Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coinage act 2011 central section 3 · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.023 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 11 2018

Nafis Qazi & Anr. Vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-11-2018

Subject : MRTP

filed counter affidavits.4. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent no.2, our attention is drawn to the Coinage Act, 2011 which is an enactment inter alia intended to consolidate the laws relating to coinage and minting as well … coin is described in Section 2(c) as to mean putting a coin into circulation for use as money.8. Section 3 of the legislation enables the Central Government to establish a mint by notification.9. So far as the minting

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 02 2023

Vivek Narayan Sharma Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-02-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

xxxx (d) “rupee coin” means (***) rupees which are legal tender in India under the provisions of the Coinage Act, 2011 (11 of 2011)” 13 7.4 Chapter II of the Act deals with Incorporation, Capital, Management and Business. Section … emanate from the Central Board and not from the Central Government. According to the petitioners, in … the Ordinance was notified on 16th January 1978, which transformed into the Act on 30th March 1978. Under Section 3 of the 1978 Act, all high denomination bank notes, notwithstanding anything contained in Section 26 of the RBI

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2026

Sunflame Enterprises P. Ltd. vs Sumit Kishan Sharma & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Mark, which is confusingly and deceptively similar, and almost identical, to the Petitioner’s Mark. Such ingenious adoption and coinage cannot be a mere coincidence. The adoption of the Impugned Mark further shows slavish imitation of the Petitioner’s … marks as has been held in Hindustan Unilever limited v. Ashique Chemicals, 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1061. 4.5 The Petitioner has registrations over the Petitioner’s … likely to wonder about its association with the plaintiff’s. Imitation of the central idea or commercial impression of a mark, not just its visual orSignature … JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J1. The present Rectification Petition has been filed under Section 57 ofthe Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“Act”) seeking rectification of the Register of Trade Marks by cancellation / removal of the Trade Mark, … OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment delivered on: 31.01.2026+ C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 39/2024 & I.A. 5792/2024SUNFLAME ENTERPRISES P.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial