Advanced Search Results

State of Orissa and ors. Vs. Mesco Steels Ltd. and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mineral Concession Rules, 1960 - Rules 27(3), 26(1); Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 - Section 30; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Section 2

subject to the State Government ensuring compliance of the amended provisions of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957 and the Rules made thereunder besides the provisions of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and Notification dated … of the project and the grant of a no objection by the Ministry of Environment and Forest under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. The order passed by the High Court could to that extent be … August, 1991, the Government of Orissa de-reserved and threw open Iron/Manganese Ore areas spreading over 282.46 square miles in five blocks located in Keonjhar and … to Joint Secretary to Government of Orissa quashed and by writ of mandamus the State Government directed to execute a mining lease for an area

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Through Chief S ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2008MP142; 2008(2)MPHT490

families. Paragraph 2 of the R&R; Plan of the Government of M.P. is extracted herein below:2.0 Resettlement:The total command areas of the dam comprises of 617 villages covering service area of 1.468 Lakh Ha. in Barwaha, Maheshwar, Kasrawad, … Dewas districts of Madhya Pradesh by letter dated 31st August, 2004 under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 subject to the conditions stipulated therein and condition No. 5 stipulated that displaced shall be resettled on non-forest … Omkareshwar Dam was prepared by the Government of Madhya Pradesh, Narmada Valley Development Department. In this Project report, Omkareshwar Dam is described as one of

A.V. Shakuntala Vs. The Union of India, Represented by its Union Secre ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

to the R-1 for the issue of Prior Approval Of Forest Clearance U/S 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 for the Schedule mining area to enable the R-3 and 5 to grant the Mining Lease in favour … 2016, seeking a writ of mandamus to the forest authorities to issue prior approval of forest clearance under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980. 13. The Respondent No.3, the Director, Mines and Geology Department in a … petitioners in these writ petitions have sought a writ of mandamus to command the respondents to comply with Section 10A(2)(c) of the MMDR Act, 1957 … 10A(2)(c) of the MMDR Act, 1957 and grant mining leases over certain areas. 5. We have heard Mr.S.Ganesh, learned senior advocate along with Mr.K.N.Srinivasa, advocate … per the terms and conditions of the Mine Development and Production Agreement, published by the Government of

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)93ITD184(Nag.)

the Act extends. He brought to our notice that the Schedule refers to Catchments area, submergence area and command area of the 10 irrigation projects within the geographical limits of the Districts specified against each of them. … purposes and take away a part of the government affairs in local areas. They are political subdivisions and agencies which exercise a part of State … case of Union of India v. R.C. Jain (supra). He referred to the various provisions of the Delhi Development Act, 1957 which was the subject matter in R.C. Jain's case (supra) and sought to compare the said provisions … decision of the Tribunal in respect of the assessment years 1977-78 and 1980-81 and that of the assessing authority for the assessment year 1984-85. In … The Assessee made such a claim since under Section 10(20) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter … case of Madras Industrial Investment Corporation v. CIT 225 ITR 802 (SC) and such expenditure was to

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 4, 5(2) and 6; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958; National Environmental Policy Act, 1969; Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 98; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32 and 262; Endangered Species Act, 1973

Reported in : AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

the project affected families were provided irrigation facilities in the Sardar Sarovar Project command area or in the command areas of other irrigation projects. In many of the out of command sites, irrigated lands were purchased. In cases … into the sea. Inspite of the huge potential, there was hardly any development of the Narmada water resources prior to independence.3. In 1946, the then … reservoir filling.iv) The Department should be kept informed of progress on various works periodically.6. Approval under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 for diversion of forest land will be obtained separately. Mo work should be initiated on forest area prior … State of Gujarat made a complaint to the Government of India under Section 3 of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 stating that a water … extend irrigation to a further area of over 20 lakh acres. Accordingly, explorations for locating a more

Rajappan V. K vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

without obtaining permission from the authorities in view of the provisions under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. There are three ponds near the shed of the 6th respondent Sangham at Karimala Thavalam. The Sangham was … it is stated that the petitioner, being a member of Karimala Eco- Development Committee, has been allotted a stall by the ForestDepartment in Karimala Thavalam, … Director, has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus commanding respondents 1 to 5 to take necessary steps to ensure that there is no collection of money by … BharathaAyyappa Seva Sangham cannot conduct Annadhanam at Karimala, which is a forest area, without obtaining permission from the authorities in view of the provisions under

Ram Ganga Command Area Development Authority and anr. Vs. Sheetal Kuma ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Reported in : AIR2003SC1340; 2003(4)ALT54(SC); 2003(3)AWC1825(SC); (2003)3CALLT8(SC); [2003(97)FLR322]; 2003(1)JKJ635[SC]; JT2003(3)SC151; 2003(3)SCALE165; (2003)9SCC32; [2003]2SCR958

the parties and ultimately come to the conclusion that the employee was in substantive employment with Ram Ganga Command Area Development Project (hereinafter referred to as the 'Project') and thereafter in the Ram Ganga Command Area Development … parties and ultimately come to the conclusion that the employee was in substantive employment with Ram Ganga Command Area Development Project (hereinafter referred to as the 'Project') and thereafter in the Ram Ganga Command Area Development Authority … Ramganga Command Project, Azad Nagar, Kanpur.Regional Development Department Section-1 Dated Lucknow: June the 4th, 1982Subject : Regarding … Service Tribunal (in short 'the Tribunal') questioning refusal of the increments in 1980. It is relevant to note that before the Tribunal, the State Government … working as Field Officer. The Milk Board by its letter dated 25.2.1977/1.3.1977 acted on the said request. The letter of the Milk Board is of

Exotic Granite Exports Rep. by Its Managing Partner Sri. K. Ramachandr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(1), 5 to 13, 15, 17, 17A(1) and 17A(2); Coal Mine Act; Andhra Pradesh Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 5, 11, 11(1) and 11(5); Right to Information Act (RTI), 2005; Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956; Andhra Pradesh Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1966 - Rule 12 and 12(5); Forest (Conservation) Rules 2003 - Rules 6, 6(1), 7, 11, 28, 59(1) and 61(6); Writ Proceedings Rules, 1977 - Rule 15; Mineral Concession Rules, 1949 - Rules 13 and 17; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 73, 154, 162, 226, 297 and 298

Reported in : 2009(5)ALT200

upheld by the Courts number of times. Very recently when Galaxy Granite areas had been reserved in favour of A.P. Mineral Development Corporation, the Division … Divisional Forest Officer, Warangal South, Warangal to process the said application under Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980. By and under the same proceedings, the Assistant Director requested the Divisional Forest Officer to depute the concerned … exploitation of mineral resources is also devoid of substance. Section 5 of the Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act empowers the Central Government to make rules for regulating the grant of mining leases or for prohibiting the … order or direction, more particularly one in the name of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the same is arbitrary, unreasonable, unjust, violative of the principles

Kalyan Gangathara Jawahar Vs. the Government of Tamil Nadu, Represente ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1997)2MLJ107

abundantly clear that the land in question still forms part of reserved forest and that being the position, Section 2 of the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980, definitely bars the State Government from granting lease or using the forest … include any work relating or ancillary to conservation, development and management of forests and wild life, namely, … of Forests (Wildlife) has recommended that the request of the lessee be rejected according to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 as no forest land can be diverted for non-forestry purposes. The Principal Chief Conservator of Forests has also … The petitioner has prayed for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records relating to the G.O. (1D) No. 44, … to ask for renewal, that reserve forest should be protected, that the area in question is being declared as Wildlife Sanctuary and the activities carried

Smt a v Shakuntala Vs. The Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

petitioners in these writ petitions have sought a writ of mandamus to command the respondents to comply with Section 10A(2)(c) of the MMDR Act, 1957 … per the terms and conditions of the Mine Development and Production Agreement, published by the Government of … OF MANDAMUS TO THE R-1 FOR THE ISSUE OF PRIOR APPROVAL OF FOREST CLEARANCE U/S2OF THE FOREST CONSERVATION ACT, 1980 FOR THE SCHEDULE MINING AREA TO ENABLE THE R-3 & 5 TO GRANT THE MINING LEASE IN FAVOUR … 2016, seeking a writ of mandamus to the forest authorities to issue prior approval of forest clearance under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.13. The Respondent No.3, the Director, Mines and Geology Department in a communication … 10A(2)(c) of the MMDR Act, 1957 and grant mining leases over certain areas.5. We have heard Mr.S.Ganesh, learned senior advocate along with Mr.K.N.Srinivasa, advocate and