Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coast guard act 1978 section 69 · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.044 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jun 09 2010

Sk.Singh .. Vs. the Director General, Coast Guard Headquarters, and or ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-09-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

respondent, for a judicial review of the trial proceedings in accordance with sections 117 and 118 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978. The judicial proceedings were conducted by the Chief Law Officer on 9th September, 2002 at the Coast Guard … of 13 contained in the charge sheet and awarded the sentence of dismissal from service, as provided under section 53 of the Coast Guard Act, by its order dated 5th June, 2002. The copies of the coast … to any other sentence which the court might have passed. In Rule 69 it is provided that the proceedings of a general court martial shall

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 03 2005

Capt. Parveen Rawat and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : Dec-03-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 409, 420 and 467; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 52F and 69; ;Army (Amendment) Act, 1987; ;Army Regulations; ;Navy Act; ;Air Force Act - Section 176; ;Army Courts and Criminal Courts Rules; ;Court-martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rule 3, 4, 5 and 6; ;Criminal Procedusre Code , Svt. 1989 - Sections 1, 1(2), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 167, 428, 475, 549 and 561A; ;Constitution of India - Article 20; ;Army Rules

been framed. Under Rule 3 it is provided that where a person subject to military, naval.air force or coast guard law or any other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union for the time being in … Criminal Courts, Rules called Criminal Court and Court-martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules 1978 have been framed. Under Rule 3 it is provided that where a … offence Under Section 52F and 45 of Army Act whereas petitioner No. 4 for commission of offence Under Section 69 of the said Act. Summary of evidence is being collected and recorded. It is admitted case of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 1982

California State Lands Comm'n Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-18-1982

Subject : Land Acquisition

] Since that time, the land has been continuously possessed by the United States and used as a Coast Guard Reservation. The Pacific shoreline along the Coast Guard site remained subtantially unchanged until near the turn of the … 284 U. S. 545 -546 (1932). [ Footnote 5 ] In May, 1978, California transmitted a proposed permit to the United States to allow construction … , quoting Banks v. Ogden, 2 Wall. 57, 69 U. S. 67 (1865). We rejected the invitation … deciding the substantive legal issue. Congress addressed the issue of accretions to federal land in the Submerged Lands Act, which vested title in the States to the lands underlying the territorial sea and confirmed the title of … belong to the upland owner. Pp. 457 U. S. 285 -286. (d) Section 2(a)(3) of the Submerged Lands Act, defining "lands beneath navigable waters" that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 20 1995

Smt. Meena Jayendra Thakur Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-20-1995

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 22(5); The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Summggling Activities Act - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 5, 5A, 8, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 10 and 11

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2533

away from Karwar harbour. It was found moving slowly towards Karwar and on suspicion the officers on the coast guard ship signalled with loud speaker and search lights for the Arab Dhow to stop. The Arab Dhow, instead … Customs Act, 1962 (as substituted for certain words by Act 25 of 1978) which defines, Indian Customs Waters as waters extending into sea up to … of mind and is per se mala fide and null and void. 69. In support of his contention Shri Karmali has placed reliance on a … Mantralaya, Bombay - 400032 issued under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the COFEPOSA Act'). She also seeks to impugn the declaration bearing No.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 05 1979

Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts Vs. Feeney

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-05-1979

Subject : Land Acquisition

service, as defined herein, was under honorable conditions and who (b) served in the army, navy, marine corps, coast guard, or air force of the United States for not less than ninety days active service, at least one … Service law, Mass.Gen.Laws Ann., ch. 31, was recodified on January 1, 1979, 1978 Mass. Acts, ch. 393, and the veterans' preference is now found at … 5, Fifth (West Supp. 1979); Mass.Gen.Laws Ann., ch. 69, §§ 7, 7B (West Supp. 1979); and Mass.Gen.Laws … a nurse," who was honorably discharged from the United States Armed Forces after at least 90 days of active service, at least one day of which was during "wartime," operates overwhelmingly to the advantage of males. Appellee … the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Section 712 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-11, provides that "[n]othing contained

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 2008

Jawahar Santhakumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Represented by Secretary ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Apr-17-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 5(1); Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Services - Rule 39; IAS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, 1955 - Regulation 5(1); Indian Administrative Service (Recruitment) Rules, 1954 - Rules 4(2), 8(1) and 9; Constitution of India - Article 14

Reported in : (2008)5MLJ994

reasonable and non-arbitrary manner, otherwise Article 14 of the Constitution would be violated.13. In O. Konavalov v. Commander, Coast Guard Region and Ors. : 2006(197)ELT3(SC) , it has been held by the Honourable Apex Court that 'the State … Officer (DRO) w.e.f. 25.1.1995, without promoting him, he filed O.A. No. 1 69 of 1995 before the Tribunal, praying to consider his name for inclusion … Member in deciding the matter, after the Chairman demitted the office, quoting Section 5(1) of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and a judgment of this Court in a Writ Petition, holding that such orders passed by a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 05 2008

Sooraram Pratap Reddy and ors. Vs. District Collector, Ranga Reddy Dis ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-05-2008

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 1, 3, 4 to 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(4), 18 to 28A, 29 to 30, 31 to 34, 35 to 37, 38 to 44B, 45 to 55; Andhra Pradesh Urban Area Development Act, 1975; Zoning Regulations; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1923; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950; Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948; Infrastructure Development Act; Andhra Pradesh Infrastructure Development Enabling Act, 2001; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1962 - Sections 40(1); Industries Development and Regulation Act, 1951; Delhi Development Act, 1957; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : 2008(6)ALD19(SC); 2008(4)AWC3875(SC); JT2008(9)SC622; RLW2008(4)SC2794; 2008(12)SCALE367; (2008)9SCC552; 2008(6)Supreme402; (2007) 1 SCC64125

remainder of the development, including the state park. This parcel also includes space reserved for a new U.S. Coast Guard Museum. Parcel 3, which is located immediately north of the Pfizer facility, will contain at least 90,000 square … said orders, the High Court rejected the prayer of the appellants for quashing proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act') for acquisition of land being illegal, unlawful, mala fide and in … foreign company and few selected persons with vested interest.4. A notification under Section 4 of the Act was published in the State Government Gazette on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1986

Sri Mulchand Phoolchand JaIn Vs. Collector of Customs (P)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-18-1986

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1987)(13)LC101Tri(Mum.)bai

finding that all the 89 silver ingots in question were brought to Kamathipura which is near the sea coast of India and were attempted to be smuggled out of India in contravention of the provisions of Section … and he was merely a custodian. Neither Shri Lokhandwalla nor his servants who were alleged to be on guard duty, disclosed either at the time of seizure or subsequent to it, that the silver ingots were belonging … The terms of the consent memo are: 1. Order dated 7th June, 1978 (a copy whereof is Exhibit 'G' to the Petition) set aside. Revision … the Customs Act with effect from 3rd Jan. 69. The restrictions regarding intimation of place of storage, … officers of the Marine and Preventive Division, Bombay on 19.11.1966 for taking action under the Customs law. After a month thereafter, the appellant Mulchand P.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1991

Eeoc Vs. Arabian American Oil Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-26-1991

Subject : Land Acquisition

permanent foreign establishment) of any domestic concern which is controlled in fact by such domestic concern") § 2415(2); Coast Guard Act, 14 U.S.C. § 89(a) (Coast Guard searches and seizures upon the high seas); 18 U.S.C. § 7 (Criminal … at 344 U. S. 285 -286; Skiriotes v. Florida, 313 U. S. 69 , 313 U. S. 73 -74 (1941). [ Footnote 2 ] Because … corporation whose place of incorporation is in a foreign country, any practice by such corporation prohibited under this section shall be presumed to be such practice by such employer." 29 U.S.C. § 623(h)(1). The expressed purpose of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial