Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coconut development board act 1979 section 13 · Page 1 of about 20 results (0.069 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 02 1983

Chirukandan and ors. Vs. Superintendent, Central Excise and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Aug-02-1983

Subject : Excise

Acts : Copra Cess Act, 1979 - Sections 2, 3 and 3(1); (The Indian) Coconut Committee Act, 1944 - Sections 3; Produce Cess Act, 1966; Government of India Act, 1935; Sea Customs Act - Sections 20(2); Coconut Development Board Act, 1979 - Sections 4; Central Excise Act, 1944 - Sections 13, 14 to 17 and 19; Produce Cess Act, 1966 - Sections 15; Constitution of India - Articles 143(1), 189(1), 285, 289 and 289(1)

Reported in : 1984(15)ELT7(Ker)

the Central Government, after making certain deductions, to the Coconut Development Board established under Section 4 of the Coconut Development Board Act, 1979. It is the responsibility of an occupier of a mill to supply certain particulars and monthly returns to … exported shows that the levy is in respect of the commodity manufactured and not upon the raw material. Section 13 says that the 'provisions of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and the rules made thereunder, including

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 15 2012

P.O. Baby Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Secretary to the Gove ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam

Decided on : Oct-15-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

DPC for the post of Statistical Assistant (Group-C) will be that of Group-B post. Section 20 of the Coconut Development Board Act, 1979 read with Regulation 18 of the Coconut Development Board Regulations, 1982, empowers the Coconut Development Board to amend … well advised to cure the technical infirmity in the amendment of the Recruitment Rules without loss of time. 13. In the result, the O.A. fails and it is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs. Coconut

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 05 1995

Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd. Vs. Superintendent of Central Excise

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jul-05-1995

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1996(53)ECC41; 1995(80)ELT737(Mad)

entry. According to the learned counsel, the object of this levy is for the purpose of benefiting the Coconut Development Board Act, 1979 (Central Act 5 of 1979) and therefore, the levy under the Act insofar as it does not benefit … is made, shall assess the duty of excise in respect of the period to which the return relates. Section 13 of the Act provides for the application of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, and the Rules

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 01 2013

M/S. K.V.Jacob and Sons Vs. the State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-01-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

the Circular of the State Government herein, whereby the State directed that for distribution of pumpsets under Comprehensive Coconut Development Programme and other similar schemes of the Agriculture Department, two co-operative institutions will arrange supplies in various districts. … & T DTD. 13/08/1987. EXT.R4.E: TRUE COPY OF THE MINUTES OF THE 161ST MEETING DT. 29/12/2010 OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE KSCC. //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Prv. T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ W.P.(C).Nos. 14314/2012, 14748/2012 … in the matter of awarding contracts and other factors, the State cannot act on its will in favour of any tenderer. Shri K.Ramakumar further emphasised … in the light of the provisions of the Telegraph Act, 1885, viz. Section 4(1) and first proviso. The discretion of the Central Government to grant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 20 1984

JaIn Exports (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-20-1984

Subject : Customs

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 111

Reported in : 1987(29)ELT753(Del); ILR1985Delhi164

111(d) of the Customs Act.By the said order he directed the confiscation of 3002.557 MT of Refined Industrial Coconut oil imported by the petitioner,He gave, however, an option to the petitioner petititonerto redeem the goods on payment … exports are fashioned not only with reference to internal or international trade but also on monetary policy, the development of agriculture and industries and even on the political policies of the country but rival theories and views … oliene and palm stearine are different commodities has been up-held bya special board of Central Customs dated 28-5-82 wherein it noted that the Central Government … oil as an edible one it so clarified it as such. In 1979-80import policy Appendix 8 containing the list of items importof which was canalised … the Collector, Customs and Central Excise, Ahmedabad under Section 111(d) of the Customs Act.By the said order … Assistant Sales Tax Officer,Akola and another, 1961 Sc 1325(2) and Dunlop India Ltd.Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. v.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 2008

Assam Roller Flour Mills Association and ors. Vs. State of Assam and o ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Sep-12-2008

Subject : Civil

credited to the Marketing Board Fund, would not be expended for the development of the market but would be diverted for purposes alien to the … It has maintained that it inter alia is engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing and selling of coconut oil under its registered brand or trade marks 'Shalimar Coconut Oil', 'Rajat Coconut Oil' and 'Shalimar Mustard Oil' … 50% of its annual gross income under the Act to meet the expenses of establishment of the Board;(ii) Section 13 of the Assam Agricultural Produce Market (Amendment) Act, 2000, whereby the words 'one rupee' in Section 21 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 25 2005

N. Mahadeva Naidu and anr. Vs. P. Rasool Bee (Died) by Lrs. and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-25-2005

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act - Sections 41; Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 - Sections 34(2); Land Ceiling Act

Reported in : 2005(5)ALD614

Matched in: Advocate S.V. Bhatt, Adv. for ;E. Kalyan Ram, Adv. in FA No. 2710 of 1990 ;K.V. Reddy, Adv. in FA No. 1722 of 1992 S.V. Bhatt, Adv. for ;E. Kalyan Ram, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 in FA No. 1722 of 1992, ;K.V. Reddy, Adv. for Respondent Nos. 6, 9 to 13 in FA No. 2710 of 1990, ; Mirza Safiullah Baig, Adv. for

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 13 2008

Kulwant Singh Chatwal and ors. Vs. Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-13-2008

Subject : Service

Reported in : 2008(6)ALT629

have been cultivating the land as under:---------------------------------------------------------------------------Sl. No. Petitioner Number Survey No Crop---------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Petitioner No. 1 303 Eucalyptus, coconut and other trees2 Petitioner No. 2 663 Castor and vegetables3 Petitioner No. 3 651 Mango garden and Farm … the subject matter viz., determination of the excess land as done under various orders of the Hyderabad Urban Development Authority. Therefore, the doctrine of merger applies with all its vigor to these cases, and the surplus area … of discharge from service and routed through District Soldiers, Sailors & Airmen's Board for assignment of Government land as required under the rules relating to … have not produced any documentary evidence to the effect that they were actively employed in agriculture before the War. These two orders are assailed in … to them and the final notification issued under Section 10(6), not to speak of all the earlier … disposed of by this Court by order dated 13-7-1994 with the direction to the District Collector to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 17 2007

Kundanmal Sharma Vs. State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Mar-17-2007

Subject : Commercial

Board of Revenue (Taxes), Ernakulam (supra), the question that arose for consideration before the Apex Court was whether coconut fibre was an entity separate from the husk in the commercial parlance. The count noticed that the process … Committee has to accord sanction for disbursement of the transport subsidy to the claimants through the Assam Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. or the Assam Financial Corporation. The expression ' 'finished goods' envisaged under the scheme understandably has … to promote industrial growth therein. Whereas, 'raw material' signifies the raw materials actually required by the industrial unit in its manufacturing process as approved by … scope 'manufacture' in general terms, the Apex Court with particular reference to Section 2(e-1) of the said statute answered the question in the affirmative. It … of Assam and Anr. Respondents (2004) 3 GLT 131.6. Mr. Saikia, as against this maintained that oil

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 08 1982

Gulam IntiozuddIn and ors. Vs. Secretary to Government of Andhra Prade ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jun-08-1982

Subject : Civil

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967 - Sections 1, 2, 29 and 68; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1) and 31(1)

Reported in : AIR1982AP397

Revenue District (whole Hyderabad district) the following were substituted, viz.,(I) Mamidi, Mango (ii) Ravi and related species (iii) Coconut, Kobbari, Tenkai (iv) Vepa, Neem (v) Imli Tamarind, Chinta, (vi) Sapota (vii) Nallathumma, Babul (viii) Regi, Ber (ix) … lands. Therefore, they have filed this writ petition to quash G. O. Ms. No. 697 Forest and Rural Development dated 31st March, 1976 and G. O. Ms. No. 165 Forest and Rural Development dated 23rd February, 1979.2. … (1949) 2 KB 481 at p. 498, Bangalore Water Supply and Sewerage Board v. Rajappa : (1978)ILLJ349SC , ,Union of India v. Sankalchand, 0065/1977 : … to detain and examine the vehicle. Under R. 13 Check-posts in Sch. I, with view to stop … wood or other products of those trees under the Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, 1967, and Andhra Pradesh Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1970. They complain that … the petitioners, for they are not forests. Secondly. Sections 28-A and 28-B are unconstitutional, for they confer

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial