Advanced Search Results

Md. Abbas Mohidden Vs. the Director General, Coast Guard and anr.

Court : Orissa

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Coast Guard Act, 1978 - Sections 66(3)(4), 117 and 119

Reported in : 95(2003)CLT593

decided to dissolve the said Coast Guard Court in exercise of the powers under Section 66(3) of the Coast Guard Act, 1978 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). It is also stated that the Director General of Coast Guard did

Union of India, Secretary to the Ministry of Defence, New Delhi and Ot ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

an agreement to be a sub-contractor to the salvage, which is clear from his representation Ext.P8. 35. The Coast Guard Act, 1978 was enacted for constitution and regulations of armed forces of the union for ensuring the security of maritime … India . The reference to salvage operations by a Coast Guard or Naval Ships contained in sub - section (3) of Section 402 relates to cases where such operations are undertaken in the territorial waters and finally the

Sk.Singh .. Vs. the Director General, Coast Guard Headquarters, and or ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

respondent, for a judicial review of the trial proceedings in accordance with sections 117 and 118 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978. The judicial proceedings were conducted by the Chief Law Officer on 9th September, 2002 at the Coast Guard … of 13 contained in the charge sheet and awarded the sentence of dismissal from service, as provided under section 53 of the Coast Guard Act, by its order dated 5th June, 2002. The copies of the coast … 1. Challenging the order of dismissal from service passed by the 3rd respondent dated 05.06.2002, which has been confirmed by the 1st respondent by

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Th:cbi Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

organized the landing of fire arms and ammunitions and hand grenades which was to take place on the coast of Dighi Jetty in Raigad District of State of Maharashtra on 09.01.1993. On the said date, Md. Dossa … and caused explosions at Fishermen’s colony at Mahim at 14:45 hrs. wherein 3 persons were killed and 6 persons were injured; Sixthly, Mohammed Farooq Mohammed … and sentence passed on various dates by the Presiding Officer of the Designated Court under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (in short ‘the TADA’) for Bombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No.1 of … Bombay in BBC No.1 of 1993. These appeals have been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against their conviction and sentence

Md. Abbas Mohideen Vs. Government of India Rep. by Secretary to Govern ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Coast Guard Act, 1978 - Sections 16, 42, 51, 51(1), 51(1A), 53(1), 61(4), 66 and 119; Coast Guard (Amendment) Act, 2002; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2); Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983 - Rules 26, 63, 64 and 65

Reported in : (2008)IILLJ587Mad

water leading to deterioration of material state of starboard D.A thereby committed an offence under Section 16 of Coast Guard Act, 1978.b. Knowingly concealed the vital information of sea water ingress in star board D.A from his Commanding Officer, administrative … not furnished to him. The petitioner instituted certain proceedings before the Orissa High Court. During these proceedings, on 31.10.1995, the Departmental promotion Committee [DPC for short] was convened to consider the issue of promotion to the post

Hi-tech Engineers Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 72 and 90

Reported in : 2003(161)ELT96(Bom)

Guard is an armed force of the Union, under the Ministry of Defence, and is governed by the Coast Guard Act, 1978.7. Mr. Nankani, however, strongly urged that on realising the mistake committed by the petitioners in obtaining clearance … in respect of the goods (other than barges) mentioned at Serial No. 3 of Annexure to the Show Cause Notice dated 19th December, 1997. On … and they are, firstly, whether the Petitioners who fraudulently obtained duty free clearance of imported Dracone Barges under Section 90 of the Customs Act, 1962 can file an application, before the Settlement Commission and contend that even

S. Rajesh Vs. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Salem and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

there was no permission granted to him even to participate. All Coast Guard Personnel are governed by the Coast Guard Act, 1978 and the Rules framed thereunder. As per Section 9 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978, resignation is not … of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the order in No.231/2, dated 6.4.2015 of the 3rd Respondent and to quash the same and to direct the Respondents 3 and 4 to relieve the Petitioner

Hi-tech Engineers Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28, 72, 88, 88A, 90 and 124

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR776

Guard is an armed force of the Union, under the Ministry of Defence, and is governed by the Coast Guard Act, 1978.7. Mr. Nankani, however, strongly urged that on realising the mistake committed by the petitioners in obtaining clearance … in respect of the goods (other than barges) mentioned at Serial No. 3 of Annexure to the show cause notice dated 19th December, 1997. On … and they are firstly, whether the petitioners who fraudulently obtained duty free clearance of imported Dracone Barges under section 90 of the Customs Act, 1962 can file an application before the Settlement Commission and contend that even

Union of India Rep. By the Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Vs. Ranj ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Act, 1950; the Air Force Act, 1950; the Navy Act, 1957; the Border Security Force Act, 1968; the Coast Guard Act, 1978 and the National Security Guard Act, 1986 are the statutes included in Section 25 of the PC Act. … only by a special Judge. A special Judge under the Act is appointed by a notification issued under Section 3 of the PC Act either by the Central Government or the State Government. According to the Section 5

Dr Baliram Waman Hiray Vs. Justice B. LentIn and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5(4), 5(5) and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3) and 346; Constitution of India - Article 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 23; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 18; Indian Railways Act - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR1988SC2267; (1988)90BOMLR434; 1988(3)Crimes655(SC); [1989]176ITR1(SC); JT1988(4)SC265; 1988(2)SCALE688; (1988)4SCC419; [1988]Supp2SCR942; [1989]72STC384(SC)

Act, 1985, Section 19 of the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983 and Section 95 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978, deeming the Commissioner or the Tribunal appointed under the respective Acts for investigation of claims to be a … 11, 1987 raises a question of far-reaching importance. The question is whether a Commission of Inquiry constituted under Section 3 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') is a 'Court' for purposes