Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coast guard act 1978 section 33 · Page 1 of about 16 results (0.033 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 21 2012

Ex.Uttam Navik Dalbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-21-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

(O.O.D). The petitioner’scontention is that the very act of admonishing an employee is a punishment prescribed under the Coast Guard Act, 1978 which fact was also admitted by the OOD as well in his statement during the enquiry. 4. The … Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983. The charges framed against the petitioner were as under:- “(i) FIRST CHARGE: Under Section 19 (a) of Coast Guard Act, 1978:- USING CRIMINAL FORCE TO HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER. In that he, did, … it took around two hours to travel from his residence to Vajra. 33. The next point for consideration is whether the misconduct of the petitioner

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2011

Commandant Shamsher Singh Malik Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-19-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Coast Guard Act 1978 - Section 123(1); Coast Guard (Seniority and Promotion) Rules 1987 - Rule 7

1. With the promulgation of the Coast Guard Act 1978, a cadre of Coast Guards was created by hiving off a wing of the Indian Navy. A distinct … Service and earned promotion in the year 1993 as Commandant. 4. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 123(1) of the Coast Guard Act 1978, the Central Government framed the Coast Guard (Seniority and Promotion) Rules … 3 SCC 157, A.A. Calton v Director of Education 1983 (3) SCC 33, State of Rajasthan v R. Dayal (1997) 10 SCC 419 and B.L.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2016

Union of India, Secretary to the Ministry of Defence, New Delhi and Ot ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-22-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

an agreement to be a sub-contractor to the salvage, which is clear from his representation Ext.P8. 35. The Coast Guard Act, 1978 was enacted for constitution and regulations of armed forces of the union for ensuring the security of maritime … dated 3.8.1999 rejected the statutory representation submitted by the petitioner. It was observed in the order that, under Section 14 of the Coast Guard Act, it is one of the primary duties of the Coast Guard to … vessel seconded thereto or operating under its aegis) at any material time; 33. As noted above, petitioner's claim being not covered under Section 402, he

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 18 1985

Herb's Welding, Inc. Vs. Gray

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-18-1985

Subject : Land Acquisition

several emphatically nonmaritime locales. Undeterred, the dissent points out that Congress left regulation of offshore platforms to the Coast Guard. Yet one would not have expected otherwise, since geographically the platforms fall within the Coast Guard's jurisdiction. No … consistent with this opinion. It is so ordered. [ Footnote 1 ] Section 2(3) of the Act, 86 Stat. 1251, 33 U.S.C. § 902(3), provides: … TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Syllabus The Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA), as amended in 1972, provides compensation for the death or disability of any person engaged in "maritime

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 23 2023

Office Of The Odisha Lokayukta Vs. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-23-2023

Subject : Election

other authority under the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Coast Guard Act, 1978 or the procedure is applicable to such public servant under those Acts; 10 …….”.18. Chapter VII prescribes the … passed by the Odisha Lokayukta initiating to conduct a preliminary 1 inquiry in exercise of power conferred under Section 20(1) of the Odisha Lokayukta Act, 2014(hereinafter being referred to as the “Act 2014”) on a complaint dated

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2000

United States Vs. Locke

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-06-2000

Subject : Land Acquisition

to maritime tanker transports. These include the PWSA, Title I of which authorizes, but does not require, the Coast Guard to enact measures for controlling vessel traffic or for protecting navigation and the marine environment, 33 U. S. … spilled crude oil off the coast of England in 1967, both Congress, in the Ports and Waterways Safety Act of 1972 (PWSA), and the State of Washington enacted more stringent regulations for tankers and provided for more … The Act, as amended by the Port and Tanker Safety Act of 1978, 92 Stat. 1471, contains two somewhat overlapping titles, both of which may, … of March 3, 1851 (46 U. S. C. 183 et seq.), or section 9509 of [the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U. S. C.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 27 1980

United States Vs. Ward

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-27-1980

Subject : Service Tax

Arkansas River system, respondent notified the Environmental Protection Agency of the discharge, and this was reported to the Coast Guard, who assessed a $500 penalty against respondent under § 311(b)(6). After his administrative appeal was denied, respondent filed … 91 Stat. 1566, and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1978, Pub.L. 95-576, 92 Stat. 2468. Except as noted, those amendments have no … case, except a prosecution for perjury or for giving a false statement." 33 U.S.C. § 1321(b)(5). [ Footnote 3 ] Page 448 U. S. 245 … UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Syllabus Section 311(b)(3) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act prohibits the discharge of oil into navigable waters. Section 311(b)(5) requires any person in charge of an onshore

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1992

Smt. Hawabi Sayed Arif Sayed Hanif Vs. L. Hmingliana and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-14-1992

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 3, 8 and 9; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Sections 3(3) and 10(1)

Reported in : AIR1993SC810; 1993(1)ALT(Cri)521; 1993(41)BLJR248; 1993CriLJ172; 1992(3)Crimes635(SC); 1993(42)ECC12; JT1992(6)SC162; 1992(2)SCALE796; (1993)1SCC163

collected by the officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, a surveillance was maintained by the officers on Coast Guard vessel O.G. 'VIGRAH' in the sea off Karwar for a suspect Arab Dhow carrying foreign silver to smuggle … Customs Act, 1962 (as substituted for certain words by Act 25 of 1978) which defines Indian Customs Waters as waters extending into sea up to … conferred on him under Sub-section (1) Section 3 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') with a view to preventing him from smuggling of goods.3.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 2008

Ali Vs. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-22-2008

Subject : Land Acquisition

laws, not the customs or excise laws. Similarly, the dissent notes that 14 U. S. C. §89(a) authorizes Coast Guard officers to enforce customs laws. Post , at 5-6. But the very next subsection of §89 provides that … Secret Serv. Dept. of Treasury , 593 F. 2d 849, 851 (CA9 1978) (Tang, J., concurring) (“The clauses both dwell exclusively on customs and taxes, … appeals for the eleventh circuit No. 06-9130. Argued October 29, 2007-Decided January 22, 2008 The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) waives the United States’ sovereign immunity for claims arising out of torts committed by federal employees, see … enforcement officer” applies only to officers enforcing customs or excise laws. Held: Section 2680(c)’s text and structure demonstrate that the broad phrase “any other law … v. Shell Oil Co. , 519 U. S. 337 , 340 (1997) (citing United States v. Ron

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 21 1981

ScIndia Steam Nav. Co., Ltd. Vs. Santos

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Apr-21-1981

Subject : Land Acquisition

but not the duty, to repair. Tr. of Oral Arg. 10. [ Footnote 25 ] The United States Coast Guard has issued regulations with respect to the gear and equipment of cargo ships. 46 CFR Ch. 1, Subchapter … the winch. Respondent longshoreman brought suit against petitioner under the provision of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act as amended in 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 905(b), which states that a longshoreman injured "by the negligence of … suits. See, e.g., Canizzo v. Farrell Lines, Inc., 579 F.2d 682 (CA2 1978); Gay v. Ocean Transport & Trading, Ltd., 546 F.2d 1233 (CA5 1977); … such vessel as a third party in accordance with the provisions of section 933 of this title, and the employer shall not be liable to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial