Advanced Search Results

D.S. Ahluwalia Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Consittution of India - Articles 14, 16, 26 and 39

Reported in : 2004(2)JKJ503

of the State/Central Government, is essential. On the other hand, in the Coast Guard, Section 115 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978, which regulates the appointments of Chief Law Officer and other Law Officers, provides an experience of 10 years

Md. Abbas Mohidden Vs. the Director General, Coast Guard and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Coast Guard Act, 1978 - Sections 66(3)(4), 117 and 119

Reported in : 95(2003)CLT593

decided to dissolve the said Coast Guard Court in exercise of the powers under Section 66(3) of the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). It is also stated that the Director General of Coast Guard did

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Th:cbi Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

organized the landing of fire arms and ammunitions and hand grenades which was to take place on the coast of Dighi Jetty in Raigad District of State of Maharashtra on 09.01.1993. On the said date, Md. Dossa … Sayeed Mohammed Issaq (A-95), Niyaz Mohammed @ Islam Iqbal Ahmed Shaikh (A- 98), Parvez Mohammed Parvez Zulfikar Qureshi (A-100), Shaikh Ibrahim Shaikh Hussain (A-108), Sayed … and sentence passed on various dates by the Presiding Officer of the Designated Court under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (in short ‘the TADA’) for Bombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No.1 of … Bombay in BBC No.1 of 1993. These appeals have been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against their conviction and sentence

United States Vs. Locke

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

to maritime tanker transports. These include the PWSA, Title I of which authorizes, but does not require, the Coast Guard to enact measures for controlling vessel traffic or for protecting navigation and the marine environment, 33 U. S. … spilled crude oil off the coast of England in 1967, both Congress, in the Ports and Waterways Safety Act of 1972 (PWSA), and the State of Washington enacted more stringent regulations for tankers and provided for more … The Act, as amended by the Port and Tanker Safety Act of 1978, 92 Stat. 1471, contains two somewhat overlapping titles, both of which may, … of March 3, 1851 (46 U. S. C. 183 et seq.), or section 9509 of [the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U. S. C. … cases are remanded so the *Together with No. 98-1706, International Association of Independent Tanker Owners (Intertanko) v.

Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts Vs. Feeney

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

service, as defined herein, was under honorable conditions and who (b) served in the army, navy, marine corps, coast guard, or air force of the United States for not less than ninety days active service, at least one … Service law, Mass.Gen.Laws Ann., ch. 31, was recodified on January 1, 1979, 1978 Mass. Acts, ch. 393, and the veterans' preference is now found at … 21. When this litigation was commenced, then, over 98% of the veterans in Massachusetts were male; only … a nurse," who was honorably discharged from the United States Armed Forces after at least 90 days of active service, at least one day of which was during "wartime," operates overwhelmingly to the advantage of males. Appellee … the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Section 712 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-11, provides that "[n]othing contained

United States Vs. Albertini

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the statute, which provides: "Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, goes upon any military, naval, or Coast Guard Reservation, post, fort, arsenal, yard, station, or installation, for any purpose prohibited by law or lawful regulation; or" … 449 U.S. 984 (1980); United States v. Douglass, 579 F.2d 545 (CA9 1978) (16 days after bar letter, 1 day after verbal order not to … judge found that this testimony was accurate, Tr. 98, and we see no reason to disturb that … race, but respondent only took photographs of the displays at the open house, and did not disrupt the activities there. The commanding officer directed the chief of the security police to have the individuals cease their demonstration, … the base had been transformed into a temporary public forum. Held: 1. Section 1382 applies to respondent's conduct. Viewed in light of the ordinary meaning

Altria Group, Inc. Vs. Good

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

a policy of approval. Cf. Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine , 537 U. S. 51 (2002) (holding that the Coast Guard’s decision not to regulate propeller guards did not impliedly pre-empt petitioner’s tort claims).[ Footnote 14 ] More … in Wolens was the pre-emptive effect of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (ADA), 49 U. S. C. App. §1305(a)(1) (1988 ed.), which prohibits States … Footnote 5 Comprehensive Smoking Education Act, Pub. L. 98-474, §4(a), 98 Stat. 2201, 15 U. S. C. … 2008 Respondents, smokers of petitioners’ “light” cigarettes, filed suit, alleging that petitioners violated the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act (MUTPA) by fraudulently advertising that their “light” cigarettes delivered less tar and nicotine than regular brands. The District … second purpose. As amended, the Labeling Act contains two express pre-emption provisions. Section 5(a) protects cigarette manufacturers from inconsistent state labeling laws by prohibiting the

Eeoc Vs. Arabian American Oil Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

permanent foreign establishment) of any domestic concern which is controlled in fact by such domestic concern") § 2415(2); Coast Guard Act, 14 U.S.C. § 89(a) (Coast Guard searches and seizures upon the high seas); 18 U.S.C. § 7 (Criminal … corporation whose place of incorporation is in a foreign country, any practice by such corporation prohibited under this section shall be presumed to be such practice by such employer." 29 U.S.C. § 623(h)(1). The expressed purpose of … in foreign countries by United States corporations or their subsidiaries." S.Rep. No. 98-467, p. 2 (1984), U.S. Code Cong. & Admin.News 1984, pp. 2974, 2975.