Improvement Act. There is … by Craies in his book 7th Edn. page 355, which reads as under:- 'The general rule as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2016

A.V. Shakuntala Vs. The Union of India, Represented by its Union Secre ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-01-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

'Mineral Concession Rules, 2016'). 4. The petitioners in these writ petitions have sought a writ of mandamus to command the respondents to comply with Section 10A(2)(c) of the MMDR Act, 1957 and grant mining leases over certain … 10A(2)(c) of the MMDR Act, 1957 and grant mining leases over certain areas. 5. We have heard Mr.S.Ganesh, learned senior advocate along with Mr.K.N.Srinivasa, advocate … the State Government as per the terms and conditions of the Mine Development and Production Agreement, published by the Government of India in the Ministry … to the R-1 for the issue of Prior Approval Of Forest Clearance U/S 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 for the Schedule mining area to enable the R-3 and 5 to grant the Mining Lease in favour … Act 1957 and grant the mining lease over 35 Hectares in Sy no 166 at Aihole Village,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 01 2016

Smt a v Shakuntala Vs. The Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Dec-01-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

‘Mineral Concession Rules, 2016’).4. 7 The petitioners in these writ petitions have sought a writ of mandamus to command the respondents to comply with Section 10A(2)(c) of the MMDR Act, 1957 and grant mining leases over certain … the State Government as per the terms and conditions of the Mine Development and Production Agreement, published by the Government of India in the Ministry … OF MANDAMUS TO THE R-1 FOR THE ISSUE OF PRIOR APPROVAL OF FOREST CLEARANCE U/S2OF THE FOREST CONSERVATION ACT, 1980 FOR THE SCHEDULE MINING AREA TO ENABLE THE R-3 & 5 TO GRANT THE MINING LEASE IN FAVOUR … we are unable to accept such contention. 25 35. Rule 8 of the Mineral Concession Rules, 2016, … 10A(2)(c) of the MMDR Act, 1957 and grant mining leases over certain areas.5. We have heard Mr.S.Ganesh, learned senior advocate along with Mr.K.N.Srinivasa, advocate and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial