Advanced Search Results
Coffee Board Employees
Supreme Court of India
Dec-11-1991
Labour and Industrial
Coffee Act, 1942 - Sections 32(2)
JT1991(6)SC416; 1992LabIC2492; 1991(2)SCALE1307; (1992)1SCC500; [1991]Supp3SCR387; 1991(2)SLJ1307(SC); 1992(1)LC329(SC); (1992)1UPLBEC350
Act'] is legal and further whether such payment could be made from the Pool Fund constituted under the Coffee Act, 1942 [hereinafter referred to as the 'Act']. The relevant facts in brief arc as follow: 2. The appellant-coffee Board … was made out of the Pool Fund which was to be applied only for the purposes mentioned in Section 32 of the Act, the Said payment was illegal on the ground that the purposes mentioned under the said
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskConsolidated Coffee Ltd. and anr. Vs. Coffee Board, Bangalore
Supreme Court of India
Apr-15-1980
Sales Tax
Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 2 and 5(3); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 32 and 286(2); Sale of Goods Act, 1930 - Sections 3, 4(2), 20, 25(1), 62, 64, 64(2) and 64(5); Coffee Act, 1942 - Sections 5; Coffee Rules; Central Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1976
AIR1980SC1468; (1980)3SCC358; [1980]3SCR625; [1980]46STC164(SC)
identical may be stated. The Coffee Board, Bangalore is a statutory corporation incorporated Under Section 5 of the Coffee Act, 1942, an enactment passed to provide for the development of the Coffee Industry under the control of the Union. … V.D. Tulzapurkar, J. 1. These writ petitions filed by Registered Exporters of coffee under Article 32 of the Constitution raise an important question of proper construction of Section 5(3), a provision newly inserted in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.J.C. Estates and ors. Vs. the Coffee Board
Karnataka
Mar-12-2003
Sales Tax
Coffee Act, 1942; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959; Constitution of India - Article 14
[2004]138STC557(Kar)
been selling the coffee grown in their estates to the Coffee Board as per the provisions of the Coffee Act, 1942 (for short, 'the Act'). The appellants had been pooling coffee with the Coffee Board under the name Silver … pay the purchase tax is met by the Board from and out of the 'pool fund' created under section 32 of the Act.4. We have heard Sri. B.V. Acharya, learned Senior Counsel for the appellants and Sri M.V.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Consolidated Coffee Limited and anr. Vs. Coffee Board and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-22-1994
Sales Tax
Coffee Act, 1942 - Sections 4, 25(3), 25(6), 26, 30, 31, 32(2) and 34; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 5(3) and 6
JT1995(1)SC1; 1994(4)SCALE1025; (1995)1SCC312; [1994]Supp5SCR632; [1995]97STC95(SC)
any payment under the head 'Purchase Tax' out of the Pool Fund maintained under Section 30 of the Coffee Act, 1942. According to the appellants, the Board cannot discharge its liability in respect of payment of 'Purchase Tax' to … of Section 13; and(b) any sums transferred to the General Fund under the provision to Sub-Section (2) of (Section 32; and)(c) all fees levied and collected by the Board under this Act.(2) The General Fund shall be applied;
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA.C. Shive Gowda, Etc., Etc. Vs. Coffee Board and ors., Etc., Etc.
Karnataka
Aug-23-1979
Labour and Industrial
Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226; Indian Coffee Act, 1942 - Sections 2, 2(22), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(4), 14, 16 to 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 32, 32(2), 34, 37, 38, 38A, 39, 39A, 42, 46, 47 and 48; Payment of Bonus Act - Sections 32; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 8.2; Indian Coffee Market Expansion Ordinance, 1940
1980(1)KarLJ200; (1980)ILLJ123Kant
presented under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, by registered owners of coffee estates under the Indian Coffee Act, 1942 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', the following question of law arises for consideration : 'Whether the Coffee … counsel for respondent 3 Employees' Association adopted the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the Board. 5. Section 32(iv) and (v) (c) of the Bonus Act, on which the appellants rely, reads : '32. Nothing in this
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCoffee Board, Karnataka, Bangalore Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxe ...
Supreme Court of India
May-11-1988
Commercial
Coffee Act, 1942 - Sections 17, 25, 25(1), 26, 26(2), 34, 38-A and 38-B; Karnataka Sales Tax Act - Sections 6; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 6; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 7-A; Constitution of India - Articles 31, 32, 286 and 366; Central Sales Tax Act
AIR1988SC1487; (1988)2CompLJ161(SC); JT1988(2)SC448; 1988(1)SCALE1055; (1988)3SCC263; [1998]Supp1SCR348; [1988]70STC162(SC)
it may be noted that the appellant herein-Coffee Board contended that the compulsory delivery of coffee under the Coffee Act, 1942 extinguishing all marketing rights of the growers was 'compulsory acquisition' and not sale or purchase to attract levy … may be under the relevant Sales Tax Law of the country.3. The power conferred on the Board under Section 25(2) of the Coffee Act, to which we will make reference later, to reject coffee offered for delivery … as to costs.51. Civil Writ Petition No. 358 of 1986 under Article 32 of the Constitution of India is dismissed. Re. Writ Petition No. 36
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskConsolidated Coffee Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Coffee Board and anr.
Karnataka
Sep-16-1988
Sales Tax
Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1), 3, 5, 5(3), 5(5), 6, 6B, 10, 13(4), 17, 18, 18A, 29, 31(2), 32, 32(1)(2), 42 and 42(1); Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 7A
ILR1989KAR1532; 1988(2)KarLJ488; [1989]74STC272(Kar)
Tax Act, out of the pool fund which it is required to maintain, under section 30 of the Coffee Act, 1942 ?' 2. The brief facts and circumstances of the case which have given rise to the above question … of section 13; and (b) any sums transferred to the general fund under the proviso to sub-section(2) of section 32; and (c) all fees levied and collected by the Board under this Act. (2) The general fund shall
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState of Kerala and ors. Vs. Bhavani Tea Produce Co. Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-07-1965
Direct Taxation
Madras Plantations Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1955 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 17, 22, 33, 34, 54 and 65; Coffee Market Expansion Act, 1942 - Sections 14 and 25; Indian Income-tax Act; Constitution of India - Article 226
AIR1966SC677; [1966]59ITR254(SC); [1966]2SCR92
of coffee delivered by the Company to the Coffee Board under s. 25 of the Coffee Market Expansion Act, 1942, in the years 1952-53 and 1953-54, that is to say, prior to April 1, 1954, when the Madras … whether under the scheme of the Madras Plantations Agricultural Income Tax Act read with the scheme of the Coffee Act it can be said that the income was only received when the payment was received or when the … are concerned. The Madras Plantations Agricultural Income Tax Act consists of 65 sections. It is not necessary to give a full analysis of the Act.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAnil Kumar Bhandari Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Karnataka
Nov-18-1994
Commercial
Coffee Act, 1942 - Sections 20 and 22; Coffee Rules, 1955 - Rule 44
ILR1995KAR193; 1995(1)KarLJ632
and the resultant upward trend in retail prices, the first respondent in pursuance of Section 20 of the Coffee Act, 1942 (for short 'the Act'), directed the second respondent to implement the Directives mentioned in Annexure-B to arrest steep
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Dy. Commissioner and Another Vs. Gidda and Others
Karnataka
Apr-20-2012
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Karnataka (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955 ; Mysore (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955. ; Mysore Forest Regulation, 1900 - Section 35 (1)(3), 2(2), 33; Karnataka Forest Act 1963 - Section 117, 106, 6; KCRIA Act - Section 3, 9(1), 3(g), 3(b), 7, 8; Karnataka Land Grant Rules
2012ILR(Kar)2275
is contended that there is coffee cultivation, proof of such cultivation in terms of the requirements under the Coffee Act 1942 shall also be produced. Mere stray entries in revenue records shall not be acceptable. If the said requirements … it is contended that the notification dated 06.03.1928 is not valid inasmuch as the same is issued under Section 35 (iii) of the Regulations. It is further contended that the said Regulation only provides for Regulation of … prepared by the Committee dated 27.06.2001, filed in this Court refers to 327 cases of Land Grants and 606 cases of Encroachments and the action
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »