Advanced Search Results

Hi-tech Engineers Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28, 72, 88, 88A, 90 and 124

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR776

Guard is an armed force of the Union, under the Ministry of Defence, and is governed by the Coast Guard Act, 1978.7. Mr. Nankani, however, strongly urged that on realising the mistake committed by the petitioners in obtaining clearance … and they are firstly, whether the petitioners who fraudulently obtained duty free clearance of imported Dracone Barges under section 90 of the Customs Act, 1962 can file an application before the Settlement Commission and contend that even

Union of India, Secretary to the Ministry of Defence, New Delhi and Ot ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

an agreement to be a sub-contractor to the salvage, which is clear from his representation Ext.P8. 35. The Coast Guard Act, 1978 was enacted for constitution and regulations of armed forces of the union for ensuring the security of maritime … dated 3.8.1999 rejected the statutory representation submitted by the petitioner. It was observed in the order that, under Section 14 of the Coast Guard Act, it is one of the primary duties of the Coast Guard to

Hi-tech Engineers Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 72 and 90

Reported in : 2003(161)ELT96(Bom)

Guard is an armed force of the Union, under the Ministry of Defence, and is governed by the Coast Guard Act, 1978.7. Mr. Nankani, however, strongly urged that on realising the mistake committed by the petitioners in obtaining clearance … and they are, firstly, whether the Petitioners who fraudulently obtained duty free clearance of imported Dracone Barges under Section 90 of the Customs Act, 1962 can file an application, before the Settlement Commission and contend that even

Smt. Hawabi Sayed Arif Sayed Hanif Vs. L. Hmingliana and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 3, 8 and 9; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Sections 3(3) and 10(1)

Reported in : AIR1993SC810; 1993(1)ALT(Cri)521; 1993(41)BLJR248; 1993CriLJ172; 1992(3)Crimes635(SC); 1993(42)ECC12; JT1992(6)SC162; 1992(2)SCALE796; (1993)1SCC163

collected by the officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, a surveillance was maintained by the officers on Coast Guard vessel O.G. 'VIGRAH' in the sea off Karwar for a suspect Arab Dhow carrying foreign silver to smuggle … Customs Act, 1962 (as substituted for certain words by Act 25 of 1978) which defines Indian Customs Waters as waters extending into sea up to … conferred on him under Sub-section (1) Section 3 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') with a view to preventing him from smuggling of goods.3.

Office Of The Odisha Lokayukta Vs. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Election

other authority under the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Coast Guard Act, 1978 or the procedure is applicable to such public servant under those Acts; 10 …….”.18. Chapter VII prescribes the … passed by the Odisha Lokayukta initiating to conduct a preliminary 1 inquiry in exercise of power conferred under Section 20(1) of the Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014(hereinafter being referred to as the “Act 2014”) on a complaint dated

Ex.Uttam Navik Dalbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

(O.O.D). The petitioner’scontention is that the very act of admonishing an employee is a punishment prescribed under the Coast Guard Act, 1978 which fact was also admitted by the OOD as well in his statement during the enquiry. 4. The … Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983. The charges framed against the petitioner were as under:- “(i) FIRST CHARGE: Under Section 19 (a) of Coast Guard Act, 1978:- USING CRIMINAL FORCE TO HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER. In that he, did, … the punishment and quashed the dismissal of the petitioner from the service. 35. It is settled law that it is not the function of the

California State Lands Comm'n Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

] Since that time, the land has been continuously possessed by the United States and used as a Coast Guard Reservation. The Pacific shoreline along the Coast Guard site remained subtantially unchanged until near the turn of the … 284 U. S. 545 -546 (1932). [ Footnote 5 ] In May, 1978, California transmitted a proposed permit to the United States to allow construction … deciding the substantive legal issue. Congress addressed the issue of accretions to federal land in the Submerged Lands Act, which vested title in the States to the lands underlying the territorial sea and confirmed the title of … belong to the upland owner. Pp. 457 U. S. 285 -286. (d) Section 2(a)(3) of the Submerged Lands Act, defining "lands beneath navigable waters" that … S. 189 -193 (1890); Beaver v. United States, 350 F.2d 4, 10-11 (CA9 1965). [ Footnote 7

United States Vs. Albertini

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

the statute, which provides: "Whoever, within the jurisdiction of the United States, goes upon any military, naval, or Coast Guard Reservation, post, fort, arsenal, yard, station, or installation, for any purpose prohibited by law or lawful regulation; or" … 449 U.S. 984 (1980); United States v. Douglass, 579 F.2d 545 (CA9 1978) (16 days after bar letter, 1 day after verbal order not to … of Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 321, § 45, 35 Stat. 1097. Both the War Department and the … race, but respondent only took photographs of the displays at the open house, and did not disrupt the activities there. The commanding officer directed the chief of the security police to have the individuals cease their demonstration, … the base had been transformed into a temporary public forum. Held: 1. Section 1382 applies to respondent's conduct. Viewed in light of the ordinary meaning

ScIndia Steam Nav. Co., Ltd. Vs. Santos

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : Land Acquisition

but not the duty, to repair. Tr. of Oral Arg. 10. [ Footnote 25 ] The United States Coast Guard has issued regulations with respect to the gear and equipment of cargo ships. 46 CFR Ch. 1, Subchapter … suits. See, e.g., Canizzo v. Farrell Lines, Inc., 579 F.2d 682 (CA2 1978); Gay v. Ocean Transport & Trading, Ltd., 546 F.2d 1233 (CA5 1977); … the winch. Respondent longshoreman brought suit against petitioner under the provision of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act as amended in 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 905(b), which states that a longshoreman injured "by the negligence of … such vessel as a third party in accordance with the provisions of section 933 of this title, and the employer shall not be liable to … manner. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic S.S. Corp., 350 U. S. 124 (1956). [ Footnote 12 ]

Altria Group, Inc. Vs. Good

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

a policy of approval. Cf. Sprietsma v. Mercury Marine , 537 U. S. 51 (2002) (holding that the Coast Guard’s decision not to regulate propeller guards did not impliedly pre-empt petitioner’s tort claims).[ Footnote 14 ] More … in Wolens was the pre-emptive effect of the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978 (ADA), 49 U. S. C. App. §1305(a)(1) (1988 ed.), which prohibits States … yields as measured by Cambridge Filter Method testing. 35 Fed. Reg. 12671. The leading cigarette manufacturers responded … 2008 Respondents, smokers of petitioners’ “light” cigarettes, filed suit, alleging that petitioners violated the Maine Unfair Trade Practices Act (MUTPA) by fraudulently advertising that their “light” cigarettes delivered less tar and nicotine than regular brands. The District … second purpose. As amended, the Labeling Act contains two express pre-emption provisions. Section 5(a) protects cigarette manufacturers from inconsistent state labeling laws by prohibiting the