Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coast guard act 1978 section 32 · Page 1 of about 20 results (0.037 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Feb 23 2023

Office Of The Odisha Lokayukta Vs. Pradeep Kumar Panigrahi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Feb-23-2023

Subject : Election

other authority under the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Coast Guard Act, 1978 or the procedure is applicable to such public servant under those Acts; 10 …….”.18. Chapter VII prescribes the … shall not be affected until the public servant is put under suspension on recommendation of the Lokayukta under section 32 or charge sheet is filed after completion of investigation under clause (a) of sub­section (3) or a charge

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2012

Ex.Uttam Navik Dalbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-21-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

(O.O.D). The petitioner’scontention is that the very act of admonishing an employee is a punishment prescribed under the Coast Guard Act, 1978 which fact was also admitted by the OOD as well in his statement during the enquiry. 4. The … Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983. The charges framed against the petitioner were as under:- “(i) FIRST CHARGE: Under Section 19 (a) of Coast Guard Act, 1978:- USING CRIMINAL FORCE TO HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER. In that he, did, … petitioner in this regard is to be repelled and cannot be accepted. 32. It is not denied that the petitioner was well aware of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2016

Union of India, Secretary to the Ministry of Defence, New Delhi and Ot ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-22-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

an agreement to be a sub-contractor to the salvage, which is clear from his representation Ext.P8. 35. The Coast Guard Act, 1978 was enacted for constitution and regulations of armed forces of the union for ensuring the security of maritime … dated 3.8.1999 rejected the statutory representation submitted by the petitioner. It was observed in the order that, under Section 14 of the Coast Guard Act, it is one of the primary duties of the Coast Guard to … tug of M/s.Wijsmuller to Dubai. The salvage operations were terminated on 26.10.1996. 32. From the above, it is clear that salvage operations undertaken by CGS

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 07 2004

D.S. Ahluwalia Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on : May-07-2004

Subject : ConstitutionService

Acts : Consittution of India - Articles 14, 16, 26 and 39

Reported in : 2004(2)JKJ503

of the State/Central Government, is essential. On the other hand, in the Coast Guard, Section 115 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978, which regulates the appointments of Chief Law Officer and other Law Officers, provides an experience of 10 years

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 09 2010

Sk.Singh .. Vs. the Director General, Coast Guard Headquarters, and or ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jun-09-2010

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

respondent, for a judicial review of the trial proceedings in accordance with sections 117 and 118 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978. The judicial proceedings were conducted by the Chief Law Officer on 9th September, 2002 at the Coast Guard … of 13 contained in the charge sheet and awarded the sentence of dismissal from service, as provided under section 53 of the Coast Guard Act, by its order dated 5th June, 2002. The copies of the coast … in the case of KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LTD., ..vs.. K.THANGAPPAN (2006(4) SCC 322), UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS ..vs.. MAJOR A.HUSSAIN (1998) 1 SCC 537),

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 18 1982

California State Lands Comm'n Vs. United States

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-18-1982

Subject : Land Acquisition

] Since that time, the land has been continuously possessed by the United States and used as a Coast Guard Reservation. The Pacific shoreline along the Coast Guard site remained subtantially unchanged until near the turn of the … 284 U. S. 545 -546 (1932). [ Footnote 5 ] In May, 1978, California transmitted a proposed permit to the United States to allow construction … deciding the substantive legal issue. Congress addressed the issue of accretions to federal land in the Submerged Lands Act, which vested title in the States to the lands underlying the territorial sea and confirmed the title of … belong to the upland owner. Pp. 457 U. S. 285 -286. (d) Section 2(a)(3) of the Submerged Lands Act, defining "lands beneath navigable waters" that … local law. Barney v. Keokuk, 94 U. S. 324 , 94 U. S. 338 ; Shively v.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 1986

Joseph Antony Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-09-1986

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kerala Marine Fishing Regulation Act, 1981 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Article 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : AIR1986Ker238

Government is manifestly unreasonable and amounts to an abuse of the statutory power vested in them.30. The Coast Guards Act, 1978 was enacted by the Parliament precisely for enforcing law and order in our territorial and other … is manifestly unreasonable and amounts to an abuse of the statutory power vested in them.30. The Coast Guards Act, 1978 was enacted by the Parliament precisely for enforcing law and order in our territorial and other waters. It … as against Exts. P1 and P2. Ext. P3 specifying the area under Section 2(h) of the Kerala Marine Fishing Regulation Act, 1980 (Act 10 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 06 2000

United States Vs. Locke

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Mar-06-2000

Subject : Land Acquisition

to maritime tanker transports. These include the PWSA, Title I of which authorizes, but does not require, the Coast Guard to enact measures for controlling vessel traffic or for protecting navigation and the marine environment, 33 U. S. … spilled crude oil off the coast of England in 1967, both Congress, in the Ports and Waterways Safety Act of 1972 (PWSA), and the State of Washington enacted more stringent regulations for tankers and provided for more … The Act, as amended by the Port and Tanker Safety Act of 1978, 92 Stat. 1471, contains two somewhat overlapping titles, both of which may, … Management System for the Juan de Fuca Region, 32 U. S. T. 377, T. 1. A. S. … of March 3, 1851 (46 U. S. C. 183 et seq.), or section 9509 of [the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U. S. C.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 21 2013

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Th:cbi Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-21-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

organized the landing of fire arms and ammunitions and hand grenades which was to take place on the coast of Dighi Jetty in Raigad District of State of Maharashtra on 09.01.1993. On the said date, Md. Dossa … and seized a single 3.62 mm pistol with magazine as well as 32 cartridges. (ag) On 05.04.1993, at the instance of Shaikh Aziz (A-21), Vijay … and sentence passed on various dates by the Presiding Officer of the Designated Court under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (in short ‘the TADA’) for Bombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No.1 of … Bombay in BBC No.1 of 1993. These appeals have been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against their conviction and sentence

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 17 1983

United States Vs. Villamonte-marquez

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-17-1983

Subject : Land Acquisition

et seq. (1976 ed., Supp. V). Many of these vessels must also submit to periodic inspection by the Coast Guard and a "certificate of inspection" must be kept on the vessel at all times. 46 U.S.C. §§ 399, … hypothetical civil analogy, a judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32 was entered on the jury verdict of guilty. At this juncture, for … Amendment because the boarding occurred in the absence of "a reasonable suspicion of a law violation." Held: The action of the customs officers in boarding the sailboat pursuant to § 1581(a) was "reasonable," and was therefore consistent … of ships or vessels." Act of Aug. 4, 1790, 1 Stat. 145. Section 31 of that Act provided in pertinent part as follows: "That it

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial