Advanced Search Results

The State of Bihar Vs. Ram Naresh Pandey

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 4, 61, 202, 209(1), 209(2), 253(1), 253(2), 333, 417, 435, 436, 439 and 494; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 109 and 302

Reported in : AIR1957SC389; 1957(0)BLJR406; 1957CriLJ567; [1957]1SCR279

prosecutor with the consent of the Court could lie within the committal stage under Section 594 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 - It was held that such application would not lie within the purview of Section 594 of the … was reasonably satisfied, otherwise, that the evidence, if actually taken, is not likely to result in conviction. 4. Section 494 of the Code of Criminal Procedure runs as follows : 'Any Public Prosecutor may, with the consent of

State of Karnataka Vs. K.H. Annegowda and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1973 - Sections 173, 207-A, 207-A(7), 226, 228, 271, 300 and 484; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34 and 302; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1898 - Sections 494

Reported in : AIR1977SC357; 1977CriLJ220; 1977(1)KarLJ79; (1977)1SCC417; [1977]2SCR350

tried again for the same offence and dismiss the appeal. Criminal - withdrawal of case - Section 494 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - prosecution against accused committed for trial allowed to be withdrawn by Court under Section 494 … raises a short but interesting question of law relating to the interpretation of certain provisions of the CrPC, 1898 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Old Code'). The facts giving rise to the appeal are few and may

Rajender Kumar JaIn and ors. Vs. State Through Special Police Establis ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 196(1), 209, 306(4), 321, 361, 397 and 494; Constitution of India - Article 136; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B and 121A; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 494

Reported in : AIR1980SC1510; 1980CriLJ1084; (1980)3SCC435; [1980]3SCR982

as a Minister-in the Central Cabinet.7. Section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code of 1973 which corresponds to Section 494 of the CrPC of 1898 is as follows :Withdrawal from prosecution.321. The Public Prosecutor or Assistant Public Prosecutor … stage, on March 26, 1977, N.S. Mathur, Special Public Prosecutor filed ah application Under Section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code 1973, for permission to withdraw from the prosecution-The application was as follows :It is submitted on behalf

Emperor Vs. Manju Hanumant Naik

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : (1948)50BOMLR379

but also the offence constituted under Section 5. Section 8 provides:Notwithstanding anything contained in section 199 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, no Court other than that of a Presidency Magistrate or a Magistrate of the First Class shall take … 1 was charged under Section 3 of the Bombay Prevention of Hindu Bigamous Marriages Act, 1946, read with Section 494 of the Indian Penal Code, and accused No. 2 under Section 6 of the same Act.2. The prosecution

The Dist. Mag. Vs. K. Subbanna

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 439, 494, 537 and 555; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 366

Reported in : AIR1951Mad900; (1951)1MLJ570

such a charge against the accused. Criminal - protection of wards - Sections 439, 494, 537 and 555 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 and Section 366 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - principle of Section 366 is to uphold

Janardhan Chaitu Khapre Vs. Guna Balkrishna and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 198; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 494

Reported in : AIR1962Bom33; (1961)63BOMLR717; ILR1961Bom989

from filing a proper complaint with due compliance of law.(11) Revision dismissed. Criminal Procedure Code (Act V of 1898), Section 198 - Indian Penal Code (Act XLV of 1860), Section 494 -- Complaint under Section 198 by person … the complaint was filed without obtaining the leave of the Court as required by proviso to section 198, Criminal Procedure Code. This preliminary objection taken on behalf of the appellants was accepted and the learned Additional Sessions Judge

Sabbarapu Venkanna Vs. Pothula Simhachalam and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 198; Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act, 1949 - Sections 4(1) and 4(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 494

Reported in : AIR1955AP227; 1955CriLJ1316

passed. With this modification, the criminal revision case is dismissed.(17) Order accordingly. Criminal - acquittal - Section 198 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Sections 4 (1) and 4 (2) of Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act and Section … Procedure Code, 1898, Sections 4 (1) and 4 (2) of Madras Hindu (Bigamy Prevention and Divorce) Act and Section 494 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 - acquittal of respondent by Sub-Divisional Magistrate on ground of incompetent complaint as

Variath Rappai and ors. Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 494

Reported in : AIR1963Ker346; 1963CriLJ627

1962 and dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible. Criminal - splitting of case - Section 494 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 - petition filed challenging Order by which petitioner's case was split into three separate cases -

Pindi Dass Vs. State and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 494

Reported in : 9(1973)DLT216

for withdrawal of permission under Section 494 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1898 - It was held that the public prosecutor could not seek the … is in consequence of the jurisdiction exercised by the Addl Sessions Judge, Delhi under section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code, hereafter called 'the Code'. After receiving the recommendation contained in the order dated 4th of August 1972 … an application which did not mention any provision of law, but had been preferred within the purview of section 494 of the Code, which is :- 'S. 494. Any Public Prosecutor may, with the consent of the Court,

State of Punjab Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 494

Reported in : AIR1987SC188; 1987(35)BLJR171; 1987CriLJ151; 1986(0)KLT1297(SC); 1986(2)SCALE718; (1986)4SCC335; 1986(2)LC693(SC)

and destruction, should be withdrawn. In accordance therewith, the Public Prosecutors moved applications under Section 494 of the Code for permission to withdraw from the prosecutions. In due course, the applications were allowed on the learned Magistrates … Public Prosecutor to withdraw from the prosecution under Section 494 of the CrPC, 1898 to satisfy itself that the executive function of the Public Prosecutor … Public Prosecutor to withdraw from the prosecution under Section 494 of the CrPC, 1898 to satisfy itself that the executive function of the Public Prosecutor … the duty of the Court while granting permission to the Public Prosecutor to withdraw from the prosecution under Section 494 of the CrPC, 1898 to satisfy itself that the executive function of the Public Prosecutor has not been