Advanced Search Results

Dig K.P.S. Raghuvanshi Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

framed by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred upon it by Section 123(1) of the Coast Guard Act, 1978, governed the field right uptil September, 2004. Till then, all promotions in the Coast Guards, which in fact

United States Vs. Villamonte-marquez

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

et seq. (1976 ed., Supp. V). Many of these vessels must also submit to periodic inspection by the Coast Guard and a "certificate of inspection" must be kept on the vessel at all times. 46 U.S.C. §§ 399, … v. Babbitt, 104 U. S. 767 (1882); Evans v. Phillips, 4 Wheat. 73 (1819). Yet that is precisely what the Court permits the Government to … Amendment because the boarding occurred in the absence of "a reasonable suspicion of a law violation." Held: The action of the customs officers in boarding the sailboat pursuant to § 1581(a) was "reasonable," and was therefore consistent … of ships or vessels." Act of Aug. 4, 1790, 1 Stat. 145. Section 31 of that Act provided in pertinent part as follows: "That it

Smt. Meena Jayendra Thakur Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 22(5); The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Summggling Activities Act - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 5, 5A, 8, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 10 and 11

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2533

away from Karwar harbour. It was found moving slowly towards Karwar and on suspicion the officers on the coast guard ship signalled with loud speaker and search lights for the Arab Dhow to stop. The Arab Dhow, instead … Customs Act, 1962 (as substituted for certain words by Act 25 of 1978) which defines, Indian Customs Waters as waters extending into sea up to … detenu. We, therefore, agree with the High Court and dismiss the appeal.' 73. As far as the detenue in our case is concerned, we find … Mantralaya, Bombay - 400032 issued under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the COFEPOSA Act'). She also seeks to impugn the declaration bearing No.

Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts Vs. Feeney

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

service, as defined herein, was under honorable conditions and who (b) served in the army, navy, marine corps, coast guard, or air force of the United States for not less than ninety days active service, at least one … Service law, Mass.Gen.Laws Ann., ch. 31, was recodified on January 1, 1979, 1978 Mass. Acts, ch. 393, and the veterans' preference is now found at … a nurse," who was honorably discharged from the United States Armed Forces after at least 90 days of active service, at least one day of which was during "wartime," operates overwhelmingly to the advantage of males. Appellee … the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Section 712 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-11, provides that "[n]othing contained … Code Ann. § 34-30-11 (1953); Wash.Rev.Code §§ 41.04.010, 73.16.010 (1976). [ Footnote 8 ] Massachusetts Gen.Laws Ann.,

United States Vs. Alvarez

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

U. S. C. §§3741 (Army), 6241 (Navy and Marine Corps), 8741 (Air Force), 14 U. S. C. §491 (Coast Guard). The stories of those who earned the Medal inspire and fascinate, from Dakota Meyer who in 2009 drove … of whether it was false or not”); see also Garrison, supra, at 73 (“[E]ven when the utterance is false, the great principles of the Constitution … of appeals for the ninth circuit No. 11-210. Argued February 22, 2012-Decided June 28, 2012 The Stolen Valor Act makes it a crime to falsely claim receipt of military decorations or medals and provides an enhanced penalty … . makes any mate-rially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or repre-sentation.” §1001. Section 1001’s prohibition on false statements made to Government officials, in communications concerning

Sooraram Pratap Reddy and ors. Vs. District Collector, Ranga Reddy Dis ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 1, 3, 4 to 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(4), 18 to 28A, 29 to 30, 31 to 34, 35 to 37, 38 to 44B, 45 to 55; Andhra Pradesh Urban Area Development Act, 1975; Zoning Regulations; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1923; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950; Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948; Infrastructure Development Act; Andhra Pradesh Infrastructure Development Enabling Act, 2001; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1962 - Sections 40(1); Industries Development and Regulation Act, 1951; Delhi Development Act, 1957; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : 2008(6)ALD19(SC); 2008(4)AWC3875(SC); JT2008(9)SC622; RLW2008(4)SC2794; 2008(12)SCALE367; (2008)9SCC552; 2008(6)Supreme402; (2007) 1 SCC64125

remainder of the development, including the state park. This parcel also includes space reserved for a new U.S. Coast Guard Museum. Parcel 3, which is located immediately north of the Pfizer facility, will contain at least 90,000 square … said orders, the High Court rejected the prayer of the appellants for quashing proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act') for acquisition of land being illegal, unlawful, mala fide and in … foreign company and few selected persons with vested interest.4. A notification under Section 4 of the Act was published in the State Government Gazette on

Eeoc Vs. Arabian American Oil Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

permanent foreign establishment) of any domestic concern which is controlled in fact by such domestic concern") § 2415(2); Coast Guard Act, 14 U.S.C. § 89(a) (Coast Guard searches and seizures upon the high seas); 18 U.S.C. § 7 (Criminal … -286; Skiriotes v. Florida, 313 U. S. 69 , 313 U. S. 73 -74 (1941). [ Footnote 2 ] Because petitioners advance a construction of … corporation whose place of incorporation is in a foreign country, any practice by such corporation prohibited under this section shall be presumed to be such practice by such employer." 29 U.S.C. § 623(h)(1). The expressed purpose of

Altria Group, Inc. Vs. Good

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

a policy of approval. Cf. Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine , 537 U. S. 51 (2002) (holding that the Coast Guard’s decision not to regulate propeller guards did not impliedly pre-empt petitioner’s tort claims).[ Footnote 14 ] More … in Wolens was the pre-emptive effect of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (ADA), 49 U. S. C. App. §1305(a)(1) (1988 ed.), which prohibits States … its 1966 guidance concerning the Cambridge Filter Method. 73 Fed. Reg. 74500. The rescission is a response … 2008 Respondents, smokers of petitioners’ “light” cigarettes, filed suit, alleging that petitioners violated the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act (MUTPA) by fraudulently advertising that their “light” cigarettes delivered less tar and nicotine than regular brands. The District … second purpose. As amended, the Labeling Act contains two express pre-emption provisions. Section 5(a) protects cigarette manufacturers from inconsistent state labeling laws by prohibiting the