Advanced Search Results

Amrit Banaspati Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Indian Coinage Act, 1906 - Sections 14(2) and 14(3); IndianCoinage (Amendment) Act, 1955

Reported in : AIR1965SC560; 1965(0)BLJR54; [1964]8SCR313; [1965]16STC93(SC)

Act and the notification issued under its provisions. The contention is based on the provisions of the Indian Coinage Act. 1906 (Act III of 1906), hereinafter called the Coinage Act. as amended by Act XXXI of 1955. It is … the real contention urged. it is neces- sary to refer to the relevant provisions of the Coinage Act. Section 13' provides the extent up to which the tender ,of the various coins would be considered legal tender. … 65 Amount payable at 5 naya paise 6,44,661 32 Amount refundable 1,61,065 33 The appellant stood to lose by calculating the tax payable in terms

J.M. D'souza Vs. the Reserve Bank of India

Court : Mumbai

Subject : BankingCivil

Reported in : AIR1946Bom510; (1946)48BOMLR365

currency notes or bank notes on demand in exchange for coin which is legal tender under the Indian Coinage Act, 1906.' (2) The Bank shall, in exchange for currency notes or bank notes of five rupees or upwards, supply … the bank in an Issue Department which is separated and kept wholly distinct from the Banking Department. Under Section 33, Sub-section (1), the Issue Department must maintain its assets consisting of gold coin, gold bullion, sterling securities, rupee

S.P.M. Employees Union and Others. Vs. Union of India and Others.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Section 23 ; Indian Coinage Act, 1906 - Sections 6, 6(2) ;

Learned counsel has drawn our attention to the statement of object and reasons of amendment incorporated in the Coinage Act, 1906, by way of amending Act No.33 of 1985 to contend that Section 6 of the Coinage Act was

Rhizome Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Represented by its ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property

is a dishonest adoption with an intention to pass of its goods, there is no explanation for the coinage of IMPERIAL GOLD by the petitioner, which is evident from the imitation of the trade dress, label and … direct the third respondent not to cancel/re-enter trademark registration no.1161682 in class 33 for the trademark 'IMPERIAL GOLD' from/in the Register of Trademarks, and to … Appellate Board (IPAB), dated 24.12.2010, in ORA/248/08/TM/CH, an application filed by the fourth respondent under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 ( the Act ?) for removal of the petitioner's trade mark 'Rhizome's IMPERIAL GOLD' registered under No.1161682 … the order passed by the IPAB holding that the grounds embodied under Sections 9 and 11 of the Act, are available to the persons only

Shrinivasdas Lakshminarayan Vs. Ramchandra Ramrattandas

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1919)21BOMLR788

J.31. I concur, but desire to add some remarks on the general proposition.32. The Coinage Act, III of 1906, made gold coins legal tender at the rate of fifteen rupees to the sovereign. But it did not … is legal tender under any Enactment for the time being in force in British India.5. Under the Indian Coinage Act, 1900, a sovereign is legal tender for Rs. 15. The Explanation to the Notification says that for the … what the Court regards as public policy. This is laid down in Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act and in India therefore it cannot

Jyoti Prasad Singh Vs. Lachipur Coal Co.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : (1911)ILR38Cal845

another of 1825 which show the rent to be Rs. 29-9, a sum which would in the present coinage amount to Rs. 31-8-6. The first receipt may not be of much value, but the second seems to … (1905) 2 C.L.J. 20. See also Tituram Mukerjee v. Cohen (1905) I.L.R. 33 Calc. 203. The question remains whether the position of a tenant in … 287, to which reference has been made, proceeded on the special wording of Section 50 of the Tenancy Act and can have no application to a tenancy which had been divided long before that enactment. Nor is