Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coconut development board act 1979 section 20 · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.070 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 15 2012

P.O. Baby Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary to the Gove ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Oct-15-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

DPC for the post of Statistical Assistant (Group-C) will be that of Group-B post. Section 20 of the Coconut Development Board Act, 1979 read with Regulation 18 of the Coconut Development Board Regulations, 1982, empowers the Coconut Development Board to amend

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 02 1983

Chirukandan and ors. Vs. Superintendent, Central Excise and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-02-1983

Subject : Excise

Acts : Copra Cess Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3 and 3(1); (The Indian) Coconut Committee Act, 1944 - Sections 3; Produce Cess Act, 1966; Government of India Act, 1935; Sea Customs Act - Sections 20(2); Coconut Development Board Act, 1979 - Sections 4; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 13, 14 to 17 and 19; Produce Cess Act, 1966 - Sections 15; Constitution of India - Articles 143(1), 189(1), 285, 289 and 289(1)

Reported in : 1984(15)ELT7(Ker)

the Central Government, after making certain deductions, to the Coconut Development Board established under Section 4 of the Coconut Development Board Act, 1979. It is the responsibility of an occupier of a mill to supply certain particulars and monthly returns to … for consideration of the Supreme Court (by a Bench consisting of 9 judges) In Re. Sea Customs Act, Section 20(2) (AIR 1963 SC 1760) on a reference made to it by the President of India under Article 143(1)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1995

Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-05-1995

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1996(53)ECC41; 1995(80)ELT737(Mad)

entry. According to the learned counsel, the object of this levy is for the purpose of benefiting the Coconut Development Board Act, 1979 (Central Act 5 of 1979) and therefore, the levy under the Act insofar as it does not benefit … to the levy and collection of duty payable to the Central Government under the provisions of the Act. Section 20 of the Act omitted the word 'copra' from the Produce Cess Act, 1966, so that the excise duty

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 12 2006

Tirumala Educational Trust Represented by Its President and Correspond ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-12-2006

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Societies Registration Act, 1860; Andhra Pradesh Grama Panchayat Act; Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 - Sections 83(2), 95 to 131, 153, 155 and 180; Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1951 - Sections 29, 29(1), 58, 63 to 69, 80 to 85, 99, 100, 100(1), 100(2) and 105; Madras Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Rules - Rules 1 to 8, 9, 9(1), 9(2) and 9(3); Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1966 - Sections 70 to 74, 74(1), 85(2), 107, 109 and 109(2); Andhra Pradesh Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1976; Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Act, 1932; Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Act, 1979 - Sections 2(27), 4, 4(1), 5, 6(2), 7, 46(1) and

Reported in : 2007(2)ALD188

and no lease of rights pertaining to any immovable property such as rights of usufruct, fishery, collection of coconut pieces, human hair etc. shall be granted for a period exceeding one year except with the prior approval … for further extension of lease for further periods of 6 years. The Board of Trustees of defendant Devasthanam passed a resolution to that effect on … Rules, 1982 came into force a separate enactment has been made, which was called the Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams Act, 1979 (for short 'the TTD Act, 1979'). For the first time the Commissioner became the Ex-officio Member of the … prior to 1981. It is further stated that the institution has been developed by constructing huge buildings with all necessary required equipment for the purpose … of Tirumala Hills and the trust commenced kindergarten section of the school in the name of Sri … Devasthanam passed a resolution to that effect on 20.07.1971. Accordingly, the defendant Devasthanam obtained necessary permission of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 01 2013

M/S. K.V.Jacob and Sons Vs. the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-01-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Circular of the State Government herein, whereby the State directed that for distribution of pumpsets under Comprehensive Coconut Development Programme and other similar schemes of the Agriculture Department, two co-operative institutions will arrange supplies in various districts. … & T DTD. 13/08/1987. EXT.R4.E: TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE 161ST MEETING DT. 29/12/2010 OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE KSCC. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C).Nos. 14314/2012, 14748/2012 … in the matter of awarding contracts and other factors, the State cannot act on its will in favour of any tenderer. Shri K.Ramakumar further emphasised … in the light of the provisions of the Telegraph Act, 1885, viz. Section 4(1) and first proviso. The discretion of the Central Government to grant … T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JANUARY 2013 11TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 14314 of 2012 (L)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2005

N. Mahadeva Naidu and anr. Vs. P. Rasool Bee (Died) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-25-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 41; Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 - Sections 34(2); Land Ceiling Act

Reported in : 2005(5)ALD614

and constructed a well and fixed up an oil engine and pump set and they also planted 500 coconut plants about two years ago in the said land. In case, the plaintiff is entitled to any share … from D-3 and D-4 to defendants 8 and 9 and D-8 hypothecated the said property to Punganur Land Development Bank and developed the said property. Even if it is held for any reason that defendants 3 and … and a sugarcane crusher. He borrowed money from Khadi and Village Industries Board. The aforementioned properties are the absolute properties of D-7, of which plaintiff … plaintiff and defendants 1 to 4 with the seventh defendant were never acted upon and they were joint and undivided without any sub-division. The properties … rights of 10th defendant are not protected under Section 41 of the Transfer of Property Act?16. In … by D-8 by mortgaging the sale deeds dated 20-8-1979 and 29-8-1979. D.W.3 is an independent witness to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2008

Kulwant Singh Chatwal and ors. Vs. Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-13-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(6)ALT629

have been cultivating the land as under:---------------------------------------------------------------------------Sl. No. Petitioner Number Survey No Crop---------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Petitioner No. 1 303 Eucalyptus, coconut and other trees2 Petitioner No. 2 663 Castor and vegetables3 Petitioner No. 3 651 Mango garden and Farm … the subject matter viz., determination of the excess land as done under various orders of the Hyderabad Urban Development Authority. Therefore, the doctrine of merger applies with all its vigor to these cases, and the surplus area … of discharge from service and routed through District Soldiers, Sailors & Airmen's Board for assignment of Government land as required under the rules relating to … have not produced any documentary evidence to the effect that they were actively employed in agriculture before the War. These two orders are assailed in … to them and the final notification issued under Section 10(6), not to speak of all the earlier … representations. The District Collector, vide his proceedings dated 20-9-1997 rejected the said request of the petitioners. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2007

Kundanmal Sharma Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-17-2007

Subject : Commercial

Board of Revenue (Taxes), Ernakulam (supra), the question that arose for consideration before the Apex Court was whether coconut fibre was an entity separate from the husk in the commercial parlance. The count noticed that the process … Committee has to accord sanction for disbursement of the transport subsidy to the claimants through the Assam Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. or the Assam Financial Corporation. The expression ' 'finished goods' envisaged under the scheme understandably has … to promote industrial growth therein. Whereas, 'raw material' signifies the raw materials actually required by the industrial unit in its manufacturing process as approved by … scope 'manufacture' in general terms, the Apex Court with particular reference to Section 2(e-1) of the said statute answered the question in the affirmative. It … was initially valid upto 31.03.1979 was extended till 2007. In terms of the scheme, the State Level

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 1982

Gulam IntiozuddIn and ors. Vs. Secretary to Government of Andhra Prade ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-08-1982

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 - Sections 1, 2, 29 and 68; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 31(1)

Reported in : AIR1982AP397

Revenue District (whole Hyderabad district) the following were substituted, viz.,(I) Mamidi, Mango (ii) Ravi and related species (iii) Coconut, Kobbari, Tenkai (iv) Vepa, Neem (v) Imli Tamarind, Chinta, (vi) Sapota (vii) Nallathumma, Babul (viii) Regi, Ber (ix) … lands. Therefore, they have filed this writ petition to quash G. O. Ms. No. 697 Forest and Rural Development dated 31st March, 1976 and G. O. Ms. No. 165 Forest and Rural Development dated 23rd February, 1979.2. … (1949) 2 KB 481 at p. 498, Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. Rajappa : (1978)ILLJ349SC , ,Union of India v. Sankalchand, 0065/1977 : … wood or other products of those trees under the Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967, and Andhra Pradesh Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1970. They complain that … the petitioners, for they are not forests. Secondly. Sections 28-A and 28-B are unconstitutional, for they confer

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2010

The Alleppy Company Ltd., Represented by Its Director, Narayanan Venug ...

Court : Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on : Sep-03-2010

Subject : MRTP

Matched in: Court Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial