Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: colonial probates act 1892 section 6 · Page 1 of about 8 results (0.020 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 25 1955

Gyanambal Vs. Administrator-general of Madras

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-25-1955

Subject : FamilyProperty

Acts : Administrator-General's Act, 1913 - Sections 28

Reported in : AIR1955Mad419

cognate Acts and Provisions are:1. Charitable Endowments Act, 6 of 1890, Sections 5, 6, 8 and 10. 2. Colonial Probates Act of 1892 (Sections 5 and 56 Vict. Clause 6),3. Domicile Act of 1861 (24 and 25 Vict. Clause … Ramaswami, J.1. This is a petition purporting to bo filed under Section 28, Administrator-General's Act of 1913.2. The facts are: Sri. T. Rangaswami Chettiar died at Madras on 29-6-1933. He

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2003

Sanjay Suri Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Oct-20-2003

Subject : Family

Acts : Indian Succession Act, 1925 - Sections 218, 222, 232, 276, 278 and 291; Administration of Estates Act, 1971 - Sections 8; Colonial Probate Act, 1892; Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925; Social Security Act, 1975

Reported in : AIR2004Delhi9; 107(2003)DLT626; 2003(71)DRJ446; (2004)136PLR13

done away with the requirement of furnishing the bonds, a requirement that existed under : (a) Colonial Probate Act, 1892, or (b) Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act, 1925. 18. Let us examine the legal position, as it … Manmohan Sarin, J. 1.Petitioner, Sanjay Suri filed a petition for grant of probate/ Letters of Administration under Section 278 read with Section 218 of the Indian Succession Act (in short the … probate in respect of the will of the deceased Smt.Kaushalya Devi dated 6.7.1993. The petition was instituted in May, 1998. However, the same was not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 11 1900

Venkatalutchmi Ammal Vs. Srirungapatnam Srinivasamurthy

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-11-1900

Subject : CivilFamily

Reported in : (1901)11MLJ91

else have any right whatever thereto.2. The testator died on August 24, 1892. On December 24, 1892 executors took out probate of the will in … said (page 51) the first question raised is as to the meaning of 'the cause of action'' in Section 6, Sub-section (1), of the Salford Hundred Court of Record Act, 1868. In my opinion it is now well … dismissing as against all the defendants the plaintiff's suit. The defendants were sued as the executors with the probate of the will of one Srirungapatnam Venkatavarada Aiyangar. The plaintiff is the daughter, and the 1st defendant is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 03 1916

Shiyali Rungia Chetty Vs. Calve Subraya Chettiar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Oct-03-1916

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 37Ind.Cas.404

October 1892 in the Court of first instance at Pondicherry alleging various acts of malversation and breaches of trust against 1st, 2nd and 3rd defendants … the lands lay in Pennsylvania. The Lord Chancellor observed: 'A Will of lands lying in any of the Colonies is not triable in Westminster Hall.' In Carteret v. Petty 2 Swan. 324, partition of land situate in … 2 and 3, who were also appointed executors of the Will and the codicil. All the executors obtained Probate from the Court of first instance at Pondicherry and in August 1893, four of them obtained from this … be open to any doubt. Story in his 'Conflict of Laws' in Section 586 lays down as a general proposition that 'In order, however, to … have been adopted by the widow and the 6th defendant is the natural mother and guardian ad

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1950

State of Bombay Vs. Narothamdas Jethabai and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-20-1950

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9

Reported in : AIR1951SC69; (1951)53BOMLR402; [1951]2SCR51

are cognisable - (a) by the High Court as a Court of Admiralty or Vice-Admiralty or as a Colonial Court of Admiralty, or as a Court having testamentary, intestate or matrimonial jurisdiction, or (b) by the High … support of this appeal and for maintaining the validity of the Madras City Civil Court Act (VII of 1892) Section 3A of which inserted in 1935 by way of amendment is in identical terms with Section 4 of … Federal Court, with respect to any of the matters in this List......' 6. Entries 1 and 2, List II :- '1....... the administration of justice; … here with one of such Acts, we find that in The Bombay Probation of Offenders Act, 1938 (Bombay Act No. XIX of 1938), Section 3

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 09 1987

Barthels and Luders Gmbh Vs. M.V. dominique

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-09-1987

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 8, Rule 6, 6A, 6A(2) and 6C; Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891 - Sections 2 and 35

Reported in : AIR1988Bom380; 1988MhLJ728

should not be tried together.4. This High Court was set up as a court of Admiralty under the Colonial Courts of Admiralty (India) Act, 1891. It is now laid down by a number of decisions of this … under any other provisions of law in this Court?5. In the case of The Cheapside reported in 1904 Probate Division, 339 the owners, master and crew who were all foreigners outside the jurisdiction of the English Court, … by the Court of Admiralty under the Admiralty Courts Act, 1861. Under Section 4 of the Admiralty Courts Act, 1861, the High Court of Admiralty … than in admiralty, and hence could entertain it.6. Under Order 8, Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Procedure & defendant in a suit may

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 08 1905

United States Vs. Ju Toy

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : May-08-1905

Subject : Land Acquisition

saying (p. 149 U. S. 730 ): "The proceeding before a United States judge, as provided for in section 6 of the act of 1892, is in no proper sense a trial and sentence for a crime or … is Scott v. McNeal, 154 U. S. 34 , in which it was held that a court of probate, having jurisdiction in the administration of deceased persons, had no jurisdiction to appoint an administrator of one who

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 27 1953

Khalil Ahamad Khan Vs. Malka Mehar Nigar Begum and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-27-1953

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesProperty

Acts : Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 7 and 46; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9; Muhammadan Law

Reported in : AIR1954All362

is revocable at the pleasure of the Mutwaili: vide MacNaghtan's Principles and Precedents of Mohammadan Law, Chapter X, Section 6, -- 'Sayad Abduia Edrus v. Sayad Zain Sayad Hasan Edrus', 13 Bom 555 (K).73. Bearing these principles in … during the lifetime of the executrix and also provisions which were to take effect on the executrix's death. Probate was applied for of the document as a will. It was contended that since the document contained provisions … appeals is barred under Section 46 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act (31 of 1950). Before the Act there were certain Ordinances and learned

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial