Advanced Search Results
Mohammad Usman Mohammad HussaIn Maniyar and ors. Vs. State of Maharash ...
Supreme Court of India
Mar-03-1981
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 342; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5; Explosive Substances Act, 1908 - Sections 5
AIR1981SC1062; 1981CriLJ588; 1981(1)SCALE445; (1981)2SCC443; 1981(Supp)SCC17; [1981]3SCR68
of Explosive Substances Act, 1908, Sections 120, 120A and 120B of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 342 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - to prove offence under Section 5 prosecution has to prove - firstly substance in question … also to the above effect.7. The appellants pleaded not guilty. In his statement under Section 342 of the CrPC, appellant, Fakhruddin, additionally stated that he alone managed the shop M/s. M.F. Maniyar & Sons from which the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmperor Vs. Janardan Kashinath Abhyankar
Mumbai
Jan-13-1931
Criminal
(1931)33BOMLR340
Magistrate hoard evidence and merely recorded the plea of guilty, one has to consider the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. This being a summons case the relevant provisions are contained in Section 242 and the following sections. … evidence and merely recorded the plea of guilty, one has to consider the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code. This being a summons case the relevant provisions are contained in Section 242 and the following sections. Section … convicted under Section 17(1) of the Criminal Law Amendment Act XIV of 1908 and sentenced to four months' rigorous imprisonment. The facts of the case … the Magistrate does not appear to have examined the accused under Section 342 which, I think, he ought to have done after hearing evidence. Our
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCoal Mines Officers Association of India and Others Vs. Union of India ...
Kolkata
Mar-21-1995
ConstitutionCriminal
Mines Act, 1952 - Sections 4-5, 6, 8, 8B, 8C, 23, 23(1), 24 and 24(1) and (2) - Schedule - Article 24;; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 20 and 20(2) and (3);; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 120B, 179 and 304;; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 16, Rule 10;; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Section 3(38);; Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 145;; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 94, 342-A and 401 - Schedule - Articles 136, 161 and 226;; Sea Customs Act, 1878 - Sections 111 and 112;; Foreign Exchange Regulation Act;; Public Servants (Inquiries) Act, 1850;; Mines Rules, 1952 - Rule 5(4)
AIR1996Cal28,100CWN197
put to the appellant by the police officers in exercise of their jurisdiction under Article 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Supreme Court observed :--'Not all relevant answers are criminatory; not all criminatory answers are confessions. Tendency to … the powers of a Civil Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (5 of 1908), for the purpose of enforcing the attendance of witnesses … statement even in a criminal trial under Section 342-A of the Criminal Procedure Code. He, therefore, cannot … bias. The learned Counsel pointed out that the criminal case being under Sections 304 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code is not the subject … petitioners Nos. 3 to 5 purportedto be under Section 304 read with Sec-tion 120B of the Indian Penal Code. In that case, the petitioners Nos. 3 to 5 have obtained orders of anticipatory bail from this Court.6.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Emperor Vs. Vishram Narayan Devli
Mumbai
Mar-11-1930
Criminal
(1930)32BOMLR596
to vitiate the trial.16. I agree that the rule should be discharged. Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1908), Sections 256, 342 637 - Accused asked forthwith after framing of the charge to cross-examine witnesses for prosecution-No reasons … cross-examined; the accused (that is, the petitioner) was examined by the Court at some length under Section 342, Criminal Procedure Code; then the charge was framed; the accused was asked if he wished to cross-examine the prosecution witnesses … for offences under Sections 447, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code was filed on October 19, 1928, and was heard and decided on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSankaran Moitra Vs. Sadhna Das and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-24-2006
Criminal
Explosive Substance Act, 1908 - Sections 3 and 5; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 270 and 270(2); Bombay Police Act - Sections 147 and 148; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 109, 114, 120B, 148, 149, 201, 220, 302, 304, 336, 342 and 506II; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 61, 62, 173, 196, 197, 197(1), 197(3), 210, 438 and 482; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 136
AIR2006SC1599; (2006)3GLR2304; JT2006(4)SC34; 2006(3)SCALE414; (2006)4SCC584; [2006] 3 SCR 305
30.6.2001, accused No. 1, the then Assistant Commissioner of Police, moved an application under Section 210 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Therein, after referring to the complaint filed by the complainant, he submitted that on the self same matter … harassed in criminal proceedings and prosecution, that is the rationale behind Section 196 and Section 197 of the CrPC. But it is equally important to emphasise that rights of the citizens should be protected and no excesses … thereof. Cognizance had been taken of an offence under Sections 220 and 342 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 147 and 148 of the … 336 IPC read with Sections 3 & 5 of Explosive Substances Act, 1908 against the deceased and others and investigation started. The appellant, along with
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRajendra Narayan Singh Vs. Emperor
Kolkata
Sep-12-1912
Land Acquisition
18Ind.Cas.149
Carnduff, J.1. Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1898 provides that, whenever a Sub-Divisional Magistrate receives information that a person within the local limits of … Carnduff, J.1. Section 110 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1898 provides that, whenever a Sub-Divisional Magistrate receives … 'without any basis whatever' and dropped (or rather never actually taken) in 1908, and that the present Police report does not allege that anything has … second case is dated the 26th of July 1905, in which he was sent up and tried under Sections 342, 347 and 341, but was let off with a warning. The third case is one under Section 342,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Shankar Singh and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal
Supreme Court of India
Oct-10-1961
Criminal
Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 148, 149, 302 and 326; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 157, 342, 418(1), 423 and 423(2)
AIR1962SC1239; [1962]Supp1SCR49
in the manner specified in Section 423 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1908 and for that purpose it might appraise the evidence to decide what … jury and to confirm the sentence of death after modifying the order of conviction. Section 423 of the Code of Criminal Procedure invests the High Court hearing on appeal against an order of conviction or acquittal passed by a Subordinate … and thereby committing offences punishable under Sections 148, 302 and 302 read with 149 of the Indian Penal Code. The jury brought a unanimous verdict of guilty against appellants Ram Shankar Singh, Bimala and Sudama Singh for … upon the manner in which the examination of the accused under s. 342 by the Court of Session was conducted and submitted that the Sessions
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskShakeel & Ors vs State Nct of Delhi
Delhi
Jan-21-2026
Criminal
113/2018 & connected matters Page 2 of 321. This appeal under Section 374 read with Section 482 ofthe Code of Criminal Procedure, 1908 (the Cr.PC), has been filed by the five accused persons in SC No. 114/2015 on the file … Delhi, assailing thejudgment dated 11.12.2017 as per which they have been convictedand sentenced for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 365, 376 (f) & (g) and 506 (ii) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the IPC).2. The prosecution … circumstances and maintained their innocence.7. After questioning the accused under Section 313 CrPC,compliance of Section 232 CrPC was mandatory. In the case on hand, no
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRahman vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi
Delhi
Jan-21-2026
Criminal
113/2018 & connected matters Page 2 of 321. This appeal under Section 374 read with Section 482 ofthe Code of Criminal Procedure, 1908 (the Cr.PC), has been filed by the five accused persons in SC No. 114/2015 on the file … Delhi, assailing thejudgment dated 11.12.2017 as per which they have been convictedand sentenced for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 365, 376 (f) & (g) and 506 (ii) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the IPC).2. The prosecution … circumstances and maintained their innocence.7. After questioning the accused under Section 313 CrPC,compliance of Section 232 CrPC was mandatory. In the case on hand, no
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNeeraj @ Nemraj vs State
Delhi
Jan-21-2026
Criminal
113/2018 & connected matters Page 2 of 321. This appeal under Section 374 read with Section 482 ofthe Code of Criminal Procedure, 1908 (the Cr.PC), has been filed by the five accused persons in SC No. 114/2015 on the file … Delhi, assailing thejudgment dated 11.12.2017 as per which they have been convictedand sentenced for the offences punishable under Sections 342, 365, 376 (f) & (g) and 506 (ii) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (the IPC).2. The prosecution … circumstances and maintained their innocence.7. After questioning the accused under Section 313 CrPC,compliance of Section 232 CrPC was mandatory. In the case on hand, no
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »