Advanced Search Results

Md. Abbas Mohideen Vs. Government of India Rep. by Secretary to Govern ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Coast Guard Act, 1978 - Sections 16, 42, 51, 51(1), 51(1A), 53(1), 61(4), 66 and 119; Coast Guard (Amendment) Act, 2002; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 311(2); Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983 - Rules 26, 63, 64 and 65

Reported in : (2008)IILLJ587Mad

water leading to deterioration of material state of starboard D.A thereby committed an offence under Section 16 of Coast Guard Act, 1978.b. Knowingly concealed the vital information of sea water ingress in star board D.A from his Commanding Officer, administrative … respondents 5 to 8 and have perused the records.2. The petitioner in this petition challenges the order dated 29.10.2003 passed by the second respondent wherein and by which he was given the sentence of dismissal from the

Joseph Antony Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Kerala Marine Fishing Regulation Act, 1981 - Sections 4; Constitution of India - Article 19(1) and 19(6)

Reported in : AIR1986Ker238

to an abuse of the statutory power vested in them.30. The Coast Guards Act, 1978 was enacted by the Parliament precisely for enforcing law and … is manifestly unreasonable and amounts to an abuse of the statutory power vested in them.30. The Coast Guards Act, 1978 was enacted by the Parliament precisely for enforcing law and order in our territorial and other waters. It … The challenge is now pressed only as against Exts. P1 and P2. Ext. P3 specifying the area under Section 2(h) of the Kerala Marine Fishing Regulation Act, 1980 (Act 10 of 1981) (the 'Act') is innocuous in so

Yakub Abdul Razak Memon Vs. State of Maharashtra Th:cbi Mumbai

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

organized the landing of fire arms and ammunitions and hand grenades which was to take place on the coast of Dighi Jetty in Raigad District of State of Maharashtra on 09.01.1993. On the said date, Md. Dossa … and sentence passed on various dates by the Presiding Officer of the Designated Court under Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (in short ‘the TADA’) for Bombay Bomb Blast Case, Greater Bombay in BBC No.1 of … Bombay in BBC No.1 of 1993. These appeals have been filed under Section 19 of the TADA by the accused against their conviction and sentence … THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1728 of 2007 Yakub Abdul Razak Memon .... Appellant(s) vs. The State of Maharashtra, through

Sk.Singh .. Vs. the Director General, Coast Guard Headquarters, and or ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution Of India - Article 226

respondent, for a judicial review of the trial proceedings in accordance with sections 117 and 118 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978. The judicial proceedings were conducted by the Chief Law Officer on 9th September, 2002 at the Coast Guard … of 13 contained in the charge sheet and awarded the sentence of dismissal from service, as provided under section 53 of the Coast Guard Act, by its order dated 5th June, 2002. The copies of the coast … Commanding Officer, Coast Guard Station at Tuticorin between May, 1996 and June, 2000, the Deputy Commandant, M.K.Bhat, reported to duty on permanent transfer during April

Hi-tech Engineers Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 72 and 90

Reported in : 2003(161)ELT96(Bom)

Guard is an armed force of the Union, under the Ministry of Defence, and is governed by the Coast Guard Act, 1978.7. Mr. Nankani, however, strongly urged that on realising the mistake committed by the petitioners in obtaining clearance … and they are, firstly, whether the Petitioners who fraudulently obtained duty free clearance of imported Dracone Barges under Section 90 of the Customs Act, 1962 can file an application, before the Settlement Commission and contend that even … is payable on the said barges in view of Exemption Notification No. 291/84-Cus., dated 28th December, 1984 and secondly, even if it is held that

Hi-tech Engineers Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Customs

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 28, 72, 88, 88A, 90 and 124

Reported in : 2004(1)BomCR776

Guard is an armed force of the Union, under the Ministry of Defence, and is governed by the Coast Guard Act, 1978.7. Mr. Nankani, however, strongly urged that on realising the mistake committed by the petitioners in obtaining clearance … and they are firstly, whether the petitioners who fraudulently obtained duty free clearance of imported Dracone Barges under section 90 of the Customs Act, 1962 can file an application before the Settlement Commission and contend that even … is payable on the said barges in view of Exemption Notification No. 291/84-Cus dated 28th December, 1984 and secondly, even if it is held that

Ex.Uttam Navik Dalbir Singh Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

(O.O.D). The petitioner’scontention is that the very act of admonishing an employee is a punishment prescribed under the Coast Guard Act, 1978 which fact was also admitted by the OOD as well in his statement during the enquiry. 4. The … Coast Guard (Discipline) Rules, 1983. The charges framed against the petitioner were as under:- “(i) FIRST CHARGE: Under Section 19 (a) of Coast Guard Act, 1978:- USING CRIMINAL FORCE TO HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER. In that he, did, … the disciplinary proceedings of the Coast Guard held against the petitioner from 2nd June, 1997 to 6th June, 1997 and has sought the quashing of

Manish Kumar Gupta vs Director General Coast Guard and Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

has developed sea sickness.4. Learned counsel representing the Respondents, on the otherhand, relied upon Section 9 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978 read with Rules 27 and 27A of the Coast Guard (General) Rules, 1986. Reliance has also been placed … * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2706/2026 MANISH KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh A. Pandey, Adv.versusDIRECTOR GENERAL COAST GUARD AND ORS.....Respondents Through: Mr. Nirvikar

Commandant Shamsher Singh Malik Vs. Uoi and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226, 227; Coast Guard Act 1978 - Section 123(1); Coast Guard (Seniority and Promotion) Rules 1987 - Rule 7

1. With the promulgation of the Coast Guard Act 1978, a cadre of Coast Guards was created by hiving off a wing of the Indian Navy. A distinct … Service and earned promotion in the year 1993 as Commandant. 4. In exercise of the powers conferred by Section 123(1) of the Coast Guard Act 1978, the Central Government framed the Coast Guard (Seniority and Promotion) Rules … was constituted. Various posts were notified with eligibility and service conditions thereto. 2. The hierarchical structure of the Coast Guard Service is as follows: -

S. Rajesh Vs. The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Salem and Others

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

there was no permission granted to him even to participate. All Coast Guard Personnel are governed by the Coast Guard Act, 1978 and the Rules framed thereunder. As per Section 9 of the Coast Guard Act, 1978, resignation is not … (Prayer: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating