Advanced Search Results
The New India Assurance Company Ltd., Madurai Vs. S. Gnanaprakasam and ...
Chennai Madurai
Sep-28-2016
Land Acquisition
304(A) I.P.C. At the time of accident, the deceased was 34 years old and was working as a Coast Guard Deputy Commanding Officer and was earning a sum of Rs.21,000/- as salary per month. The deceased has further … Tribunal ought to have fixed only notional income described under Schedule II to Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles (Amendment) Act. The quantum of compensation and rate of interest is excessive. 5. Per contra, the learned counsel for the … against the fair and decreetal order dated 20.01.2005 passed in M.C.O.P.No.463 of 2002 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District and … J.Victor, son of the respondents 1 and 2, brother of the respondents 3 and 4 was driving his Maruthi Car bearing Registration No.TCU-2005 on Virudhunagar
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Customs versus M/S Canon India Pvt. Ltd.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-07-2024
Right to Information
[2024]12S.C.R.202
arrest and recording of statements, to the officers working in border states as also officers working in the coast guard or the navy as they may be involved in anti smuggling operations - Plain reading of 208 [2024] … of Customs versus Sayed Ali and Anr. (Civil Appeal Nos. 4294-4295 of 2002) held that only a customs officer who has been specifically assigned the … its applicability to the DRI officers who are none other than a class of officers of customs under Section 3 appointed pursuant to Section 4 and consequently, no entrustment is required under Section 6. He submitted that Section … 08.04.2011 since s.17 has undergone a radical change by virtue of the amendments made by the Finance Act, 2011. [Paras 81-83] Customs Act, 1962 -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSprietsma Vs. Mercury Marine
US Supreme Court
Dec-03-2002
Land Acquisition
delegated the authority to promulgate regulations establishing minimum safety standards for recreational vessels and associated equipment to the Coast Guard, which must, inter alia, consult with a special National Boating Safety Advisory Council before exercising that authority. The … ILLINOIS No. 01-706. Argued October 15, 2002-Decided December 3, 2002 Petitioner's wife was killed in a boating … standards or regulations." H. R. Rep. No. 92-324, p. 11 (1971). The statement was made prior to the amendment containing the saving clause, and nothing in the entire report suggests that it meant the occupied "field" to … Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine - 537 U.S. 51 (2002) OCTOBER TERM, 2002 Syllabus SPRIETSMA, ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF SPRIETSMA, DECEASED v. MERCURY MARINE, … Marine, a division of Brunswick Corporation (Brunswick). In his subsequent common-law tort action in Illinois state court, petitioner claimed that Brunswick's motor was unreasonably dangerous … if boating safety will not be adversely affected. Section 10 of the Act sets forth an express
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Commandant Shamsher Singh Malik Vs. Uoi and ors.
Delhi
Sep-19-2011
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Coast Guard Act 1978 - Section 123(1); Coast Guard (Seniority and Promotion) Rules 1987 - Rule 7
of the Coast Guard Act 1978, on 17.09.2004, the Central Government notified the Coast Guard (Seniority and Promotion) Amendment Rules 2004, (hereinafter referred to as the „2004 Rules) to amend certain provisions of the 1987 Rules. Relevant … 1. With the promulgation of the Coast Guard Act 1978, a cadre of Coast Guards was created by hiving off a wing of the Indian Navy. … year 1993 as Commandant. 4. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 123(1) of the Coast Guard Act 1978, the Central Government framed the … - Commandant - Commandant (Junior Grade) - Deputy Commandant - Assistant Commandant. 3. The petitioner was appointed in the year 1982 as Assistant Commandant (Technical)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMd. Abbas Mohideen Vs. Government of India Rep. by Secretary to Govern ...
Chennai
Mar-05-2008
Service
Coast Guard Act, 1978 - Sections 16, 42, 51, 51(1), 51(1A), 53(1), 61(4), 66 and 119; Coast Guard (Amendment) Act, 2002; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2); Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983 - Rules 26, 63, 64 and 65
(2008)IILLJ587Mad
passed by the second respondent wherein and by which he was given the sentence of dismissal from the Coast Guard.3. The petitioner joined the Coast Guard as an Assistant Commandant (Technical) which is Class I Group A Cadre, … Section was amended by Central Act 44 of 2002 and in the place of Section 51(1), the following amendment has been introduced:51. Period of limitation for trial of offences under the Act.--(1) No person unless he is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDig K.P.S. Raghuvanshi Vs. Union of India and ors.
Delhi
Sep-04-2014
Land Acquisition
JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI JUDGMENT : REVA KHETRAPAL, J.1. The Petitioner, a serving Deputy Inspector General (DIG) in the Coast Guard, has challenged the recommendations of the Departmental Promotional Committee (DPC) for promotion to the rank of Inspector General … the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred upon it by Section 123(1) of the Coast Guard Act, 1978, governed the field right uptil … on 13.04.2009, a proposal for the composition of DPC reiterating the earlier proposal of 01.04.2009 along with two amendments to CGO022005 was forwarded by CGHQ to MoD. The Ministry of Defence again rejected the proposal on 16.04.2009 … the holding of Selection Board. The Petitioner also seeks to challenge the actions of the Respondent No.2 (Director General) in endorsing an Annual Confidential Report … covering the period from 1st February, 2008 to 31st January, 2009 despite not having observed the performance
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChao Vs. Mallard Bay Drilling, Inc.
US Supreme Court
Jan-09-2002
Land Acquisition
waters, an explosion on board killed or injured several workers. Pursuant to its statutory authority, the United States Coast Guard investigated the incident, but did not accuse respondent of violating any of its regulations. Indeed, the Coast Guard … OSHA jurisdiction because the Coast Guard had exclusive authority to prescribe 2 Section 4(a) of the Act, as codified in 29 U. S. C. § … FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-927. Argued October 31, 200l-Decided January 9, 2002 While Rig 52, respondent's oil and gas exploration barge, was drilling a … FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 00-927. Argued October 31, 200l-Decided January 9, 2002 While Rig 52, respondent's … violations of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act or Act), 84 Stat. 1590, as amended, 29 U. S. C. § 651 et seq. (1994 ed. and Supp. V), and the Act's implementing regulations.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAli Vs. Federal Bureau of Prisons
US Supreme Court
Jan-22-2008
Land Acquisition
laws, not the customs or excise laws. Similarly, the dissent notes that 14 U. S. C. §89(a) authorizes Coast Guard officers to enforce customs laws. Post , at 5-6. But the very next subsection of §89 provides that … (per curiam); Hatten v. White , 275 F. 3d 1208, 1210 (CA10 2002); Cheney v. United States , 972 F. 2d 247, 248 (CA8 1992) … indication of any intent that immunity for those claims turns on the type of law being enforced. Recent amendments to §2680(c) restoring the sovereign immunity waiver for officers enforcing any federal forfeiture law, see §2680(c)(1), support the … 06-9130. Argued October 29, 2007-Decided January 22, 2008 The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) waives the United States’ sovereign immunity for claims arising out of … to officers enforcing customs or excise laws. Held: Section 2680(c)’s text and structure demonstrate that the broad … give effect to the text Congress enacted. Pp. 3-13. 204 Fed. Appx. 778, affirmed. Thomas, J., delivered
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDasan vs Union of India
Kerala
Jul-14-2020
25.7.2019, the relevant paragraphs of which are extracted hereunder:“11. As regards the alleged incident on board the Indian Coast Guard Ship 'Vijit' in Qatar, the 4th respondent wishes to submit the following facts: a. The reception held on … of any measures of the Government with a view to obtain an amendment of the Constitution of India or an alteration of the Indian National … of the Petitioner that the alleged acts of Respondent 4 were not in accordance with the Flag Code Act 2002 and prevention of Insult to the National Honour Act, 1971. With regard to the statement of Respondents 1 … ADMINISTRATION, MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI-110 001 3 THE JOINT SECRETARY (CNV) & CHIEF VIGILANCE OFFICER … him does not fall in the category of information as defined under Section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005”.6. The petitioner has filed a reply affidavit
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskThe Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Vs. Noble Asset Co. Ltd. and ...
Mumbai
Aug-04-2008
Customs
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 2(27), 2(28), 2(34), 4, 4(1), 5, 6, 7(6), 7(9), 21, 28, 28(1), 28(2), 45, 108, 110, 122 and 124; Territorial Waters, Continental Shelf, Exclusive Economic Zone and other Maritime Zones Act, 1976 - Sections 5; U.P. Sales Tax Act; Constitution (Fortieth Amendment) Act, 1976; State Reorgainsation Act, 1956 - Sections 8(1); Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960 - Sections 3(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 1(2), 1(3) and 297
2008(5)BomCR25; 2008(131)ECC102; 2008(157)LC102(Bombay); 2008(230)ELT22(Bom)
long coastlines in the coastal districts of Thane and Raigad and also carries out joint operations with Navy, Coast Guard and Police.It is submitted that a doubt has been raised about the implication of specific mention of the … to time, by or under any law made by Parliament. This Article was substituted by the Constitution (Fortieth Amendment) Act, 1976 and came into effect from 27th May, 1976. Article 1 of the Constitution was not amended either … was superseded by subsequent Notification which came into effect from 1st November, 2002. Even under this Notification it is the Commissioner of Customs (Import), (Export) … Section 8 of the State Reorgainsation Act, 1956, but excluding the territories referred to in Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Bombay Reorganisation Act, 1960. There is no dispute that Districts of Greater Mumbai, Thane and Kolaba
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »