Advanced Search Results

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 4, 5(2) and 6; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958; National Environmental Policy Act, 1969; Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 98; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32 and 262; Endangered Species Act, 1973

Reported in : AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

the project affected families were provided irrigation facilities in the Sardar Sarovar Project command area or in the command areas of other irrigation projects. In many of the out of command sites, irrigated lands were purchased. In cases … into the sea. Inspite of the huge potential, there was hardly any development of the Narmada water resources prior to independence.3. In 1946, the then … reservoir filling.iv) The Department should be kept informed of progress on various works periodically.6. Approval under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 for diversion of forest land will be obtained separately. Mo work should be initiated on forest area prior … State of Gujarat made a complaint to the Government of India under Section 3 of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 stating that a water … the construction of the dam continued and on 22nd February, 1994 the Ministry of Water Resources conveyed

Skipper Construction Co. (P) Ltd. and anr. Vs. Delhi Development Autho ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 43(1991)DLT636

the directions of the Central Government 'and as envisaged by sub-section (3) of Section 22 of the Delhi Development Act, read with Rules 45 (2) & (6) of the D.D.A (Disposal of Nazul Land) Rules, 1981. It was … the Statesman. The only dispute there was in regard to the refuge areas for fire protection, which was raised for the first time in the … other relevant considerations.'(4) The petitioners filed the present writ petition on 2.8 1989, praying for a writ of mandamus directing respondent D. DA. to sanction the building plan forthwith, or in the alternative to grant permission to

M/S. Tci Industries Ltd. and Another Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

permissible constructions, heights, restrictions and exemptions. They operate at a very detailed and a granular level within their command areas. Indeed, this is their statutory mandate, as Section 22 of the MRTP Act makes clear. That section says … planning authority - in this case, the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (“MCGM”) - to prepare a draft Development Plan (Section 21). This is to be sanctioned by the State Government following a statutorily mandated procedure. A … a history that dates back now some three decades to the early 1980s when the then Prime Minister, Ms Indira Gandhi, initiated action to protect

Shital Kumar Vaish Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1998(1)AWC94

Dev Kant Trivedi, JJ. 1. Aggrieved mainly by the non-absorption of the petitioner with the department of Ramganga Command Area Development Authority and the repatriation order dated 28.2.1983 by which the petitioner has been directed to join … Kant Trivedi, JJ. 1. Aggrieved mainly by the non-absorption of the petitioner with the department of Ramganga Command Area Development Authority and the repatriation order dated 28.2.1983 by which the petitioner has been directed to join on … izrhr ugha gksrk gS**A7-4-1980^mi;ZqDrfo'k;d vkids i= la[;k & ih-bZ-vkj-ch-&1@3356 fnukWad 22 Qjojh] 1980ds lanHkZ esa eq>s ;g dgus dk funsZ'k gqvk gS fd Jh ,l-ds- … and he would be relieved with effect from 28.2.1983.10. Aggrieved by the action of the respondents, the petitioner filed the present writ petition and obtained … parent department only. - CANTONMENTS ACT[C.A. No. 41/2006]. Section 346 & Cantonment Fund (Servants Rules, 1937, Rules

Anil Kumar Khurana Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Property

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 62(1996)DLT313

Rules, 1962, Rule 237 where the Dda is to maintain two Registers, Register B and Register A; (b) Section 22 of the Delhi Development Act 1957 and guidelines issued by Land Management published by D.D.A. on 27.1.1992. (22) … that the law is not enforceable against them. The persons who can command some money and power tend to commit such offences with calculations and … The writ petitions have been preferred by the purchasers of built up areas/ spaces in these buildings. (6) The main arguments were were addressed in … is also nothing on record to show that the improvement scheme was in existence in 1957 when Delhi Development Act, 1957 was enacted. (29) Admittedly the lease deed stipulates that the land and building erected thereon should not … following decisions of the Supreme Court:- 1. : 1980CriLJ684 , The Advocate General, State of Bihar v.

Anil Kumar Khurana Vs. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 14; Delhi Development Authorities Act, 1957 - Sections 12; Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 - Sections 343

Reported in : 1996IAD(Delhi)749; 1996(36)DRJ558; 1996RLR140

transferred from the control of the Land & Development Office to Dda certain nazul lands for management under Section 22 of the Delhi Development Act subject to the condition that the Authority shall not make or cause or … argument about the comparison of some multi-storeyed commercial flats in some residential areas is not at all tenable. Because it would depend upon the Master … construction of the buildings in the city, the learned senior counsel submitted that section 7 of the Delhi Development Act provides for the framing of the Master Plan. Section 8 provides for the planning of Zonal DevelopmentPlan. As … to see if the petitioner can be assisted by issuing a writ commanding the respondent institution to issue similar transfer certificate to the petitioner. Suffice … following decisions of the Supreme Court:- 1. : 1980CriLJ684 , The Advocate General, State of Bihar vs.

Dr. P. Sitapati Rao S/O. P. Hanumantha Rao Vs. Institution of Lokayukt ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Lok Ayukta and Upa-Lok Ayukta Act, 1983 - Sections 2 and 10; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 (Fasli); Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001 - Sections 28; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 226, 309, 310 and 311; Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh Act, 1966 - Sections 4

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD451; 2008(2)ALT309

P. Sitapati Rao, hitherto the Additional Director General (Irrigation), National Academy of Construction and Ex-officio Advisor, Irrigation & Command Area Development Department of the Government of A.P. has filed these two writ petitions. In W.P. No. 5563 … The object underlying it was to cater to the postal needs of the rural communities dispersed in remote areas. The system availed of the services of schoolmasters, shopkeepers, landlords and such other persons in a village who … petition, the petitioner states that he worked in the Irrigation Department from 1980 till he superannuated in the year 1993 as the Chief Engineer, that … Section 2(k)(iii) and 2(k)(V)(4) of the A.P. Lok Ayukta and Upa-Lok Ayukta Act, 1983, (hereinafter referred to as Act 11 of 1983), and as amenable … did not necessitate interference in proceedings under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.IS THE NATIONAL ACADEMY

M. Srinivasulu Reddy Vs. State Inspector of Police, Anti Corruption Bu ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120-B, 420, 477-A; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1) and 5(2)

Reported in : 1991(3)ALT542; 1993CriLJ558

Criminal Procedure 1898 and Section 6(1)(b) of the Prevention of Corruption 1948 for prosecution - Accorded. Irrigation and Command Area Development (Ser. IV) Department. G.O.Ms No. 382. dt. 16-8-86. ORDER. Whereas it is alleged that Sri D. … from time to time. The measurements on widths cannot be accurate. Therefore, the measurements of widths and the areas calculated are based on the above widths cannot be compared by the measurements recorded by the accused. If … relate the works in this case as they are completed prior to 1980 and it only refers to certain secret tenders conducted in Nellore South … under S. 5(2) read with S. 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and laid the charge-sheet before the Special Judge for SPE and ACB … Irrigation Circle, Nellore, also submitted a report on 22-10-1981 to the Chief Engineer, Major Irrigation and Minor

Gaurav Kumar Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

32 of the Constitution.99. In Mohammad Yasin (supra), the United Provinces Town Areas Act 1914 empowered the Town Area Committee to charge fees for the … fees must flow from the express authority of law. In Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority v. Sharadkumar Jayantikumar Pasawalla45 this Court observed: “7. […]. In our … qualifications and conditions for a person to be admitted as an advocate.7 5 Section 25, Advocates Act 6 Section 22, Advocates Act 7 Section 24, Advocates Act [It reads:24. Persons who may be admitted as advocates on a … Section 12. 70 Indian Express Newspapers (Bombay) (P) Ltd v. Union of India, (1985) 1 SCC641[75].; General Officer Commanding-in-Chief v. Subhash Chandra Yadav, (1988) 2 SCC352[14].. 71 Rajnarain Singh v. Patna Administration Committee, (1954) 2 SCC82[32]. 72

Rajasthan Nahar Rashtriya Mazdoor Union and anr. Vs. State of Rajastha ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1992WLN(UC)113

Union is a union of the employees employed under the Government of Rajasthan in the Rajasthan Canal Project Command Area Development (R.C.P.) and is registered under the Unions Act, 1926. Petitioner No.2 is the Vice President of … is a union of the employees employed under the Government of Rajasthan in the Rajasthan Canal Project Command Area Development (R.C.P.) and is registered under the Unions Act, 1926. Petitioner No.2 is the Vice President of the … of Rajasthan, In the Finance Department, vide his letter dated June 2' 1980 addressed to the Chief Accounts Officer, R.C.P., CAD, Bikaner (Ann. 11) directed … other Government servants. According to the petitioners, the settlement (Ann.4) was under Section 18 of the Industrial Disputes Act and has the binding effect, according … it was submitted that the clarification issued on 22.8.79 was not binding on the respondents.12. I have