Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: coast guard act 1978 section 23 · Page 1 of about 33 results (0.022 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 21 2012

Ex.Uttam Navik Dalbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Mar-21-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

(O.O.D). The petitioner’scontention is that the very act of admonishing an employee is a punishment prescribed under the Coast Guard Act, 1978 which fact was also admitted by the OOD as well in his statement during the enquiry. 4. The … Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983. The charges framed against the petitioner were as under:- “(i) FIRST CHARGE: Under Section 19 (a) of Coast Guard Act, 1978:- USING CRIMINAL FORCE TO HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER. In that he, did, … finding on each charge shall be announced forthwith in the open court. 23. Thus it is inevitable to infer that Rule 93(1) expressly dispenses with

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2008

Md. Abbas Mohideen Vs. Government of India Rep. by Secretary to Govern ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-05-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Coast Guard Act, 1978 - Sections 16, 42, 51, 51(1), 51(1A), 53(1), 61(4), 66 and 119; Coast Guard (Amendment) Act, 2002; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2); Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983 - Rules 26, 63, 64 and 65

Reported in : (2008)IILLJ587Mad

water leading to deterioration of material state of starboard D.A thereby committed an offence under Section 16 of Coast Guard Act, 1978.b. Knowingly concealed the vital information of sea water ingress in star board D.A from his Commanding Officer, administrative … 1996 and the First Division Bench of the Orissa High Court stayed the proceedings by an order dated 23.9.1996. Thereafter, he filed O.J.C. No. 6959 of 1997 before the Orissa High Court on the issue relating to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1988

Dr Baliram Waman Hiray Vs. Justice B. LentIn and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-12-1988

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 - Sections 3, 3(1), 4, 5(4), 5(5) and 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 195, 195(1), 195(2), 195(3) and 346; Constitution of India - Article 141; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 193 and 228; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 23; Payment of Wages Act - Sections 18; Indian Railways Act - Sections 40

Reported in : AIR1988SC2267; (1988)90BOMLR434; 1988(3)Crimes655(SC); [1989]176ITR1(SC); JT1988(4)SC265; 1988(2)SCALE688; (1988)4SCC419; [1988]Supp2SCR942; [1989]72STC384(SC)

Act, 1985, Section 19 of the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act, 1983 and Section 95 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978, deeming the Commissioner or the Tribunal appointed under the respective Acts for investigation of claims to be a … 195(2) of the Code. The learned Counsel referred us to Section 40 of the Indian Railways Act, 1890, Section 23 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 and Section 18 of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936. These provisions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 22 2016

Union of India, Secretary to the Ministry of Defence, New Delhi and Ot ...

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Feb-22-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

an agreement to be a sub-contractor to the salvage, which is clear from his representation Ext.P8. 35. The Coast Guard Act, 1978 was enacted for constitution and regulations of armed forces of the union for ensuring the security of maritime … dated 3.8.1999 rejected the statutory representation submitted by the petitioner. It was observed in the order that, under Section 14 of the Coast Guard Act, it is one of the primary duties of the Coast Guard to … which is wrecked at any place or near the coasts of India. 23. The territorial waters of India has been defined by an Act viz.,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 19 2011

Commandant Shamsher Singh Malik Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-19-2011

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Coast Guard Act 1978 - Section 123(1); Coast Guard (Seniority and Promotion) Rules 1987 - Rule 7

1. With the promulgation of the Coast Guard Act 1978, a cadre of Coast Guards was created by hiving off a wing of the Indian Navy. A distinct … Service and earned promotion in the year 1993 as Commandant. 4. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 123(1) of the Coast Guard Act 1978, the Central Government framed the Coast Guard (Seniority and Promotion) Rules … making of an appointment in accordance with the existing Rules." (Emphasis Supplied) 23. The aforesaid dictum of law laid down in Rangaiahs case (supra) was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 04 2014

Dig K.P.S. Raghuvanshi Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-04-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

framed by the Central Government in exercise of the powers conferred upon it by Section 123(1) of the Coast Guard Act, 1978, governed the field right uptil September, 2004. Till then, all promotions in the Coast Guards, which in fact … recommendations of the Departmental Promotional Committee (DPC) for promotion to the rank of Inspector General (IG) held on 23.07.2009 as illegal, arbitrary and conducted on the basis of amended selection policy just a month prior to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2003

Hi-tech Engineers Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-28-2003

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28, 72, 88, 88A, 90 and 124

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR776

Guard is an armed force of the Union, under the Ministry of Defence, and is governed by the Coast Guard Act, 1978.7. Mr. Nankani, however, strongly urged that on realising the mistake committed by the petitioners in obtaining clearance … and they are firstly, whether the petitioners who fraudulently obtained duty free clearance of imported Dracone Barges under section 90 of the Customs Act, 1962 can file an application before the Settlement Commission and contend that even … Rs. 59,35,455/- directed the petitioners to pay the balance amount of Rs. 23,83,287/-. The commission levied Rs. 10,00,000/- towards penalty and granted immunity from fine.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 28 2003

Hi-tech Engineers Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-28-2003

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 72 and 90

Reported in : 2003(161)ELT96(Bom)

Guard is an armed force of the Union, under the Ministry of Defence, and is governed by the Coast Guard Act, 1978.7. Mr. Nankani, however, strongly urged that on realising the mistake committed by the petitioners in obtaining clearance … and they are, firstly, whether the Petitioners who fraudulently obtained duty free clearance of imported Dracone Barges under Section 90 of the Customs Act, 1962 can file an application, before the Settlement Commission and contend that even … Rs. 59,35,455/- directed the petitioners to pay the balance amount of Rs. 23,83,287/-. The Commission levied Rs. 10,00,000/-towards penalty and granted immunity from fine. The

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 09 1986

Joseph Antony Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Apr-09-1986

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kerala Marine Fishing Regulation Act, 1981 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Article 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : AIR1986Ker238

Government is manifestly unreasonable and amounts to an abuse of the statutory power vested in them.30. The Coast Guards Act, 1978 was enacted by the Parliament precisely for enforcing law and order in our territorial and other … is manifestly unreasonable and amounts to an abuse of the statutory power vested in them.30. The Coast Guards Act, 1978 was enacted by the Parliament precisely for enforcing law and order in our territorial and other waters. It … as against Exts. P1 and P2. Ext. P3 specifying the area under Section 2(h) of the Kerala Marine Fishing Regulation Act, 1980 (Act 10 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 14 1992

Smt. Hawabi Sayed Arif Sayed Hanif Vs. L. Hmingliana and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-14-1992

Subject : CriminalCustoms

Acts : Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Sections 2, 3, 8 and 9; Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 108; Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 - Sections 3(3) and 10(1)

Reported in : AIR1993SC810; 1993(1)ALT(Cri)521; 1993(41)BLJR248; 1993CriLJ172; 1992(3)Crimes635(SC); 1993(42)ECC12; JT1992(6)SC162; 1992(2)SCALE796; (1993)1SCC163

collected by the officers of the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, a surveillance was maintained by the officers on Coast Guard vessel O.G. 'VIGRAH' in the sea off Karwar for a suspect Arab Dhow carrying foreign silver to smuggle … Customs Act, 1962 (as substituted for certain words by Act 25 of 1978) which defines Indian Customs Waters as waters extending into sea up to … conferred on him under Sub-section (1) Section 3 of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') with a view to preventing him from smuggling of goods.3. … Arif Sayed Hanif, assailing the validity of the order of detention dated 23.10.90 passed against the detenu, by the first respondent (Secretary, Preventive Detention, to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial