Advanced Search Results
Dara Singh and anr. Vs. the State
Punjab and Haryana
Sep-11-1951
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342, 374, 401 and 423; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 302
AIR1952P& H214
was also sent for confirmation of the sentence of death under the provisions of Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.2. The story against the appellants was simple enough. In broad daylight the two appellants and their two companions … with the preliminary objection. The objection was that the provisions of Section 342, Criminal P. C., had not been complied with and that as they … Sessions Judge, Amritsar. The learned Judge found Dara Singh and Indar Singh guilty under Section 302, Indian Penal Code, and sentenced Dara Singh to death and Indar Singh to transportation for life. He found that the case … personal inspection by the Court is necessary, the provisions of the two sections come into operation.9. The Supreme Court in its judgment never dealt with
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.B. Kanwar, Editor, Printer and Publisher of 'Rana Partap', Ambala Vs ...
Punjab and Haryana
Aug-08-1962
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 198(3) and 342; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 19(2)
AIR1963P& H201; 1963CriLJ609
accused was given by the Punjab Government.3. In his statement under Section 342, Code of Criminal Procedure, the accused denied being the Editor, Printer and … appellant was prosecuted on a complaint filed by the Public Prosecutor on 7-5-1960 under Section 198-B of the Code of Criminal Procedure. According to the allegations against the accused, he was the Editor, Printer and Publisher of newspaper entitled 'Rana, … the judgment of learned Sessions judge, Ambala, whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 500, Indian Penal Code, and has been sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a … I set aside the order with regard to payment of fine. - Sections 100-A [As inserted by Act 22 of 2002], 110 & 104 &
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMunni Begum Vs. State
Delhi
Apr-15-1968
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 205, 205(2), 342, 540A and 540A(1)
AIR1968Delhi202; 1968CriLJ1162; 5(1969)DLT194
the petitioner to appear in person for making a statement under Section 342, Criminal Procedure Code. (2) Dissatisfied with the order made by the learned … petitioner. Before she appeared in Court an application was moved on her behalf under Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure through her advocate Mr. Sultan :Yar Khan wherein it was stated that she was a pardahnashin lady and … petitioner. Before she appeared in Court an application was moved on her behalf under Section 205 of the Code of Criminal Procedure through her advocate Mr. Sultan :Yar Khan wherein it was stated that she was a … hearing the judgment. There is no express provision in any of the sections dealing with trial of summons cases indicating that personal appearance of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Banwarilal and anr. Vs. the State
Allahabad
Nov-25-1955
Criminal
Constitution of India - Article 20 and 20(3); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342 and 342(3); Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 3; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34 and 415
AIR1956All341; 1956CriLJ664
which may be taken into consideration by the Court, so well known to the Evidence Act and the Code of Criminal Procedure, has been ignored by the learned commentator. Moreover the basis of the learned commentator's view that the provisions … shall be compelled to be a witness against himself'.The gist of the provisions of Section 342 of the Code is that for the purpose of enabling the accused, to explain any circumstances appearing in the evidence against … Magistrate to stand their trial in the Sessions Court on charges of Sections 420 and 379, I. P. C each charge being in respect of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSamresh Singh Vs. the State
Allahabad
Sep-24-1951
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342 and 367 ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 101 and 103
AIR1953All781
The accused is on bail. He need not surrender. Criminal - embezzlement -Sections 94 , 342 and 367 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 along with Sections 101,102 and 103 of Evidence Act, 1872 - Criminal Procedure Code,1898 does not … 1.This is a revision on behalf of one Samresh Singh, who has been convicted under Section 408, Penal Code, by the learned Additional Sessions Judge of Bahraich and sentenced to three months' rigorous imprisonment and a fine
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevi Ram Vs. State
Delhi
Jan-11-1968
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342
1970CriLJ536; 4(1968)DLT363
prose.:ution case was nto put to the accased in detail in his examination under section 342 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and that the petitioner was considerably prejudiced thereby.(13) The receipt (Ex. P/S). which is alleged to have … Judge, Mabasu. On a report by the learned Sessions Judge, Mabasu, a case under section 409, Indian Penal Code, was registered against the bailift, Devi Ram, the petitioner herein. (7) The prosecution examined 13 witnesses in support … On a report by the learned Sessions Judge, Mabasu, a case under section 409, Indian Penal Code, was registered against the bailift, Devi Ram, the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShreelal Kajaria Vs. the State
Mumbai
Jul-08-1963
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342, 537 and 540
AIR1964Bom165; (1963)65BOMLR772; 1964CriLJ15; ILR1963Bom698
defence, also led evidence; and it appears that the examination of the accused under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, had also been exhaustively done, it was practically after the entire case was over, that an application was … which he directed certain witnesses to be examined as Court witnesses under Section 540 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner is the accused before the learned Additional Sessions Judge. The allegation of the prosecution is that … which he directed certain witnesses to be examined as Court witnesses under Section 540 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner is the accused before
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskState Vs. Abdul Gafur Miya Mahamad and anr.
Mumbai
Nov-21-1951
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 256, 292 and 342
AIR1952Bom333; (1952)54BOMLR322; ILR1953Bom969
defence. Thereafter when the stage arrived for the accused persons to make statements under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, accused No. 1 stated that he wished to use, as a part of his own statement, the statements … defence. Thereafter when the stage arrived for the accused persons to make statements under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, accused No. 1 stated that he wished to use, as a part of his own … material tothe report.)(4) Order accordingly. Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Sections 256, 342, 292 (c) - Statements made by prosecution witnesses before committing
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit Kumar Chowdhry Vs. the State of Bihar
Supreme Court of India
Jul-28-1972
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 342; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 379 and 411
AIR1972SC2058; 1972CriLJ1315; (1972)2SCC451
411 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 3 of Railway Stores (Unlawful Possession) Act, 195 and Section 342 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Appellant charged for offence of stealing a mirror of railway - He was charged for … this Court the only objection raised on behalf of the appellant, is that the provisions of Section 342. CrPC have not been fully complied with.6. The trial court put the following two questions to the accused under … 'IR' was recovered. On these facts the police registered a case under Sections 379/411, Indian Penal Code. But in the trial court the charges were
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDharam Vir Vs. State
Delhi
Oct-15-1971
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 97 and 99; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 342
ILR1972Delhi372
a simple sharp linear cut 1/2' obliquely placed on the little right finger.(4) When examined under section 342 Criminal Procedure Code ., the appellant denied that the incident took place in the manner alleged by the prosecution witnesses. … Ram girl were tried before the Additional Session Judge. Delhi for an offence under section 302/34 Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of one Rajinder on 1-10-1971. The prosecution case against these persons was that one … were tried before the Additional Session Judge. Delhi for an offence under section 302/34 Indian Penal Code for the alleged murder of one Rajinder on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »