Advanced Search Results

Karnataka Fisheries Development Vs. The Deputy Secretary

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

lessor’ is unacceptable. No lease of the property belonging to the BDA can be made without following the procedure prescribed under the BDA Act and the Rules.14. The provisions of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 or the … CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED1502.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.3639/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, AT BENGALURU, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION. RFA NO.458/2016 IS FILED UNDER S.96 R/W

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, vs Sri.Chandrappa S/O. Erappa Ka ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS M.F.A. CROB IN M.F.A. NO.101591/2020 IS FILED UNDERORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARDDATED 19.02.2020 PASSED IN LAC NO.4/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR. … LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.02.2020 PASSED IN LAC NO. 18/2017 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN.), KOPPAL & ETC. IN M.F.A. NO. 101561/2020: KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, 1ST, 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR, … M.F.A. CROB IN M.F.A. NO.101591/2020 IS FILED UNDERORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARDDATED 19.02.2020 PASSED IN LAC NO.4/2017 ON THE

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, vs Smt.Yallawwa W/O. Hanmanthapp ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS M.F.A. CROB IN M.F.A. NO.101591/2020 IS FILED UNDERORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARDDATED 19.02.2020 PASSED IN LAC NO.4/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR. … LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.02.2020 PASSED IN LAC NO. 18/2017 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN.), KOPPAL & ETC. IN M.F.A. NO. 101561/2020: KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, 1ST, 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR, … M.F.A. CROB IN M.F.A. NO.101591/2020 IS FILED UNDERORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARDDATED 19.02.2020 PASSED IN LAC NO.4/2017 ON THE

The Special Land Acquisition Officer, vs Sri.Gavisiddappa S/O. Hanuman ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS M.F.A. CROB IN M.F.A. NO.101591/2020 IS FILED UNDERORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARDDATED 19.02.2020 PASSED IN LAC NO.4/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR. … LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.02.2020 PASSED IN LAC NO. 18/2017 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN.), KOPPAL & ETC. IN M.F.A. NO. 101561/2020: KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, 1ST, 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR, … M.F.A. CROB IN M.F.A. NO.101591/2020 IS FILED UNDERORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARDDATED 19.02.2020 PASSED IN LAC NO.4/2017 ON THE

Smt. Hampawwa W/O Kalakappa Gejji vs the Special Land Acquisition Offi ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

Subject : Land Acquisition

ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2) THIS M.F.A. CROB IN M.F.A. NO.101591/2020 IS FILED UNDERORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARDDATED 19.02.2020 PASSED IN LAC NO.4/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR. … LAND ACQUISITION ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 19.02.2020 PASSED IN LAC NO. 18/2017 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN.), KOPPAL & ETC. IN M.F.A. NO. 101561/2020: KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD, 1ST, 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR, … M.F.A. CROB IN M.F.A. NO.101591/2020 IS FILED UNDERORDER 41 RULE 22 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARDDATED 19.02.2020 PASSED IN LAC NO.4/2017 ON THE

Sm. Indira Debi and anr. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Law; ;West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1954 - Sections 44(2), 53, 57 and 57A

Reported in : AIR1967Cal469

petition. The grounds on which the validity of the notice have been challenged are;(1) Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure cannot be invoked for correction or revision of a finally published record of rights. (2) The respondent No. … was 124 and in the notice it was specified that the case was under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.4. This notice is dated March 27, 1963. The particulars of the case as set out at the top

Shree Vinayaka Dev Idagunji and ors. Vs. Shivaram and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Trusts and SocietiesCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 9, 115 and 151 - Order 14, Rule 2; Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950 - Sections 50 and 51

Reported in : ILR2004KAR2125; 2004(2)KarLJ460

this case.22. In the case of Ugam Singh, supra, while considering the scope of Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, at the end of para 16, the Court observed thus:'It is clear therefore that a right to worship … considering Section 73 of the Orissa Hindu Religious Endowments Act (2 of 1952) and Section 9 of the Code of Civil Procedure, at para 7, the Court observed as under:'A suit by a shebayat against the villagers who prevented him

Kalavati Bharsingh Thapa Vs. Maharashtra Plastic Industries

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1972 - Sections 30(2); Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 39

Reported in : 2004(6)BomCR600; 2005(1)MhLj631

contemplated under the said proviso is in the nature of the review provided under Order XXXIX of the Code of Civil Procedure in relation to the ex parte temporary injunction orders or interim orders passed thereunder. Sub- section (2) of … have the same powers as are vested in a Civil Court and, therefore, the powers available under the Code of Civil Procedure for the purpose of review of the judgment will also be available to such Courts. Sub-section (3) of

National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences Vs. C. Paramesh ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 10 and 151

Reported in : AIR2005SC242; 2005(2)ALD49(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)322; 2005(2)AWC1865(SC); 2005(1)CTC156; [2009(104)FLR369]; [2005(2)JCR93(SC)]; 2005(1)KarLJ486; (2005)ILLJ566SC; 2005(2)MhLj

In the facts and circumstances of the case, there will be no order as to costs. Service - Civil Procedure Code (CPC) - Sections 10 and 151 - Civil Procedure Code - Section 10 - Applicability of -

Rahematulla Haji Abdul Latif Vs. Yuvraj and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

filed the application Exhibit-19 in the Election Petition under the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11(a) of the Code of Civil Procedure, praying for dismissal of the plaint and in the alternative, it is prayed to frame preliminary issue and … the Election Petition can be dismissed in view of the provisions of Order 7 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Court can exercise the powers under the said provisions and dismiss the Election Petition on the ground