Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coast guard act 1978 section 92 · Page 1 of about 7 results (0.036 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 21 2012

Ex.Uttam Navik Dalbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-21-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

(O.O.D). The petitioner’scontention is that the very act of admonishing an employee is a punishment prescribed under the Coast Guard Act, 1978 which fact was also admitted by the OOD as well in his statement during the enquiry. 4. The … Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983. The charges framed against the petitioner were as under:- “(i) FIRST CHARGE: Under Section 19 (a) of Coast Guard Act, 1978:- USING CRIMINAL FORCE TO HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER. In that he, did, … 1983 prescribe the procedure for the Coast Guard Courts, wherein specifically Rules 92 and 93 deal with the aspect of the finding, pursuant to trial

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Th:cbi Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

organized the landing of fire arms and ammunitions and hand grenades which was to take place on the coast of Dighi Jetty in Raigad District of State of Maharashtra on 09.01.1993. On the said date, Md. Dossa … and sentence passed on various dates by the Presiding Officer of the Designated Court under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (in short ‘the TADA’) for Bombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No.1 of … Bombay in BBC No.1 of 1993. These appeals have been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against their conviction and sentence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2000

United States Vs. Locke

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-06-2000

Subject : Land Acquisition

to maritime tanker transports. These include the PWSA, Title I of which authorizes, but does not require, the Coast Guard to enact measures for controlling vessel traffic or for protecting navigation and the marine environment, 33 U. S. … The Act, as amended by the Port and Tanker Safety Act of 1978, 92 Stat. 1471, contains two somewhat overlapping titles, both of which may, … spilled crude oil off the coast of England in 1967, both Congress, in the Ports and Waterways Safety Act of 1972 (PWSA), and the State of Washington enacted more stringent regulations for tankers and provided for more … of March 3, 1851 (46 U. S. C. 183 et seq.), or section 9509 of [the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U. S. C.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jun 27 1980

United States Vs. Ward

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-27-1980

Subject : Service Tax

Arkansas River system, respondent notified the Environmental Protection Agency of the discharge, and this was reported to the Coast Guard, who assessed a $500 penalty against respondent under § 311(b)(6). After his administrative appeal was denied, respondent filed … 91 Stat. 1566, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1978, Pub.L. 95-576, 92 Stat. 2468. Except as noted, those amendments have no … UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Section 311(b)(3) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act prohibits the discharge of oil into navigable waters. Section 311(b)(5) requires any person in charge of an onshore

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1985

Herb's Welding, Inc. Vs. Gray

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-18-1985

Subject : Land Acquisition

several emphatically nonmaritime locales. Undeterred, the dissent points out that Congress left regulation of offshore platforms to the Coast Guard. Yet one would not have expected otherwise, since geographically the platforms fall within the Coast Guard's jurisdiction. No … TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Syllabus The Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA), as amended in 1972, provides compensation for the death or disability of any person engaged in "maritime … consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. [ Footnote 1 ] Section 2(3) of the Act, 86 Stat. 1251, 33 U.S.C. § 902(3), provides: … the latter involved the "[e]xtension of [c]overage to [s]horeside [a]reas," H.R.Rep. No 92-1441, p. 10 (1972), and the absence of any mention of drilling platforms

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1992

Smt. Hawabi Sayed Arif Sayed Hanif Vs. L. Hmingliana and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-14-1992

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 3, 8 and 9; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Sections 3(3) and 10(1)

Reported in : AIR1993SC810; 1993(1)ALT(Cri)521; 1993(41)BLJR248; 1993CriLJ172; 1992(3)Crimes635(SC); 1993(42)ECC12; JT1992(6)SC162; 1992(2)SCALE796; (1993)1SCC163

collected by the officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, a surveillance was maintained by the officers on Coast Guard vessel O.G. 'VIGRAH' in the sea off Karwar for a suspect Arab Dhow carrying foreign silver to smuggle … Customs Act, 1962 (as substituted for certain words by Act 25 of 1978) which defines Indian Customs Waters as waters extending into sea up to … conferred on him under Sub-section (1) Section 3 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') with a view to preventing him from smuggling of goods.3.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1981

ScIndia Steam Nav. Co., Ltd. Vs. Santos

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-21-1981

Subject : Land Acquisition

but not the duty, to repair. Tr. of Oral Arg. 10. [ Footnote 25 ] The United States Coast Guard has issued regulations with respect to the gear and equipment of cargo ships. 46 CFR Ch. 1, Subchapter … suits. See, e.g., Canizzo v. Farrell Lines, Inc., 579 F.2d 682 (CA2 1978); Gay v. Ocean Transport & Trading, Ltd., 546 F.2d 1233 (CA5 1977); … the winch. Respondent longshoreman brought suit against petitioner under the provision of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act as amended in 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 905(b), which states that a longshoreman injured "by the negligence of … such vessel as a third party in accordance with the provisions of section 933 of this title, and the employer shall not be liable to … of this case. [ Footnote 1 ] Pub.L. 92-576, 6 Stat. 1251, amending 33 U.S.C. §§ 901-950.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial