Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coinage act 2011 central section 23 · Page 1 of about 3 results (0.018 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 02 2023

Vivek Narayan Sharma Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-02-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

xxxx (d) “rupee coin” means (***) rupees which are legal tender in India under the provisions of the Coinage Act, 2011 (11 of 2011)” 13 7.4 Chapter II of the Act deals with Incorporation, Capital, Management and Business. Section … emanate from the Central Board and not from the Central Government. According to the petitioners, in … liability other than the liability of the Issue Department as defined under Section 34 of the Act, vide Section 23 of the Act. The liabilities of the Issue Department under Section 34 of the Act shall be an

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2026

Sunflame Enterprises P. Ltd. vs Sumit Kishan Sharma & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-31-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

Mark, which is confusingly and deceptively similar, and almost identical, to the Petitioner’s Mark. Such ingenious adoption and coinage cannot be a mere coincidence. The adoption of the Impugned Mark further shows slavish imitation of the Petitioner’s … marks as has been held in Hindustan Unilever limited v. Ashique Chemicals, 2011 SCC OnLine Bom 1061. 4.5 The Petitioner has registrations over the Petitioner’s … likely to wonder about its association with the plaintiff’s. Imitation of the central idea or commercial impression of a mark, not just its visual orSignature … JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAJUDGMENTTEJAS KARIA, J1. The present Rectification Petition has been filed under Section 57 ofthe Trade Marks Act, 1999 (“Act”) seeking rectification of the Register of Trade Marks by cancellation / removal of the Trade Mark,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 11 2016

International Foodstuffs Co. LLC. Vs. Parle Products Pvt. Ltd. and Ano ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-11-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

tea, rice, artificial coffee, bread, pastry and so on. The Charminar principle, if I might be permitted a coinage of my own, from Vazir Sultan must apply here. 19.Mr. Tulzapurkar then submits that as regards passing off, … mark and the label mark are both registered in Class 30. In 2011 the Defendants applied for registration for the mark LONDONDERRY . This is … 13.What Mr. Bhagat points out in saying this is actually a facet central to Mr. Tulzapurkar s case for the defence. He says that the … Parul Food Specialities Private Limited (2011 (48) PTC 235 (Del.) (DB). The last of these is particularly … the Plaintiff for its ice cream that the Plaintiff is entitled to an injunction on both causes of action, i.e., trademark infringement and passing off. 2. I disagree. My reasons follow. 3. To begin with, there is … other goods in view of the provisions of Section 47 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. 14.Every

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial