Advanced Search Results

State of Andhra Pradesh and anr. Vs. Marri Venkaiah and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : PropertyLimitation

Reported in : AIR2003SC2949; 2003(4)AWC2867(SC); 2003(4)CTC700; JT2003(6)SC179; 2003(5)SCALE480; (2003)7SCC280

4(1) was issued on 16.5.1980 for acquiring land situated in Garedepalli village of Nalgonda District for formation of Command Area Development Ayacut Road under Nagarjunasagar Project. The Land Acquisition Officer passed an award on 15.1.1982. Some of … land situated in Garedepalli village of Nalgonda District for formation of Command Area Development Ayacut Road under Nagarjunasagar Project. The Land Acquisition Officer passed an … passing of the award by the Civil Court to the persons interested, who had not sought reference under Section 18 of the Act, to make them know about the said award.4. That order is challenged by filing these

Brig. Gurdial Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1(1990)WLN(Rev)583

the matter of crop compensation at the earliest. A letter was also addressed by the Addl Chief Engineer, Command Area Development Rajasthan Canal Project, Bikaner to the Collector, Sri Ganganagar in this connection It was requested therein … earliest. A letter was also addressed by the Addl Chief Engineer, Command Area Development Rajasthan Canal Project, Bikaner to the Collector, Sri Ganganagar in this … Land Acquisition Officer and the Land Acquisition Officer vide award dated 19-12 1980 determined the amount of compensation to the tune of Rs. 2,28,220/-. As … the award. If the respondents intended to challenge the award they should have resorted to the remedy Under Section 18 of the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act for getting the reference made. That remedy has not been resorted to.

Rajasthan Nahar Rashtriya Mazdoor Union and anr. Vs. State of Rajastha ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1992WLN(UC)113

Union is a union of the employees employed under the Government of Rajasthan in the Rajasthan Canal Project Command Area Development (R.C.P.) and is registered under the Unions Act, 1926. Petitioner No.2 is the Vice President of … employed under the Government of Rajasthan in the Rajasthan Canal Project Command Area Development (R.C.P.) and is registered under the Unions Act, 1926. Petitioner No.2 … of Rajasthan, In the Finance Department, vide his letter dated June 2' 1980 addressed to the Chief Accounts Officer, R.C.P., CAD, Bikaner (Ann. 11) directed … second Saturday as permissible to all other Government servants. According to the petitioners, the settlement (Ann.4) was under Section 18 of the Industrial Disputes Act and has the binding effect, according to which the workcharged employees covered by

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : EnvironmentConstitution

Acts : Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Sections 3; Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 - Sections 2, 4, 5(2) and 6; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980; Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958; National Environmental Policy Act, 1969; Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 - Sections 98; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 21, 32 and 262; Endangered Species Act, 1973

Reported in : AIR2000SC3751; (2001)1GLR434; 2000(7)SCALE34; (2000)10SCC664; [2000]Supp4SCR94

the project affected families were provided irrigation facilities in the Sardar Sarovar Project command area or in the command areas of other irrigation projects. In many of the out of command sites, irrigated lands were purchased. In cases … into the sea. Inspite of the huge potential, there was hardly any development of the Narmada water resources prior to independence.3. In 1946, the then … reservoir filling.iv) The Department should be kept informed of progress on various works periodically.6. Approval under Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 for diversion of forest land will be obtained separately. Mo work should be initiated on forest area prior … State of Gujarat made a complaint to the Government of India under Section 3 of the Inter-State Water Disputes Act, 1956 stating that a water … reproduced below:11.1 In their meeting from 14th to 18th December, 1964 at which the State representatives were

Narmada Bachao Andolan Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh Through Chief S ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Reported in : AIR2008MP142; 2008(2)MPHT490

families. Paragraph 2 of the R&R; Plan of the Government of M.P. is extracted herein below:2.0 Resettlement:The total command areas of the dam comprises of 617 villages covering service area of 1.468 Lakh Ha. in Barwaha, Maheshwar, Kasrawad, … Omkareshwar Dam was prepared by the Government of Madhya Pradesh, Narmada Valley Development Department. In this Project report, Omkareshwar Dam is described as one of … Dewas districts of Madhya Pradesh by letter dated 31st August, 2004 under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980 subject to the conditions stipulated therein and condition No. 5 stipulated that displaced shall be resettled on non-forest … gates of the dam so as to achieve a water level of 189 meters at the dam site. The petitioner then filed the present writ

Vidarbha Irrigation Development Vs. Additional Commissioner of

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Nagpur

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (2005)93ITD184(Nag.)

our notice that the Schedule refers to Catchments area, submergence area and command area of the 10 irrigation projects within the geographical limits of the … purposes and take away a part of the government affairs in local areas. They are political subdivisions and agencies which exercise a part of State … case of Union of India v. R.C. Jain (supra). He referred to the various provisions of the Delhi Development Act, 1957 which was the subject matter in R.C. Jain's case (supra) and sought to compare the said provisions … vested in the Assessee by the VIDC Act clearly show that the Assessee is an autonomous body. Under Section 18 the Assessee has freedom in the mater of promoting and operating, planning, investigating, designing, constructing and managing irrigation … in respect of the assessment years 1977-78 and 1980-81 and that of the assessing authority for the

Dr. P. Sitapati Rao S/O. P. Hanumantha Rao Vs. Institution of Lokayukt ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Lok Ayukta and Upa-Lok Ayukta Act, 1983 - Sections 2 and 10; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Public Societies Registration Act, 1350 (Fasli); Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001 - Sections 28; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 45; Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 226, 309, 310 and 311; Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh Act, 1966 - Sections 4

Reported in : 2008(3)ALD451; 2008(2)ALT309

P. Sitapati Rao, hitherto the Additional Director General (Irrigation), National Academy of Construction and Ex-officio Advisor, Irrigation & Command Area Development Department of the Government of A.P. has filed these two writ petitions. In W.P. No. 5563 … The object underlying it was to cater to the postal needs of the rural communities dispersed in remote areas. The system availed of the services of schoolmasters, shopkeepers, landlords and such other persons in a village who … petition, the petitioner states that he worked in the Irrigation Department from 1980 till he superannuated in the year 1993 as the Chief Engineer, that … Section 2(k)(iii) and 2(k)(V)(4) of the A.P. Lok Ayukta and Upa-Lok Ayukta Act, 1983, (hereinafter referred to as Act 11 of 1983), and as amenable … advice under Section 45 of the Evidence Act, 1872, and that the government desired such expert advice

Narayandas Gupta Vs. the Special Officer (Town Planning Committee, Cor ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : PropertyCivil

Reported in : (1980)2MLJ39

Matched in: Citation (1980)2MLJ39

M. Srinivasulu Reddy Vs. State Inspector of Police, Anti Corruption Bu ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120-B, 420, 477-A; Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1) and 5(2)

Reported in : 1991(3)ALT542; 1993CriLJ558

Criminal Procedure 1898 and Section 6(1)(b) of the Prevention of Corruption 1948 for prosecution - Accorded. Irrigation and Command Area Development (Ser. IV) Department. G.O.Ms No. 382. dt. 16-8-86. ORDER. Whereas it is alleged that Sri D. … from time to time. The measurements on widths cannot be accurate. Therefore, the measurements of widths and the areas calculated are based on the above widths cannot be compared by the measurements recorded by the accused. If … relate the works in this case as they are completed prior to 1980 and it only refers to certain secret tenders conducted in Nellore South … under S. 5(2) read with S. 5(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act and laid the charge-sheet before the Special Judge for SPE and ACB … Accordingly he conducted an enquiry from 10-8-1981 to 18-8-1981 and from 17-9-1981 to 19-9-1981 and submitted his

Uma Engineering Company Vs. Chief Technical Examiner (Ce), Irrigation ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Freedom of Information Act, 2002 - Sections 8

Reported in : 2004(1)ALD620; II(2004)BC364

approved the recommendations made by the S.E.4. The petitioner approached the Secretary to the Government in Irrigation and Command Area Development Department on 4.1.1995. He also made request to the Hon'ble Minister for correction of the mistake … the recommendations made by the S.E.4. The petitioner approached the Secretary to the Government in Irrigation and Command Area Development Department on 4.1.1995. He also made request to the Hon'ble Minister for correction of the mistake on … the Constitution of India. She also relies on the Freedom of Information Act, 2002 (Central Act No. 5 of 2003, hereinafter called as 'the Act'). … learned Government Pleader for Irrigation Sri P. V. Sanjay Kumar, relies on Section 8 of the Act and submits that the note file is not … The petitioner therefore approached the Superintending Engineer on 18.4.1994 stating that bona fide mistake occurred in the