Advanced Search Results
Md. Abbas Mohideen Vs. Government of India Rep. by Secretary to Govern ...
Chennai
Mar-05-2008
Service
Coast Guard Act, 1978 - Sections 16, 42, 51, 51(1), 51(1A), 53(1), 61(4), 66 and 119; Coast Guard (Amendment) Act, 2002; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2); Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983 - Rules 26, 63, 64 and 65
(2008)IILLJ587Mad
water leading to deterioration of material state of starboard D.A thereby committed an offence under Section 16 of Coast Guard Act, 1978.b. Knowingly concealed the vital information of sea water ingress in star board D.A from his Commanding Officer, administrative … of the C.G. Rules, the learned Assistant Solicitor General of India contended by referring to Rules 63 and 65 of the C.G. Rules that the objections regarding jurisdiction and limitation should have been raised before the authorities
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCalifornia State Lands Comm'n Vs. United States
US Supreme Court
Jun-18-1982
Land Acquisition
] Since that time, the land has been continuously possessed by the United States and used as a Coast Guard Reservation. The Pacific shoreline along the Coast Guard site remained subtantially unchanged until near the turn of the … 284 U. S. 545 -546 (1932). [ Footnote 5 ] In May, 1978, California transmitted a proposed permit to the United States to allow construction … deciding the substantive legal issue. Congress addressed the issue of accretions to federal land in the Submerged Lands Act, which vested title in the States to the lands underlying the territorial sea and confirmed the title of … belong to the upland owner. Pp. 457 U. S. 285 -286. (d) Section 2(a)(3) of the Submerged Lands Act, defining "lands beneath navigable waters" that … Wilson v. Omaha Indian Tribe, 442 U. S. 653 . Under federal law, accretion, whatever its cause,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnited States Vs. Villamonte-marquez
US Supreme Court
Jun-17-1983
Land Acquisition
et seq. (1976 ed., Supp. V). Many of these vessels must also submit to periodic inspection by the Coast Guard and a "certificate of inspection" must be kept on the vessel at all times. 46 U.S.C. §§ 399, … Amendment because the boarding occurred in the absence of "a reasonable suspicion of a law violation." Held: The action of the customs officers in boarding the sailboat pursuant to § 1581(a) was "reasonable," and was therefore consistent … of ships or vessels." Act of Aug. 4, 1790, 1 Stat. 145. Section 31 of that Act provided in pertinent part as follows: "That it … case, while not minimal, is limited. Pp. 462 U. S. 584 -593. 652 F.2d 481, reversed. REHNQUIST, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
P. Perumal Vs. A.V. Sureshbabu,
Chennai
Apr-04-2007
Service
Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules - Rules 2(1), 9, 10, 16B and 27; Service Commission Regulations - Regulations 8 and 16; Promotion Regulations - Regulation 9
(2007)4MLJ160
of State policy or practice, which can claim exemption from the judicial consideration, vide O. Konalov v. Commander, Coast Guard Region : 2006(197)ELT3(SC) . However, as already adverted to supra, we are not deciding in these writ petitions … II in July 1959, and has challenged the constitutional validity of the 1978 Rules. Mr. Singhvi, the learned Counsel for the respondents, took a preliminary … the pendency of the said contempt proceedings, the Government issued G.O.Ms. No. 65 Social Welfare Department, dated 28.4.2003, regularising the services of the respondents and … Verma and Ors. v. State of Bihar and Ors. : (1997)IILLJ78SC wherein it was held:Section 6(3) of the Act only empowers the authority to appoint the Secretary and other Officers and employees of the Authority. The power
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSmt. Meena Jayendra Thakur Vs. the Union of India and Others
Mumbai
Jan-20-1995
Criminal
Constitution of India - Articles 22 and 22(5); The Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Summggling Activities Act - Sections 2, 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3), 5, 5A, 8, 9, 9(1), 9(2), 10 and 11
1995CriLJ2533
away from Karwar harbour. It was found moving slowly towards Karwar and on suspicion the officers on the coast guard ship signalled with loud speaker and search lights for the Arab Dhow to stop. The Arab Dhow, instead … Customs Act, 1962 (as substituted for certain words by Act 25 of 1978) which defines, Indian Customs Waters as waters extending into sea up to … said letter that the detention order may be served on the detenue. 65. It is clear that the fact that the detenu was in custody … Mantralaya, Bombay - 400032 issued under section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'the COFEPOSA Act'). She also seeks to impugn the declaration bearing No.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHamdan Vs. Rumsfeld
US Supreme Court
Jun-29-2006
MRTP
the Articles of War, the Articles for the Government of the Navy, and the disciplinary laws of the Coast Guard”). There is no indication that the UCMJ was intended to require uniformity in procedure between courts-martial and military … treaty the United States has ratified and thus accepted as binding law. See id. , at 3316. By Act of Congress, moreover, violations of Common Article 3 are considered “war crimes,” punishable as federal offenses, when committed … applied here in conformity with §821, parallels the practicability standard of §836(b). Section 836, however, is limited by its terms to matters properly characterized as … the use of a military commission to try Hamdan. Ante , at 65-70; see also 415 F. 3d 33, 44 (CADC 2005) (Williams, J., concurring).
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSooraram Pratap Reddy and ors. Vs. District Collector, Ranga Reddy Dis ...
Supreme Court of India
Sep-05-2008
Property
Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 1, 3, 4 to 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(4), 18 to 28A, 29 to 30, 31 to 34, 35 to 37, 38 to 44B, 45 to 55; Andhra Pradesh Urban Area Development Act, 1975; Zoning Regulations; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1923; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950; Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948; Infrastructure Development Act; Andhra Pradesh Infrastructure Development Enabling Act, 2001; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1962 - Sections 40(1); Industries Development and Regulation Act, 1951; Delhi Development Act, 1957; Constitution of Ind
2008(6)ALD19(SC); 2008(4)AWC3875(SC); JT2008(9)SC622; RLW2008(4)SC2794; 2008(12)SCALE367; (2008)9SCC552; 2008(6)Supreme402; (2007) 1 SCC64125
remainder of the development, including the state park. This parcel also includes space reserved for a new U.S. Coast Guard Museum. Parcel 3, which is located immediately north of the Pfizer facility, will contain at least 90,000 square … said orders, the High Court rejected the prayer of the appellants for quashing proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act') for acquisition of land being illegal, unlawful, mala fide and in … foreign company and few selected persons with vested interest.4. A notification under Section 4 of the Act was published in the State Government Gazette on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›