Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coast guard act 1978 section 51 · Page 1 of about 9 results (0.038 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 05 2008

Md. Abbas Mohideen Vs. Government of India Rep. by Secretary to Govern ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-05-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Coast Guard Act, 1978 - Sections 16, 42, 51, 51(1), 51(1A), 53(1), 61(4), 66 and 119; Coast Guard (Amendment) Act, 2002; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2); Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983 - Rules 26, 63, 64 and 65

Reported in : (2008)IILLJ587Mad

water leading to deterioration of material state of starboard D.A thereby committed an offence under Section 16 of Coast Guard Act, 1978.b. Knowingly concealed the vital information of sea water ingress in star board D.A from his Commanding Officer, administrative … is excluded, then there was no delay at all.21. In this context, it is relevant to refer to Section 51(1) of the Coast Guard Act, which reads as follows:51.(1) No person unless he is an offender who has

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2010

Sk.Singh .. Vs. the Director General, Coast Guard Headquarters, and or ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-09-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

respondent, for a judicial review of the trial proceedings in accordance with sections 117 and 118 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978. The judicial proceedings were conducted by the Chief Law Officer on 9th September, 2002 at the Coast Guard … of 13 contained in the charge sheet and awarded the sentence of dismissal from service, as provided under section 53 of the Coast Guard Act, by its order dated 5th June, 2002. The copies of the coast … and 21 of the Constitution of India. That apart, as per section 51(1) of the Coast Guard Act, no person shall be tried or punished

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2003

Md. Abbas Mohidden Vs. the Director General, Coast Guard and anr.

Court : Orissa

Decided on : Mar-05-2003

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Coast Guard Act, 1978 - Sections 66(3)(4), 117 and 119

Reported in : 95(2003)CLT593

decided to dissolve the said Coast Guard Court in exercise of the powers under Section 66(3) of the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). It is also stated that the Director General of Coast Guard did … learned counsel also submits that the instant proceeding is barred by limitation in view of provisions contained in Section 51 of the Act. The learned Counsel in support of his contention with regard to mala fide, further submitted

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 22 2020

T.J. Joseph vs the Director General, Coast Guard Headquarters

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-22-2020

LATE K.K DANDAPANI, AGED 55 YEARS, PALLATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, PANJIKKARA, MULAVUKADU P.O, COCHIN 682 504(WORKING AS SARANG LASCAR)HEAD QUARTERS, COAST GUARD DISTRICT NO. 4,KOCHI 4 2 D.WINSTON S/O. LATE DENNISON, AGED 55 YEARS,MALIKKAL HOUSE, MUNDAMVELI P.O, COCHIN 682 507(WORKING … the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978 (for short, 'STCWC'), to contend that, personnel without the requisite qualifications and … on for re-fuelling duties in and around Kavaratti port, representations were submitted requesting to desist from such illegal action. The representations having evoked no response, the writ petitions were filed, contending that, competency of the appellants as … have to first look at therelevant provisions of the Merchant Shipping Act. Section 2 of the Act makes its provisions applicable to any vessel which … learned counsel for the appellants contended that Article 51(c) of the Constitution of India, makes it obligatory

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2020

K.D.Devarajan vs the Director General

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-22-2020

LATE K.K DANDAPANI, AGED 55 YEARS, PALLATHUPARAMBIL HOUSE, PANJIKKARA, MULAVUKADU P.O, COCHIN 682 504(WORKING AS SARANG LASCAR)HEAD QUARTERS, COAST GUARD DISTRICT NO. 4,KOCHI 4 2 D.WINSTON S/O. LATE DENNISON, AGED 55 YEARS,MALIKKAL HOUSE, MUNDAMVELI P.O, COCHIN 682 507(WORKING … the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978 (for short, 'STCWC'), to contend that, personnel without the requisite qualifications and … on for re-fuelling duties in and around Kavaratti port, representations were submitted requesting to desist from such illegal action. The representations having evoked no response, the writ petitions were filed, contending that, competency of the appellants as … have to first look at therelevant provisions of the Merchant Shipping Act. Section 2 of the Act makes its provisions applicable to any vessel which … learned counsel for the appellants contended that Article 51(c) of the Constitution of India, makes it obligatory

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 18 1986

Sri Mulchand Phoolchand JaIn Vs. Collector of Customs (P)

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-18-1986

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : (1987)(13)LC101Tri(Mum.)bai

finding that all the 89 silver ingots in question were brought to Kamathipura which is near the sea coast of India and were attempted to be smuggled out of India in contravention of the provisions of Section … and he was merely a custodian. Neither Shri Lokhandwalla nor his servants who were alleged to be on guard duty, disclosed either at the time of seizure or subsequent to it, that the silver ingots were belonging … The terms of the consent memo are: 1. Order dated 7th June, 1978 (a copy whereof is Exhibit 'G' to the Petition) set aside. Revision … produced bills from Bombay Bullion Merchants Association for 51 silver ingots and gave particulars of the four … officers of the Marine and Preventive Division, Bombay on 19.11.1966 for taking action under the Customs law. After a month thereafter, the appellant Mulchand P.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 25 2007

National Assn. of Home Builders Vs. Defenders of Wildlife

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-25-2007

Subject : Land Acquisition

Army acting through the Chief of Engineers, after consultation with the Secretary of the department in which the Coast Guard is operating, anchorage and navigation of any of the navigable waters would be substantially impaired thereby; “(7) To … resolving any conflicts between the ESA and a proposed agency action. In 1978, shortly after our decision in Hill , Congress amended the ESA to … appeals for the ninth circuit No. 06-340. Argued April 17, 2007-Decided June 25, 2007 Under the Clean Water Act (CWA), petitioner Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) initially administers each State’s National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitting program, … application and a showing that the State has met nine specified criteria. Section 7(a)(2) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) requires federal agencies … Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore. , 515 U. S. 687 , 703. Deference is not

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 26 1991

Eeoc Vs. Arabian American Oil Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-26-1991

Subject : Land Acquisition

permanent foreign establishment) of any domestic concern which is controlled in fact by such domestic concern") § 2415(2); Coast Guard Act, 14 U.S.C. § 89(a) (Coast Guard searches and seizures upon the high seas); 18 U.S.C. § 7 (Criminal … extraterritorial application of the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. FELA provides that common carriers by railroad, while engaging in … corporation whose place of incorporation is in a foreign country, any practice by such corporation prohibited under this section shall be presumed to be such practice by such employer." 29 U.S.C. § 623(h)(1). The expressed purpose of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 15 2008

Altria Group, Inc. Vs. Good

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Dec-15-2008

Subject : MRTP

a policy of approval. Cf. Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine , 537 U. S. 51 (2002) (holding that the Coast Guard’s decision not to regulate propeller guards did not impliedly pre-empt petitioner’s tort claims).[ Footnote 14 ] More … in Wolens was the pre-emptive effect of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (ADA), 49 U. S. C. App. §1305(a)(1) (1988 ed.), which prohibits States … 2008 Respondents, smokers of petitioners’ “light” cigarettes, filed suit, alleging that petitioners violated the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act (MUTPA) by fraudulently advertising that their “light” cigarettes delivered less tar and nicotine than regular brands. The District … second purpose. As amended, the Labeling Act contains two express pre-emption provisions. Section 5(a) protects cigarette manufacturers from inconsistent state labeling laws by prohibiting the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Next ›

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial