Advanced Search Results

Bhagwandas Ichharam Panchal Vs. Royal Western India Turf Club Limited

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1970)72BOMLR764

the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Mr. Desai has further invited my attention to Section 13(1)(a) of the Indian Coinage Act, 1906, and to Section 26(1) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, under which payment may be made … the question of construction will not necessarily put an end to the litigation (see Lewis v. Green (1920) 36 T.L.R. 513). The procedure adopted in this case was also, it may be noticed, adopted in the recent

Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Indian Coinage Act, 1906 - Sections 14(2) and 14(3); IndianCoinage (Amendment) Act, 1955

Reported in : AIR1965SC560; 1965(0)BLJR54; [1964]8SCR313; [1965]16STC93(SC)

Act and the notification issued under its provisions. The contention is based on the provisions of the Indian Coinage Act. 1906 (Act III of 1906), hereinafter called the Coinage Act. as amended by Act XXXI of 1955. It is … the real contention urged. it is neces- sary to refer to the relevant provisions of the Coinage Act. Section 13' provides the extent up to which the tender ,of the various coins would be considered legal tender.

Mangalore Ganesh Bedi Works Vs. the State of Mysore and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Mysore Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 13, 13(1) and 13(2); Indian Coinage Act, 1906 - Sections 2, 3, 14, 14(1), 14(2), 14(3); Indian Coinage (Amendment) Act, 1955 - Sections 14, 14(1) and 14(2); Constitution of India - Articles 198, 199, 202, 207, 212, 255 and 265

Reported in : AIR1963SC589; [1963]Supp(1)SCR275; [1963]14STC198(SC)

on that basis the amount of tax would be Rs. 91,690/- but after the amendment of the Indian Coinage Act (Act 3 of 1906) by the Amending Act 31 of 1955 the rate of sales tax which was … being a Central Act dealing with 'coinage and legal tender' under item 36 of List I, could not change the rate of tax under the … and pies by value expressed in naya paisa, which was the new coinage introduced under the amended Act. Section 14 reads as under :- 'S. 14(1) The rupee shall be divided into one hundred units and the

Rhizome Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Represented by its ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property

is a dishonest adoption with an intention to pass of its goods, there is no explanation for the coinage of IMPERIAL GOLD by the petitioner, which is evident from the imitation of the trade dress, label and … describes their product as 'IMPERIAL GOLD' and not as 'Rhizome's IMPERIAL GOLD'. 36. To decide as to whether there has been infringement of the fourth … Appellate Board (IPAB), dated 24.12.2010, in ORA/248/08/TM/CH, an application filed by the fourth respondent under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 ( the Act ?) for removal of the petitioner's trade mark 'Rhizome's IMPERIAL GOLD' registered under No.1161682 … the order passed by the IPAB holding that the grounds embodied under Sections 9 and 11 of the Act, are available to the persons only

Jyoti Prasad Singh Vs. Lachipur Coal Co.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : (1911)ILR38Cal845

another of 1825 which show the rent to be Rs. 29-9, a sum which would in the present coinage amount to Rs. 31-8-6. The first receipt may not be of much value, but the second seems to … The case of Udoy Chandra Karji v. Nripendra Narayan Bhup (1909) I.L.R. 36 Calc. 287, to which reference has been made, proceeded on the special … 287, to which reference has been made, proceeded on the special wording of Section 50 of the Tenancy Act and can have no application to a tenancy which had been divided long before that enactment. Nor is