Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coinage act 1906 section 38 · Page 1 of about 5 results (0.016 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 27 1964

Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-27-1964

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Indian Coinage Act, 1906 - Sections 14(2) and 14(3); IndianCoinage (Amendment) Act, 1955

Reported in : AIR1965SC560; 1965(0)BLJR54; [1964]8SCR313; [1965]16STC93(SC)

Act and the notification issued under its provisions. The contention is based on the provisions of the Indian Coinage Act. 1906 (Act III of 1906), hereinafter called the Coinage Act. as amended by Act XXXI of 1955. It is … the real contention urged. it is neces- sary to refer to the relevant provisions of the Coinage Act. Section 13' provides the extent up to which the tender ,of the various coins would be considered legal tender. … the next coin below 37 1/2 naye paise which are equally 'below 38 naye paise and above 37 naye paise and the artificial mode of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 1969

Bhagwandas Ichharam Panchal Vs. Royal Western India Turf Club Limited

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-11-1969

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1970)72BOMLR764

the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Mr. Desai has further invited my attention to Section 13(1)(a) of the Indian Coinage Act, 1906, and to Section 26(1) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, under which payment may be made … is an instrument within the meaning of the Forgery Act, 1013, Section 7, (replacing the Forgery Act, 1861, Section 38), and so is an envelope with a postmark falsified for the purposes of a betting fraud.9. So far

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 06 1967

T.G.M. Aside and Sons Vs. Coffee Board and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jan-06-1967

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Coffee Act, 1942; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 8-B, 8B(2) and 18-A; Mysore High Court Act, 1961 - Sections 6; Indian Coinage Act, 1906 - Sections 13, 14, 14(1), 14(2) and 14(3); Mysore Existing laws (Construction of References to Values) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act

Reported in : AIR1969Kant230; AIR1969Mys230

Mysore Existing laws (Construction of References to Values) Act, 1957, and Sections 13 and 14 of the Indian Coinage Act, 1906 (Central Act 3 of 1906) Section 3 of the Mysore Existing Laws Act and Section 14 of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Nov 05 2015

Rhizome Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Represented by its ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Nov-05-2015

Subject : Intellectual Property

is a dishonest adoption with an intention to pass of its goods, there is no explanation for the coinage of IMPERIAL GOLD by the petitioner, which is evident from the imitation of the trade dress, label and … on the IPAB for more than one reason as pointed out above. 38. In the preceding paragraphs, we have held that 'IMPERIAL BLUE', and 'IMPERIAL … Appellate Board (IPAB), dated 24.12.2010, in ORA/248/08/TM/CH, an application filed by the fourth respondent under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 ( the Act ?) for removal of the petitioner's trade mark 'Rhizome's IMPERIAL GOLD' registered under No.1161682 … the order passed by the IPAB holding that the grounds embodied under Sections 9 and 11 of the Act, are available to the persons only

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 11 1911

Jyoti Prasad Singh Vs. Lachipur Coal Co.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-11-1911

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : (1911)ILR38Cal845

another of 1825 which show the rent to be Rs. 29-9, a sum which would in the present coinage amount to Rs. 31-8-6. The first receipt may not be of much value, but the second seems to … decision in Ishwar Shyam Chand Jiu v. Ram Kanai Ghose (1911) I.L.R. 38 Calc. 526, but the former ease is still binding upon us. Reliance … 287, to which reference has been made, proceeded on the special wording of Section 50 of the Tenancy Act and can have no application to a tenancy which had been divided long before that enactment. Nor is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial