Advanced Search Results

National Assn. of Motion Pictures Exhibitors, Delhi Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Cinematograph Act, 1952; Delhi Cinematograph Rules, 1953; Union Territories (Laws) Act, 1950 - Sections 2; Punjab Cinemas Regulations Act, 1952; Constitution of India - Article 246

Reported in : ILR1983Delhi691

confusion 1918 Act as amended from time to time was re-enacted by separating the provisions, by passing the Cinematograph Act, 1952. Part I, Ii and Iv of the Central Act, 1952 extended to the whole of India while Part … into force in Delhi. Mainly the provisions of Section 7A, 7B and 7C of the Punjab Act, 1952 have been extended. Section 7A provides that … in State of Haryana to Delhi by means of notification dated 21-11-1980 iss,ued by the Central Government under Section 2 of the Union Territories (Laws Act), 1950 (hereinafter to be called the 1950 Act) is the main

K. Ganeshan and Others Vs. Film Certification Appellate Tribunal, Mini ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

application was preferred before the CBFC on 06.05.2015 for certification of the film under the provisions of the Cinematograph Act, 1952, (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). The Examination Committee of the CBFC viewed the film on 11.05.2015 and … the Tribunal, but not including any proceedings in respect of any matter, which is pending before the Tribunal; Section 7C empowers the Central Government, the Tribunal, or the Board to direct exhibition of films for examination before it

Channagiri Rangappa and Sons Vs. the District Magistrate, Chitradurga ...

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Commercial

Acts : Mysore Cinematograph Rules, 1946 - Rule 7C and 7D; Mysore Cinemas Regulation Act, 1952 - Sections 5(1) and 5(2)

Reported in : AIR1971Kant244; AIR1971Mys244; (1971)1MysLJ60

and restrictions, if any, subject to which licenses may be granted under the Act.12. Section 11 repeals the Cinematograph Act. 1923, (hereinafter referred to as the old Act).13. Though the Act has repealed the old Act. the Government … of Punjab v. Hari Kishan Sharma, : [1966]2SCR982 , a similar question arose under the Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Act. 1952. Section 5 of that Act is in pari materia with Section 5 of the Act (the Mysore Act). Gajendragadkar,

S. Rangarajan Vs. P. Jagjevan Ram and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 19(1) and 19(2); Cinematograph Act, 1952 - Sections 5, 5A, 5B and 7B; Cinematograph (Certificate) Rules, 1983 - Rule 24 and 24(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 124A

Reported in : JT1989(2)SC70; 1989(1)SCALE812; (1989)2SCC574; [1989]2SCR204

- grant of certficate challengrd in a writ petition before the High Court - Certificate revoked - The Cinematograph Act 1952, Section 5(a) provides principles for guidance in certifying films - Section 5(C) of the Act confers right of appeal … in relation to matters specified in Section 4, sub-sees. (3) and (4) of Section 5, Section 5-A and Section 7C of the said Act shall also be exercisable subject to the condition given below by the following members

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

and 173 of Part XIV of the Finance Act, 2017. Section 173 reads as follows:26. "I.-AMENDMENT TO THE CINEMATOGRAPH ACT, 1952 173. In the Cinematograph Act, 1952, after section 5D, the following section shall be inserted, namely:- "5E. Notwithstanding … in Section 7D of the Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (19 of 1952).”; (b) after Section 7C, the following section shall be inserted, namely:- “7D. Qualifications, terms and conditions of service of Presiding Officer.- Notwithstanding

Pankaj Butalia Vs. Central Board of Film Certification and Ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

accompanied by the various judgements of the Supreme Court, which had dealt with similar orders, passed under the Cinematograph Act, 1952 (in short the 1952 Act). 4.1 Evidently, no further orders were passed by the FCAT.5. Aggrieved by the … CBFC, as if, the said action was taken or done by a full complement of the CBFC. 15.1 Section 7C to 7F are not relevant for the purposes of the present proceedings, and therefore, do not require elaboration.