Advanced Search Results

Jayappa Lokappa Narsinganawar Vs. Shivangouda Dyamangouda Patil

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : AIR1928Bom42; (1928)30BOMLR19

the bond executed by him was in the form laid down in Appendix G, No. 2, of the Code of Civil Procedure. Under it he makes himself liable to the extent of Rs. 4,000. On March 10, 1921, the Court … immoveable property'. It is, therefore, within the scope of Section 17, Sub-section (1), of the Indian Registration Act, 1908. It may be noted that for the present purpose there is no difference between the terms of this

Pannaji Devichand Vs. Basappa Virappa Bellary

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1943Bom243; (1943)45BOMLR510

viz., Appeal (Stamp) No. 1168 of 1929. It may be observed here that form No. 3 given in Appendix G to the Civil Procedure Code relating to the surety bond to be given under Order XLI, Rule 6, … plaintiff was willing to furnish security, and it was therefore directed under Order XLI, Rule 6, of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908, that the plaintiff might be allowed to execute the decree on furnishing security to the satisfaction

Santhimadom Builders and Developers Trust vs Prasanth C Menon

Court : Kerala

publication made does not contain the requisite particulars of a summons as envisaged in the prescribed format in Appendix B Process No.2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. As far as the present case is concerned, … the Sub Court, Chavakkad has preferred this appeal under Section 104 read withOrder XLIII Rule 1(d) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.2. In the above suit, the Sub Court, Chavakkad passed anex parte money decree against the petitioners on 28.11.2015. … AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANIL K. NARENDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G. GIRISH MONDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH 2024 / 21ST PHALGUNA, 1945

R.M. Palat Vs. P.A. Nedungadi

Court : Kerala

Subject : Civil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Order 41, Rule 5 - Order 48, Rule 3; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 4 and 59; Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 17 and 49

Reported in : AIR1958Ker377

below.6. The security bond filed by the petitioner is not in accordance with the form given in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 -- Form No. 3 of Appendix G -- an essential difference being the omission in the bond of

Union of India Vs. Jagtar Singh

Court : Delhi

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 41, Rule 12; Punjab High Court Rules - Rule 8; Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 5

Reported in : ILR1979Delhi327

11 of O. 41 of the Code. He has also drawn my attention to Form No. 6 of Appendix 'G' of the First Schedule to the Code of Civil Procedure where a model form of notice to respondent … appeal the Union of India also moved an application (C.M. 208 of 1976) under O. 41 rule 5, Code of Civil Procedure praying for an order of stay of payment of the enhanced compensation to the owner. Of this application

(1) Cwp No.17928 of 2013 (Oandm) Vs. Chandigarh Administration and Oth ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Education

is barred by the principle of constructive res judicata in view of Order 2 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as the “CPC”.). Respondent no.8 is at 52th rank in the NEET and the only … chart, which is reproduced as under:- Respdt. Serial No.in Deficiencies No.the Revised Provisional Merit List Certificate given at Appendixes 3 11 A, B and C Certificate given at Appendixes 4 13 A, B and C Certificate given … Rakesh Kumar Jain Present: Mr. Chetan Mittal, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Puneet Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner(s) in CWP Nos.17928, 18028 & 18668 of 2013.

Ram Narain-kishun Dayal Vs. Ram Prasad and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1931All65

case there was a security bond which had been drawn up in the year 1902 previous to the Civil Procedure Code of 1908. As their Lordships remarked at that period there was no definite form in which security … was null and void. Further at p. 168 (of 42 All.) their Lordships remarked that the form in appendix 'G' No. 3, present Civil P.C. of 1908 should obviate the difficulty arising in future, although it was not

Rajaneesh Kumar R, vs Travancore Devaswom Board,

Court : Kerala

respondent as a public Temple, the remedy that can be availed is only under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. In this regard, the learned counsel placed reliance on the decisions in Subramonia Pillai Chellam Pillai v. Subramonia … our perusal Volume I, Part II of Travancore Devaswom Board Manual printed and published in the year 1936. Appendix XIX to the Manual contains the list of grant-in-aid Devaswoms. Sl.No.381 in Appendix XIX is the 4 th … P.O., PALLIPPAD, KARTHIKAPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA - 690 512. 11** AJITH KUMAR, S/O. GOPINATHAN NAIR, AGED 56, MANIMANDIRAM, THEKKEKKARAKIZHAKE, PALLIPPAD P.O., KARTHIKAPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA - 690

Mt. Khairunnissa Bibi Vs. Oudh Commercial Bank

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Civil

Reported in : AIR1933All269

pointed out that in the case of securities given in accordance with the forms to be found in appendix (g) Nos. 2 and 3, Civil P.C., 1908, no difficulty like the one that arose in the case before … 'to the extent to which he has rendered himself liable' the word 'personally' was added by the present code of Civil Procedure, but by the addition of that word it could hardly have been intended to limit the enforcement of

Raj Raghubar Singh Vs. Thakur Jai Indra Bahadur Singh

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Reported in : (1920)22BOMLR521

XIV of 1882), Section 546-Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 90.;Sections 47 and 144 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, provide for the decision of questions relating to the execution, discharge or satisfaction of a decree, and for … of 1908, provides a special form of security bond to be given during the pendency of an appeal (Appendix 'G,' No. 3). The form shows that it is intended to be given to someone and -not to be