Advanced Search Results

Sk.Singh .. Vs. the Director General, Coast Guard Headquarters, and or ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

respondent, for a judicial review of the trial proceedings in accordance with sections 117 and 118 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978. The judicial proceedings were conducted by the Chief Law Officer on 9th September, 2002 at the Coast Guard … contained in the charge sheet, which was prepared in accordance with Rule 45 of the Coast Guard (Discipline) Rues, 1983. The 1st respondent, on being … of 13 contained in the charge sheet and awarded the sentence of dismissal from service, as provided under section 53 of the Coast Guard Act, by its order dated 5th June, 2002. The copies of the coast

S. Chaoba Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; Constitution of India (47th Amendment) Act, 1976; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 19 and 25

1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 1968), the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (30 of 1978), and the National Security Guard Act, 1986 (47 of 1986).(2) For the removal of doubts, … is charged with :-BSF Act Abetment of commissions of an offence by a public servant Sec. 46 under Section 7 punishable under Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.In that, they while on OP duty at

Commodore Narinder M. Pandit S/O Late Munshi Ram Arjundas Pandit Vs. t ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 2004(4)BomCR814; (2004)106BOMLR98

1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), The Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of 11968), the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (30 of 1978), and the National Security Guard Act, 1986 (47 of 1986).(2) For the removal of doubts, … of the petitioners were overruled and the Court Martial proceeded further. The petitioner was arraigned in terms of Section 106 of the Navy Act and the petitioner pleaded not guilty to all the charges.4. The contentions raised

Dr Baliram Waman Hiray Vs. Justice B. LentIn and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5(4), 5(5) and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3) and 346; Constitution of India - Article 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 23; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 18; Indian Railways Act - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR1988SC2267; (1988)90BOMLR434; 1988(3)Crimes655(SC); [1989]176ITR1(SC); JT1988(4)SC265; 1988(2)SCALE688; (1988)4SCC419; [1988]Supp2SCR942; [1989]72STC384(SC)

Act, 1985, Section 19 of the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983 and Section 95 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978, deeming the Commissioner or the Tribunal appointed under the respective Acts for investigation of claims to be a … a judicial proceeding within the meaning of Sections 193 to 228 of the Indian Penal Code (Act No. XLV of 1860). In Chandrapal Singh and Ors. v. Maharaj Singh and Anr. : 1982CriLJ1731 , a 3-Judges Bench

Edmond Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES No. 96-262. Argued February 24, 1997-Decided May 19, 1997* The Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals (formerly the Coast Guard Court of Military Review) hears appeals from the decisions of … independent counsel created by provisions of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 28 U. S. C. §§ 591-599, was an inferior officer. In reaching … 501 U. S. 868 , distinguished. Pp. 658-666. 45 M. J. 19 (first judgment), 44 M. J. … Lotz. 653 Malcolm L. Stewart argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Dellinger, Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben, Douglas N. Letter, Nancy E. McFadden, Paul M. Geier, Peter J. … superior 658 officer." Id., at 172. We found it significant that the sections of the UCMJ relating to military judges "speak explicitly and exclusively in

Ex Uttam Navik Shelender Singh vs Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 17.09.2016 at the Headquarters of ICGS, Haldia. f. Thereafter, charges were framed under Section 22(a) of the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) against the Petitioners for pushing and punching Executive Officer Himanshu Shekhar and … record indicates that separate petitions were filed under Section 119 of the Act read with Rules 44 and 45 of the Coast GuardSigned By:RAHUL W.P.(C) 6449/2017 etc. Page 4 of 14(General) Rules, 1986 to the Direct General,

Sandeep Yadav vs Director General of Indian Coast

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

on 17.09.2016 at the Headquarters of ICGS, Haldia. f. Thereafter, charges were framed under Section 22(a) of the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) against the Petitioners for pushing and punching Executive Officer Himanshu Shekhar and … record indicates that separate petitions were filed under Section 119 of the Act read with Rules 44 and 45 of the Coast GuardSigned By:RAHUL W.P.(C) 6449/2017 etc. Page 4 of 14(General) Rules, 1986 to the Direct General,

Capt. Parveen Rawat and ors. Vs. State of J and K and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Ranbir Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 120B, 409, 420 and 467; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 52F and 69; ;Army (Amendment) Act, 1987; ;Army Regulations; ;Navy Act; ;Air Force Act - Section 176; ;Army Courts and Criminal Courts Rules; ;Court-martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rule 3, 4, 5 and 6; ;Criminal Procedusre Code , Svt. 1989 - Sections 1, 1(2), 5, 5(1), 5(2), 167, 428, 475, 549 and 561A; ;Constitution of India - Article 20; ;Army Rules

been framed. Under Rule 3 it is provided that where a person subject to military, naval.air force or coast guard law or any other law relating to the Armed Forces of the Union for the time being in … Criminal Courts, Rules called Criminal Court and Court-martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules 1978 have been framed. Under Rule 3 it is provided that where a … for commission of offence Under Section 52F and 45 of Army Act whereas petitioner No. 4 for … of officers for checking the products in the trucks. The police after registering the FIRs also swung into action and seized the trucks/tankers. The drivers of the trucks/tankers were arrested, since they were found to be carrying … are seeking to invoke the inherent jurisdiction of this Court vested Under Section 561-A Cr.P.C. for quashing FIR Nos. 75 and 103/2005 registered at Police

Block Vs. Neal

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

States, 350 U. S. 61 (1955) (Coast Guard's failure to maintain the beacon light in a lighthouse); Seaboard Coast Line R. Co. v. United States, 473 F.2d 714 (CA5 1973) (negligent design and construction of a drainage … the heat pump unit was either defective or undersized. On March 22, 1978, FmHA's State Director and other FmHA officials conducted a complete inspection and … TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT Syllabus In her complaint in the later-described action, respondent asserted the following facts. She obtained a loan from the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) under the Housing … essence a negligent misrepresentation, Neustadt's action was barred under the "misrepresentation" exception. Section 2680(h) thus relieves the Government of tort liability for pecuniary injuries which … Court's decision in Neustadt. We granted the writ, 456 U.S. 988 (1982), and we now affirm. II

Eeoc Vs. Arabian American Oil Co.

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

permanent foreign establishment) of any domestic concern which is controlled in fact by such domestic concern") § 2415(2); Coast Guard Act, 14 U.S.C. § 89(a) (Coast Guard searches and seizures upon the high seas); 18 U.S.C. § 7 (Criminal … we addressed the extraterritorial application of the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA), 45 U.S.C. § 51 et seq. FELA provides that common carriers by railroad, … corporation whose place of incorporation is in a foreign country, any practice by such corporation prohibited under this section shall be presumed to be such practice by such employer." 29 U.S.C. § 623(h)(1). The expressed purpose of