Advanced Search Results

S.P.M. Employees Union and Others. Vs. Union of India and Others.

Court : Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur

Subject : Contract

Acts : Contract Act, 1872 - Section 23 ; Indian Coinage Act, 1906 - Sections 6, 6(2) ;

Learned counsel has drawn our attention to the statement of object and reasons of amendment incorporated in the Coinage Act, 1906, by way of amending Act No.33 of 1985 to contend that Section 6 of the Coinage Act was … to the respondent no.2, issued a strike notice on 26.9.2005. Regional Labour Commissioner (C) issued a notice on 29.9.2005 to start conciliating proceedings. Thereafter, an office memorandum dated 10th February, 2006, (annexure P/1) was issued by which

Phalwant Singh Vs. Jai Narain

Court : Delhi

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 - Sections 14(1)

Reported in : 18(1980)DLT360; 1980RLR558

legal tender, that is, in the coin of the realm as envisaged in S. 13 of the Indian Coinage Act, 1906, and in paper currency as envisaged in Ss. 22 and 26 of the Reserve Bank of India Act, … an order of eviction. An appeal to the Tribunal failed on January 29, 1980. Hence, this second appeal. (6) This appeal was filed on February … The appeal was not competent even on that day and is, thereforee, barred by time. I hold so. Section 4 of the Court Fees Act and the Custodian Evacuee Property v. Prabhu Dayal Chhajan Lal awl others,

Norman Vs. Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

be enforced after the Congress had passed the Act of June 29, 1906, 34 Stat. 584. Louisville & Nashville R. Co. v. Mottley, 219 U. … to enact that paper currency shall be equal in value to the representative of value determined by the coinage acts, and impress upon it such qualities as currency for purchases and for payment of debts as accord … enact that paper currency shall be equal in value to the representative of value determined by the coinage acts, and impress upon it such qualities as currency for purchases and for payment of debts as accord with … § 5(b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, were confirmed. That section was amended so as to provide that, during any period of national

Shrinivasdas Lakshminarayan Vs. Ramchandra Ramrattandas

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Contract

Reported in : (1919)21BOMLR788

J.31. I concur, but desire to add some remarks on the general proposition.32. The Coinage Act, III of 1906, made gold coins legal tender at the rate of fifteen rupees to the sovereign. But it did not … is legal tender under any Enactment for the time being in force in British India.5. Under the Indian Coinage Act, 1900, a sovereign is legal tender for Rs. 15. The Explanation to the Notification says that for the … what the Court regards as public policy. This is laid down in Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act and in India therefore it cannot … otherwise than as currency. The Defence of India Act Notification of the 29th June 1917 prohibited their use otherwise than as currency. The parties to

T.G.M. Aside and Sons Vs. Coffee Board and anr.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Coffee Act, 1942; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 8-B, 8B(2) and 18-A; Mysore High Court Act, 1961 - Sections 6; Indian Coinage Act, 1906 - Sections 13, 14, 14(1), 14(2) and 14(3); Mysore Existing laws (Construction of References to Values) Act, 1957 - Sections 3; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act

Reported in : AIR1969Kant230; AIR1969Mys230

Mysore Existing laws (Construction of References to Values) Act, 1957, and Sections 13 and 14 of the Indian Coinage Act, 1906 (Central Act 3 of 1906) Section 3 of the Mysore Existing Laws Act and Section 14 of the

Rhizome Distilleries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India, Represented by its ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Intellectual Property

is a dishonest adoption with an intention to pass of its goods, there is no explanation for the coinage of IMPERIAL GOLD by the petitioner, which is evident from the imitation of the trade dress, label and … applying the test of infringement, the trade mark Rhizome's IMPERIAL GOLD is in breach of Section 11(1) and Section 29 of the Act and the IPAB rightly cancelled the same. As regards the deceptive similarity by referring to

Jyoti Prasad Singh Vs. Lachipur Coal Co.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Commercial

Reported in : (1911)ILR38Cal845

another of 1825 which show the rent to be Rs. 29-9, a sum which would in the present coinage amount to Rs. 31-8-6. The first receipt may not be of much value, but the second seems to … 287, to which reference has been made, proceeded on the special wording of Section 50 of the Tenancy Act and can have no application to a tenancy which had been divided long before that enactment. Nor is