Advanced Search Results

Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts Vs. Feeney

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

service, as defined herein, was under honorable conditions and who (b) served in the army, navy, marine corps, coast guard, or air force of the United States for not less than ninety days active service, at least one … Service law, Mass.Gen.Laws Ann., ch. 31, was recodified on January 1, 1979, 1978 Mass. Acts, ch. 393, and the veterans' preference is now found at … a nurse," who was honorably discharged from the United States Armed Forces after at least 90 days of active service, at least one day of which was during "wartime," operates overwhelmingly to the advantage of males. Appellee … the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. Section 712 of the Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-11, provides that "[n]othing contained … of the Justices, 166 Mass. 589, 44 N.E. 625 (1896). In 1919, when the preference was extended

S. Chaoba Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; Constitution of India (47th Amendment) Act, 1976; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 19 and 25

1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 1968), the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (30 of 1978), and the National Security Guard Act, 1986 (47 of 1986).(2) For the removal of doubts, … is charged with :-BSF Act Abetment of commissions of an offence by a public servant Sec. 46 under Section 7 punishable under Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.In that, they while on OP duty at

Commodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98

1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), The Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 11968), the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (30 of 1978), and the National Security Guard Act, 1986 (47 of 1986).(2) For the removal of doubts, … of the petitioners were overruled and the Court Martial proceeded further. The petitioner was arraigned in terms of Section 106 of the Navy Act and the petitioner pleaded not guilty to all the charges.4. The contentions raised

United States Vs. Ward

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Service Tax

Arkansas River system, respondent notified the Environmental Protection Agency of the discharge, and this was reported to the Coast Guard, who assessed a $500 penalty against respondent under § 311(b)(6). After his administrative appeal was denied, respondent filed … 91 Stat. 1566, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1978, Pub.L. 95-576, 92 Stat. 2468. Except as noted, those amendments have no … U. S. 39 , and Grosso v. United States, 390 U. S. 62 , statutes that are plainly designed to obtain information from a limited … UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Section 311(b)(3) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act prohibits the discharge of oil into navigable waters. Section 311(b)(5) requires any person in charge of an onshore

California State Lands Comm'n Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

] Since that time, the land has been continuously possessed by the United States and used as a Coast Guard Reservation. The Pacific shoreline along the Coast Guard site remained subtantially unchanged until near the turn of the … 284 U. S. 545 -546 (1932). [ Footnote 5 ] In May, 1978, California transmitted a proposed permit to the United States to allow construction … In relevant part, § 5(a) of the Act, 62 Stat. 32, 43 U.S.C. 1313(a), excepts from the … deciding the substantive legal issue. Congress addressed the issue of accretions to federal land in the Submerged Lands Act, which vested title in the States to the lands underlying the territorial sea and confirmed the title of … belong to the upland owner. Pp. 457 U. S. 285 -286. (d) Section 2(a)(3) of the Submerged Lands Act, defining "lands beneath navigable waters" that

United States Vs. Albertini

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the statute, which provides: "Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, goes upon any military, naval, or Coast Guard Reservation, post, fort, arsenal, yard, station, or installation, for any purpose prohibited by law or lawful regulation; or" … 449 U.S. 984 (1980); United States v. Douglass, 579 F.2d 545 (CA9 1978) (16 days after bar letter, 1 day after verbal order not to … 285 U. S. 22 , 285 U. S. 62 (1932). Courts in applying criminal laws generally must … race, but respondent only took photographs of the displays at the open house, and did not disrupt the activities there. The commanding officer directed the chief of the security police to have the individuals cease their demonstration, … the base had been transformed into a temporary public forum. Held: 1. Section 1382 applies to respondent's conduct. Viewed in light of the ordinary meaning

Ali Vs. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

laws, not the customs or excise laws. Similarly, the dissent notes that 14 U. S. C. §89(a) authorizes Coast Guard officers to enforce customs laws. Post , at 5-6. But the very next subsection of §89 provides that … Secret Serv. Dept. of Treasury , 593 F. 2d 849, 851 (CA9 1978) (Tang, J., concurring) (“The clauses both dwell exclusively on customs and taxes, … appeals for the eleventh circuit No. 06-9130. Argued October 29, 2007-Decided January 22, 2008 The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) waives the United States’ sovereign immunity for claims arising out of torts committed by federal employees, see … enforcement officer” applies only to officers enforcing customs or excise laws. Held: Section 2680(c)’s text and structure demonstrate that the broad phrase “any other law … Wilderness Alliance , 542 U. S. 55 , 62-63 (2004) (applying ejusdem generis to conclude that “

Sooraram Pratap Reddy and ors. Vs. District Collector, Ranga Reddy Dis ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Property

Acts : Land Acquisition Act, 1894 - Sections 1, 3, 4 to 17, 17(1), 17(2), 17(4), 18 to 28A, 29 to 30, 31 to 34, 35 to 37, 38 to 44B, 45 to 55; Andhra Pradesh Urban Area Development Act, 1975; Zoning Regulations; Environment (Protection) Act, 1986; Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1923; Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 3; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984; Societies Registration Act, 1860; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950; Bombay Land Requisition Act, 1948; Infrastructure Development Act; Andhra Pradesh Infrastructure Development Enabling Act, 2001; Indian Companies Act, 1913; Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1962 - Sections 40(1); Industries Development and Regulation Act, 1951; Delhi Development Act, 1957; Constitution of Ind

Reported in : 2008(6)ALD19(SC); 2008(4)AWC3875(SC); JT2008(9)SC622; RLW2008(4)SC2794; 2008(12)SCALE367; (2008)9SCC552; 2008(6)Supreme402; (2007) 1 SCC64125

remainder of the development, including the state park. This parcel also includes space reserved for a new U.S. Coast Guard Museum. Parcel 3, which is located immediately north of the Pfizer facility, will contain at least 90,000 square … said orders, the High Court rejected the prayer of the appellants for quashing proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (hereinafter referred to as `the Act') for acquisition of land being illegal, unlawful, mala fide and in … foreign company and few selected persons with vested interest.4. A notification under Section 4 of the Act was published in the State Government Gazette on

Altria Group, Inc. Vs. Good

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

a policy of approval. Cf. Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine , 537 U. S. 51 (2002) (holding that the Coast Guard’s decision not to regulate propeller guards did not impliedly pre-empt petitioner’s tort claims).[ Footnote 14 ] More … in Wolens was the pre-emptive effect of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (ADA), 49 U. S. C. App. §1305(a)(1) (1988 ed.), which prohibits States … and whether “the descriptors convey implied health claims.” 62 Fed. Reg. 48163. In November 2008, following public … 2008 Respondents, smokers of petitioners’ “light” cigarettes, filed suit, alleging that petitioners violated the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act (MUTPA) by fraudulently advertising that their “light” cigarettes delivered less tar and nicotine than regular brands. The District … second purpose. As amended, the Labeling Act contains two express pre-emption provisions. Section 5(a) protects cigarette manufacturers from inconsistent state labeling laws by prohibiting the

Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Adams v. Tanner is as mistaken as would be adherence to Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, overruled by West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish, 300 U. S. 379 (1937). Not only has the philosophy of Adams been abandoned, … to matters of procedure. But in the exercise of this high power, we must be ever on our guard, lest we erect our prejudices into legal principles. If we would guide by the light of reason, we … This was followed by the Act of 1938, the Reform Act of 1978, the Act of 1984, the Act of 1994, a related consumer protection … that Section 29A is not aimed at only persons who have committed acts of malfeasance, but also persons who are otherwise 13 unfit to be … 741 cases were recommended for winding up, and 626 cases were dismissed as not maintainable. These facts