Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coffee act 1942 section 26 · Page 1 of about 67 results (0.051 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 11 1988

Coffee Board, Karnataka, Bangalore Vs. Commissioner of Commercial Taxe ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-11-1988

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Coffee Act, 1942 - Sections 17, 25, 25(1), 26, 26(2), 34, 38-A and 38-B; Karnataka Sales Tax Act - Sections 6; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 6; Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 7-A; Constitution of India - Articles 31, 32, 286 and 366; Central Sales Tax Act

Reported in : AIR1988SC1487; (1988)2CompLJ161(SC); JT1988(2)SC448; 1988(1)SCALE1055; (1988)3SCC263; [1998]Supp1SCR348; [1988]70STC162(SC)

it may be noted that the appellant herein-Coffee Board contended that the compulsory delivery of coffee under the Coffee Act, 1942 extinguishing all marketing rights of the growers was 'compulsory acquisition' and not sale or purchase to attract levy … the domestic market and for export through auctions and other channels in regulated quantities and at convenient intervals, (Section 26(1)(f) Payment to growers in such amounts and at such times as decided by the Board (Section 34). The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 03 1989

Ramesh Enterprises, Bangalore and Etc., M.S.P. Exports (P) Ltd., Banga ...

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-03-1989

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Coffee Act, 1942 - Sections 5, 19, 20 and 26; Constitution of India - Article 226; Coffee Rules, 1955

Reported in : AIR1990Kant196; ILR1989KAR3537; 1990(1)KarLJ123

business of export of coffee from India to various foreign countries. As required under the provisions of the Coffee Act, 1942 ('the Act' for short) and the Coffee Rules, 1955 ('the Rules' for short), they have registered themselves as … of the following cases, namely : (i) coffee sold by the Board in pursuance of its functions under Section 26; (ii) roasted or prepared coffee. (2) The Board shall issue orders for the export of coffee and permits

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 22 1994

Consolidated Coffee Limited and anr. Vs. Coffee Board and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-22-1994

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Coffee Act, 1942 - Sections 4, 25(3), 25(6), 26, 30, 31, 32(2) and 34; Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 5(3) and 6

Reported in : JT1995(1)SC1; 1994(4)SCALE1025; (1995)1SCC312; [1994]Supp5SCR632; [1995]97STC95(SC)

any payment under the head 'Purchase Tax' out of the Pool Fund maintained under Section 30 of the Coffee Act, 1942. According to the appellants, the Board cannot discharge its liability in respect of payment of 'Purchase Tax' to … no rights in respect of such coffee except his right to receive the payments referred to in Section 34.Section 26 says:26. (1) The Board shall take all practical measures to market the coffee included in the surplus pool,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 19 1963

The Coffee Board, Bangalore Vs. Famous Coffee and Tea Works, Coimbator ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-19-1963

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Coffee Market Expansion Act, 1942; Coffee Market Expansion (Amendment) Act, 1947 - Sections 9, 16, 26, 32-A, 34, 47, 48, 48(2) and 48A(2)(1); Constitution of India - Article 14; Coffee Market Expansion Rules, 1940 - Rules 29 to 31; Public Contracts Act

Reported in : AIR1965Mad14

in each case Rs. 350. (Junior fee in addition)(51) Appeal allowed. Commercial - damages - Coffee Market Expansion Act, 1942, Sections 9, 16, 26, 32A, 34, 47, 48, 48 (2) and 48A (2) (1) of Coffee Market Expansion … to the coffee except a right to receive payment from the Board under section 34. The next section, Section 26 is an important one. It directs the Board to take all practical measures to market the coffee included

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 23 1979

A.C. Shive Gowda, Etc., Etc. Vs. Coffee Board and ors., Etc., Etc.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Aug-23-1979

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226; Indian Coffee Act, 1942 - Sections 2, 2(22), 4, 4(1), 4(2), 5, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(4), 14, 16 to 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 31(1), 31(2), 32, 32(2), 34, 37, 38, 38A, 39, 39A, 42, 46, 47 and 48; Payment of Bonus Act - Sections 32; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 8.2; Indian Coffee Market Expansion Ordinance, 1940

Reported in : 1980(1)KarLJ200; (1980)ILLJ123Kant

presented under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, by registered owners of coffee estates under the Indian Coffee Act, 1942 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act', the following question of law arises for consideration : 'Whether the Coffee … rights in respect of such coffee except his right to receive the payments referred to in S. 34.' Section 26 empowers the Board to take all the necessary steps to market the surplus coffee delivered to it by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 29 1962

G.M. Gopalkrishna Vs. Wealth-tax Officer, Mysore

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-29-1962

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act 1957 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 5(1) and 6

Reported in : [1964]51ITR575(KAR); [1964]51ITR575(Karn)

pool fund to the registered growers are the main features of the coffee marketing scheme operated under the Coffee Act, 1942. It is obligatory on every registered grower to deliver his coffee to the coffee pool. The growers deliver … 5. In the instant case, no internal sale quotas have been allotted to the estates concerned. As per section 26, the Coffee Board is required to take all practical measures to market the coffee included in the surplus

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 28 1997

Food Corporation of India, Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-28-1997

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India; Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Essential Commodities Act, 1955- Sections 3; Food Corporation Act, 1964; Wheat (Uttar Pradesh) Price Control Order, 1959;Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 3; Uttar Pradesh Krishi Utpadan Mandi Adhiniyam, 1964; Contract Act - Sections 14; Coffee Act, 1942 - Sections 14, 25(1), 26(1), 34(2); Madras Plantations Agricultural Incoem-tax Act, 1955;

Reported in : AIR1997SC1252; JT1997(2)SC243; 1997(1)SCALE720; (1997)3SCC410; [1997]1SCR24; [1997]105STC4(SC)

were (at page 1491 of AIR):(a) Compulsory registration of all lands planted with coffee (Section 14 of the Coffee Act), (b) Mandatory delivery of all coffee grown in the registered estates except the quantities permitted by the Board … domestic market and for export through auctions and other channels in regulated quantities and at convenient intervals (Section 26(1)). (f) Payment to growers in such amounts and at such times as decided by the Board (Section 34).

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 16 1975

SerajuddIn and ors. Vs. the State of Orissa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-16-1975

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 5, 5(1) and 5(2); Constitution of India - Article 286 and 286(1); Constitution Sixth Amendment Act, 1956; West Bengal Sales Tax Act; Mysore Sales Tax Act; Bihar Sales Tax Act; Tea Act, 1953; Coffee Act, 1942; Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947; Bombay Sales Tax Act - Sections 10; Exports Control Order, 1958; General Clauses Act - Sections 13; Sale of Goods Act; Import and Export Control Act, 1947

Reported in : AIR1975SC1564; (1975)2SCC47; [1975]SuppSCR169; [1975]36STC136(SC)

with a case relating to the export of coffee. Export of coffee outside India was controlled under the Coffee Act, 1942, by the Coffee Board. Coffee especially screened and selected was sold to registered exporters at 'export auctions'. Permits … as STC). The appellants entered into two contracts No. 6/60 dated October 26, 1960 and No. 2/61 dated April 14, 1961 for sale of those … the appellant's two contracts with the Corporation are exigible to tax under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.4. Section 5(1) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 hereinafter referred to as the Act contains the following relevant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 24 1995

B.M. Shivakumar Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-24-1995

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Income Tax Act, 1961 - Sections 3, 12, 18, 19, 25, 26, 32A, 34, 35, 36, 37 and 55

Reported in : ILR1996KAR397; 1996(41)KarLJ1

the Coffee Board has to be determined and assessed keeping in view the provisions of the Coffee Board Act, 1942. This question, in my opinion, has been conclusively answered by the Supreme Court in the case of State … to partition by the petitioner by supply to the Coffee Board as contemplated under section 25 of the Coffee Act. Thus, the conclusion is irresistible that the proviso has no application to the instant case at all.' 10. … hands of transferor or transferee with reference to a particular previous year in which transfer takes place. Similarly, section 26 provides for assessment and collection of tax in case a company or firm or association of persons, though

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2012

The Dy. Commissioner and Another Vs. Gidda and Others

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Apr-20-2012

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Karnataka (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955 ; Mysore (Religious and Charitable) Inams Abolition Act, 1955. ; Mysore Forest Regulation, 1900 - Section 35 (1)(3), 2(2), 33; Karnataka Forest Act 1963 - Section 117, 106, 6; KCRIA Act - Section 3, 9(1), 3(g), 3(b), 7, 8; Karnataka Land Grant Rules

Reported in : 2012ILR(Kar)2275

is contended that there is coffee cultivation, proof of such cultivation in terms of the requirements under the Coffee Act 1942 shall also be produced. Mere stray entries in revenue records shall not be acceptable. If the said requirements … it is contended that the notification dated 06.03.1928 is not valid inasmuch as the same is issued under Section 35 (iii) of the Regulations. It is further contended that the said Regulation only provides for Regulation of … which were the subject matter in Writ Petition Nos.26882-26883/2001 connected with W.P.Nos. 26570-26575/2001, 26459/01, 26568/01, 26183/01, 24742-24743/01, 26608/01, 26494-26495/01. 27044/01, 36434-36452/01, 39542/01 be entered as

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial