Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: command areas development act 1980 section 23 · Page 1 of about 452 results (0.082 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 18 2000

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-18-2000

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 4, 5(2) and 6; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958; National Environmental Policy Act, 1969; Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 98; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32 and 262; Endangered Species Act, 1973

Reported in : AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

the project affected families were provided irrigation facilities in the Sardar Sarovar Project command area or in the command areas of other irrigation projects. In many of the out of command sites, irrigated lands were purchased. In cases … into the sea. Inspite of the huge potential, there was hardly any development of the Narmada water resources prior to independence.3. In 1946, the then … reservoir filling.iv) The Department should be kept informed of progress on various works periodically.6. Approval under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 for diversion of forest land will be obtained separately. Mo work should be initiated on forest area prior … State of Gujarat made a complaint to the Government of India under Section 3 of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 stating that a water … issues of law and by its decision dated 23rd February, 1972, the said issues were decided against

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2005

Gurpreet Singh and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-09-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 4, 6, 18, 23(1A) and 54

Reported in : (2006)142PLR277

learned counsel argued that when there is a property with the potentiality of more profitable use, it will command better price than the property without such potential. He argued that the District Judge was wrong to assess … in the revenue estate of village Boot, Tehsil and District Jalandhar, for development of a Municipal Park. However, while issuing declaration under Section 6 of … marked blue at the rate of Rs.32,000/- per marla in the year 1980. The acquired land could also be utilised for the construction of shops … that the State of Punjab vide notification dated 19.4.1983 issued under Section 4 of the Act, acquired total area of land measuring 35 kanals 14 marlas in the revenue estate of village Boot, Tehsil and District Jalandhar, … Act, till the award in accordance with Section 23(1-A) of the Act, solatium at the rate of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 2007

Dr. P. Sitapati Rao S/O. P. Hanumantha Rao Vs. Institution of Lokayukt ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-31-2007

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Lok Ayukta and Upa-Lok Ayukta Act, 1983 - Sections 2 and 10; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 (Fasli); Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001 - Sections 28; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 226, 309, 310 and 311; Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh Act, 1966 - Sections 4

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD451; 2008(2)ALT309

P. Sitapati Rao, hitherto the Additional Director General (Irrigation), National Academy of Construction and Ex-officio Advisor, Irrigation & Command Area Development Department of the Government of A.P. has filed these two writ petitions. In W.P. No. 5563 … The object underlying it was to cater to the postal needs of the rural communities dispersed in remote areas. The system availed of the services of schoolmasters, shopkeepers, landlords and such other persons in a village who … petition, the petitioner states that he worked in the Irrigation Department from 1980 till he superannuated in the year 1993 as the Chief Engineer, that … Section 2(k)(iii) and 2(k)(V)(4) of the A.P. Lok Ayukta and Upa-Lok Ayukta Act, 1983, (hereinafter referred to as Act 11 of 1983), and as amenable

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 12 2002

Vijay Bihari Srivastava Vs. U.P. Postal Primary Co-operative Bank Ltd. ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Sep-12-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 - Sections 35, 37, 38, 70, 121, 122 and 128; Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Employees Service Regulations, 1975 - Regulations 84 and 85

Reported in : (2003)1UPLBEC1

referred to here-in-abovc particularly the latest one in U.P. State Co-operative Land Development Bank Ltd. v. Chandra Bhan Dubey (supra).'11. The Division Bench questioned the … connection with the affairs of the Society or any documents filed by the Society under the Act; Under. Section 23 of the Act where the Registrar is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient so to … reliefs :(i) issue a writ of mandamus or a writ, order of direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the opposite parties to allow the petitioner to function on the post of Secretary in the Bank.(ii) issue … the petitioner is that the Bank is a primary Co-operative Society, whose area of operation is extended to more than one district. The Head Office

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 27 1991

M. Srinivasulu Reddy Vs. State Inspector of Police, Anti Corruption Bu ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-27-1991

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120-B, 420, 477-A; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1) and 5(2)

Reported in : 1991(3)ALT542; 1993CriLJ558

Criminal Procedure 1898 and Section 6(1)(b) of the Prevention of Corruption 1948 for prosecution - Accorded. Irrigation and Command Area Development (Ser. IV) Department. G.O.Ms No. 382. dt. 16-8-86. ORDER. Whereas it is alleged that Sri D. … from time to time. The measurements on widths cannot be accurate. Therefore, the measurements of widths and the areas calculated are based on the above widths cannot be compared by the measurements recorded by the accused. If … relate the works in this case as they are completed prior to 1980 and it only refers to certain secret tenders conducted in Nellore South … under S. 5(2) read with S. 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and laid the charge-sheet before the Special Judge for SPE and ACB … retired on superannuation on 30-4-1983 but died on 23-12-1986 and hence the case against him was abated.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 22 1997

K. Venkat Ram Reddy and Others Vs. Hyderabad Urban Development Authori ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-22-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Andhra Pradesh Urban Areas (Development) Act, 1975 - Sections 33

Reported in : AIR1997AP368; 1997(3)ALT428

over Saroornagar residential complex to it. The Hyderabad Urban Development Authority under Section 33 of the A.P. Urban Areas (Development) Act, 1975 also passed a resolution No. 9 in its 16th meeting held on 25-1-1980 resolving to transfer the … activities, has developed a residential complex at Saroornagar over an area of 23 acres situated at Ranga Rcddy district. The complex contained certain infrastructure facilities … ORDERG. Bikshapathy, J. 1. The petitioners approached this Court for issue of writ of mandamus compelling the respondent to leave 60 fts. wide road from Hyderabad --Vijayawada National High Way to the colony

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 18 2001

Assistant Engineer Vs. Babulal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Jan-18-2001

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 25F and 25N

Reported in : [2001(89)FLR807]; (2001)ILLJ1234Raj; 2001WLC(Raj)UC87

issued by the State Government through which certain divisions of the Irrigation Department were abolished which included the Command Area Development Irrigation Circle-I, Kota in which the respondents were working. As the respondent-workmen were surplus employees, they … by the State Government through which certain divisions of the Irrigation Department were abolished which included the Command Area Development Irrigation Circle-I, Kota in which the respondents were working. As the respondent-workmen were surplus employees, they were … the State Government vide its order dated July 23, 1989 made a reference to the Labour Court, … that there has been non-compliance of Section 25N of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the ID Act') and there was also … given in the table:NameDate ofappointmentDate of Semi permanent1.BabulalNov. 19761.1.792.JagannathSept. 19761.1.793.RamkanwariJuly. 19761.1.794.ChandJune. 1978June, 19805.KanhayalalJune, 1978June, 1980They were retrenched from service w.e.f. May 31, 1983 without any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 01 1992

Usman Gani J. Khatri of Bombay and ors. Vs. Cantonment Board and Other ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-01-1992

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 43A, 179, 181(6), 186, 274 and 283; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1937 - Rule 2

Reported in : AIR1994SC233; JT1992(4)SC538; 1992(1)SCALE1068; (1992)3SCC455; [1992]3SCR1; 1992(2)LC441(SC)

Pune is a recent example of how an unbridled Cantonment Board promoted development on a vastly larger scale than prevailed in the adjoining municipal areas, … 21.10.1983 clearly stated that in view of the new scheme of building restrictions imposed by the GOC-in-Chief, Southern Command w.e.f. 24.12.1982 the same will be made applicable to all the building applications which have not been sanctioned. … from existing or proposed road shall be as under:(i) For Streets4 m and above width 1.5 m.(ii) and areas where shops/commercial user exist/proposed 2.25 m.Second scheme of restrictions dated 26.3.1984 modifying the earlier order dated 24.12.1982 reads … resolved that the plans be sanctioned under Section 181 of the Cantonments Act, 1924 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') subject to AHO's No Objection. … in or about the late 1970's and early 1980's a large number of builders in order to … The Cantonment Executive officer by his letter dated 23rd December, 1983 received by the petitioner in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 09 1990

M/S. Subbhash Chander Kamlesh Kumar Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Mar-09-1990

Subject : Commercial Constitution

Acts : Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 5, 6, 6(1), 6(3), 7, 10, 13, 13(1), 15, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33-A, 33-B, 38 and 43; Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets (General) Rules, 1962 - Rules 2(9), 13, 17, 18(1), 23, 24, 24-B, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29(1), 29 (2), 29(7), 30, 31 and 31(9); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 141, 245, 246 and 265; Haryana Rural Development Act, 1986 - Sections 5 and 6(5); Punjab Rural Development Act, 1987; The Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1976; Punjab Agricultural Produce Market (Haryana Amendment and Validation) Act, 1980; Haryana Rural Development Fund Act, 1983; Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Markets Act, 1966 - Sections 7 (6); Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets

Reported in : AIR1990P& H259; (1990)98PLR666

of the State is divided into various market areas and was also declared as such under Section … to timber. Part III deals with CWP No. 121 of 1988 challenging the validity of the Haryana Rural Development Act, 1986 and CWP No, 821 of 1988 regarding the vires of the Punjab Rural Development Act, 1987.3. CWP … petitions, which were directed against the vires of the Punjab Agricultural Produce Market (Haryana Second Amendment and Validation) Act, 1980, were dismissed by a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court by order dated December 3, 1985. In doing … is to enforce the provisions of the Act, the Rules and the bye-laws in the notified market area. Section 23 is the charging section, and in so far as relevant, reads as under:'23. Levy of fees.-- A Committee … Writ Petition No. 2551 of 1988 the petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus against the respondents directing them not to levy market fee on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 1981

Maryland Vs. Louisiana

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-26-1981

Subject : Land Acquisition

Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." Art. VI, cl. 2. It is basic to this constitutional command that all conflicting state provisions be without effect. See McCulloch v. Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316, 316 U. S. … possesses paramount rights to lands beneath the Pacific Ocean seaward of California's low-water mark -- to the offshore areas adjacent to Louisiana. In 1953, Congress passed the Submerged Lands Act, 43 U.S.C. §§ 1301-1315, ceding any federal … 729 offshore drilling, has become commonplace. [ Footnote 1 ] Exploration and development of the OCS in the Gulf of Mexico have become large industries … Master has issued two reports. In the first report, dated May 14, 1980, the Special Master recommended that the Court approve the motions of New … applies to gas moving out of the State. Section 47:1303C of the Act declares that "the tax … Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co., 206 U. S. 230 (1907). See generally Note, The Original Jurisdiction of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial