Advanced Search Results

Hi-tech Engineers Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 72 and 90

Reported in : 2003(161)ELT96(Bom)

Guard is an armed force of the Union, under the Ministry of Defence, and is governed by the Coast Guard Act, 1978.7. Mr. Nankani, however, strongly urged that on realising the mistake committed by the petitioners in obtaining clearance … as to why duty amount of Rs. 83,18,712/- should not be demanded and recovered from the petitioners under Section 72 read with Section 28(1) of the Customs Act. By the said notice, the petitioners were also called upon

Hi-tech Engineers Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28, 72, 88, 88A, 90 and 124

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR776

Guard is an armed force of the Union, under the Ministry of Defence, and is governed by the Coast Guard Act, 1978.7. Mr. Nankani, however, strongly urged that on realising the mistake committed by the petitioners in obtaining clearance … as to why duty amount of Rs. 83,18,742/- should not be demanded and recovered from the petitioners under section 72 read with section 28(1) of the Customs Act. By the said notice, the petitioners were also called upon

Smt. Hawabi Sayed Arif Sayed Hanif Vs. L. Hmingliana and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 3, 8 and 9; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Sections 3(3) and 10(1)

Reported in : AIR1993SC810; 1993(1)ALT(Cri)521; 1993(41)BLJR248; 1993CriLJ172; 1992(3)Crimes635(SC); 1993(42)ECC12; JT1992(6)SC162; 1992(2)SCALE796; (1993)1SCC163

collected by the officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, a surveillance was maintained by the officers on Coast Guard vessel O.G. 'VIGRAH' in the sea off Karwar for a suspect Arab Dhow carrying foreign silver to smuggle … Customs Act, 1962 (as substituted for certain words by Act 25 of 1978) which defines Indian Customs Waters as waters extending into sea up to … conferred on him under Sub-section (1) Section 3 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') with a view to preventing him from smuggling of goods.3.

Smt. Meena Jayendra Thakur Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 22(5); The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Summggling Activities Act - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 5, 5A, 8, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 10 and 11

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2533

away from Karwar harbour. It was found moving slowly towards Karwar and on suspicion the officers on the coast guard ship signalled with loud speaker and search lights for the Arab Dhow to stop. The Arab Dhow, instead … Customs Act, 1962 (as substituted for certain words by Act 25 of 1978) which defines, Indian Customs Waters as waters extending into sea up to … detenu and his activities of smuggling goods within the State of Maharashtra.' 72. In the case of A. Alangarasamy v. State of Tamil Nadu, reported … Mantralaya, Bombay - 400032 issued under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the COFEPOSA Act'). She also seeks to impugn the declaration bearing No.

Hamdan Vs. Rumsfeld

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

the Articles of War, the Articles for the Government of the Navy, and the disciplinary laws of the Coast Guard”). There is no indication that the UCMJ was intended to require uniformity in procedure between courts-martial and military … has convened to try Hamdan is unauthorized. Ante , at 62, 69-70, 72. The following analysis, which expands on the Court’s discussion, explains my reasons … treaty the United States has ratified and thus accepted as binding law. See id. , at 3316. By Act of Congress, moreover, violations of Common Article 3 are considered “war crimes,” punishable as federal offenses, when committed … applied here in conformity with §821, parallels the practicability standard of §836(b). Section 836, however, is limited by its terms to matters properly characterized as

Sooraram Pratap Reddy and ors. Vs. District Collector, Ranga Reddy Dis ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 1, 3, 4 to 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(4), 18 to 28A, 29 to 30, 31 to 34, 35 to 37, 38 to 44B, 45 to 55; Andhra Pradesh Urban Area Development Act, 1975; Zoning Regulations; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1923; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950; Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948; Infrastructure Development Act; Andhra Pradesh Infrastructure Development Enabling Act, 2001; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1962 - Sections 40(1); Industries Development and Regulation Act, 1951; Delhi Development Act, 1957; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : 2008(6)ALD19(SC); 2008(4)AWC3875(SC); JT2008(9)SC622; RLW2008(4)SC2794; 2008(12)SCALE367; (2008)9SCC552; 2008(6)Supreme402; (2007) 1 SCC64125

remainder of the development, including the state park. This parcel also includes space reserved for a new U.S. Coast Guard Museum. Parcel 3, which is located immediately north of the Pfizer facility, will contain at least 90,000 square … said orders, the High Court rejected the prayer of the appellants for quashing proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act') for acquisition of land being illegal, unlawful, mala fide and in … foreign company and few selected persons with vested interest.4. A notification under Section 4 of the Act was published in the State Government Gazette on

Leo Sheep Co. Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

were no major engagements during the Civil War in the area between the Missouri River and the west coast which would be covered by any transcontinental railroad, there were two minor engagements which doubtless made some impression … entire restoration, it becomes us, with statesmanlike prudence and sagacity, to look carefully into the future and to guard in advance against all possible considerations which may threaten the dismemberment of the country hereafter." Cong.Globe, 37th Cong., … v. Union Pacific R. Co., 91 U. S. 72 , 91 U. S. 79 (1875). In this … STAETS COURT OP APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus The Union Pacific Act of 1862 granted public land to the Union Pacific Railroad for each … Pacific Railroad, it implicitly reserved an easement to pass over the odd-numbered sections in order to reach the even-numbered sections held by the Government. Held: